Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on August 28, 2002, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the CBOE. On October 25, 2002, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and to approve the proposal on an accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 8.16 to eliminate the current Retail Automatic Execution System (“RAES”) log on requirements for market-makers. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new text is italicized and proposed deleted text is [bracketed].
RAES Eligibility in Option Classes Other Than DJX, OEX and SPX
RULE 8.16 (a). No Change
[(b) In option classes designated by the appropriate Market Performance Committee, any Market-Maker who has logged on RAES at any time during an expiration month must log on the RAES system in that option class whenever he is present in that trading crowd until the next expiration.]
[(c)](b) Notwithstanding the limitations in Paragraphs (a)(iii) and (a)(iv) above, if there is inadequate RAES participation in a particular options class, Floor Officials of the appropriate Market Performance Committee may require Market-Makers who are members of the trading crowd, as defined in Rule 8.50 to log on RAES absent reasonable justification or excuse for non-participation or may allow Market-Makers in other classes of options to log on RAES in such classes.
[(d)] (c) Members who fail to abide by the foregoing requirements may be subject to disciplinary action under, among others, Rule 6.20 and Chapter XVII of the Exchange Rules. Such failure may also be the subject of remedial action by the appropriate Market Performance Committee, including but not limited to suspending a member's eligibility for participation on RAES and such other remedies as may be appropriate and allowed under Chapter VIII of the Exchange Rules.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 No Change.
.02 No Change.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the CBOE included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. Start Printed Page 68895
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Current CBOE Rule 8.16 outlines the requirements with which a market-maker must comply in order to participate on RAES. Among the requirements, any market-maker who has logged on to RAES at any time during an expiration month must log on to the RAES system in that option class whenever he is present in that trading crowd until the next expiration. After assessing the impact of the RAES log on requirement, the Exchange believes that it no longer serves the purpose for which it was created, i.e., encouraging greater market-maker participation on RAES. Current CBOE Rule 8.16 limits participation in an all-or-none fashion. As a result, the Exchange seeks to remove the log on requirement in its entirety in order to encourage market-makers to log onto RAES to the extent that their business models permit. The Exchange believes this rule change is consistent with the recent changes to Rule 6.87 of the log on requirements of the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations under the Act applicable to a national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5)  requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The CBOE believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, does not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
The CBOE has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Commission believes waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Waiver of the notice requirement and acceleration of the operative date will permit the CBOE to implement the proposed rule change without undue delay. For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposal to be effective and operative upon filing with the Commission.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609.
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2002-50 and should be submitted by December 4, 2002.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
3. The Exchange submitted a new Form 19b-4, which replaces and supersedes the original filing in its entirety.Back to Citation
4. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45894 (May 8, 2002), 67 FR 34745 (May 15, 2002).Back to Citation
9. The CBOE did not specifically request the Commission to waive the 5-day pre-filing requirement. However, because the original filing was filed more than 5 days before Amendment No. 1, which converted the filing to a non-controversial filing pursuant to Section 19b(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder, the Commission finds that the 5-day pre-filing requirement has been satisfied.Back to Citation
10. For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 02-28744 Filed 11-12-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P