Skip to Content


Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document including its time on Public Inspection. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble


Federal Trade Commission.


Invitation to comment on requested petition for exemption from Trade Regulation Rule.


The Commission solicits public comment on a petition filed by Rolls-Royce Corp., for an exemption from the requirements of the Franchise Rule.


Written comments will be accepted until May 30, 2003.


Comments may be filed in person or mailed to: Secretary, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. Requests for copies of the petition and the Franchise Rule should be directed to the Public Reference Branch, Room 130, (202) 326-2222.

Start Further Info


Steven Toporoff, Attorney, Room 238, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580 (202) 326-3135.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information


On December 21, 1978, the Federal Trade Commission promulgated a trade regulation rule entitled “Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures” (“the Franschise Rule” or “Rule”). 16 CFR Part 3436. In general, the Rule provides for pre-sale disclosure to prospective Franchisees of important information about the francisor, the franchise business, and the terms of the proposed Franchise relationship. A summary of the Rule is available from the FTC Public Reference Branch upon request.

Section 18(g) of the Federal Trade Commission Act provides that any person or class of persons covered by a trade regulation rule may petition the Commission for an exemption from such rule. If the Commission finds that the application of such rule to any person or class of persons is not necessary to prevent the unfair or deceptive acts or practices to which the rule relates, then the Commission may exempt such person or class from all or any part of the rule.

Rolls-Royce Corp. (“Rolls-Royce” or “Petitioner”) has filed a petition for an exemption from the Franchise Rule pursuant to section 18(g) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 57a(g). Rolls-Royce manufacturers turboprop, turbofan, and industrial gas turbine engines for sale in the defense and civilian aerospace and industrial markets. It also provides aftermarket support for some of its model engines though a combination of company-owned and independent authorized maintenance centers (“AMCs”). The AMCs perform repair, overhaul, and Start Printed Page 15454maintenance services for customers under the Rolls-Royce trademark.

In its petition, Roll-Royce asserts that an exemption should be granted because AMC purchasers are sophisticated business persons with extensive prior experience in the industry, and the information-exchange and negotiation process leading to execution of an AMC agreement takes place over a period of several months, ensuring adequate time for review. Petitioner asserts that the experience and sophistication of prospective dealers and the company's lengthy selection process leading to the execution of the dealership agreement make the abuses identified by the Commission as the basis for the Franchise Rule unlikely and render application of the Rule to Rolls-Royce unnecessary and burdensome.

For a complete presentation of the arguments submitted by Petitioner, please refer to the full text of the petition, which may be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Branch, on request.

In assessing the present exemption request, the Commission solicits comments on all relevant issues germane to the proceeding, including the following: (1) Is there evidence indicating that Petitioner may engage in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the offer and sale of dealership franchises? (2) Are there other reasons that might militate against granting Petitioner an exemption from the Franchise Rule?

The Commission has considered the arguments made by Petitioner and concludes that further inquiry is warranted before a decision regarding the petition may be made. The Commission, therefore, seeks comment on the exemption requested by Petitioner.

All interested parties are hereby notified that they may submit written data, views, or arguments on any issues of fact, law, or policy that may have some bearing on the requested exemption, whether or not such issues have been raised by the petition or in this notice. Such submission may be made for sixty days to the Secretary of the Commission.

Comments should be identified as “Rolls-Royce Corp. Franchise Rule Exemption Comment” and three copies should be submitted.

Start List of Subjects

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 436

  • Trade practices and Franchising
End List of Subjects

By direction of the Commission.

Start Signature

Donald S. Clark,


End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 03-7611 Filed 3-28-03; 8:45 am]