Department of Defense (DoD).
Proposed rule with request for comments.
DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide an exception from competition requirements to apply to contracts awarded under the authority of Section 822 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002. Section 822 provides for award of a follow-on production contract, without competition, to participants in an “other transaction” agreement for a prototype project, if the agreement was entered into through use of competitive procedures, provided for at least one-third non-Federal cost share, and meets certain other conditions of law.
Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before August 4, 2003, to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
Respondents may submit comments directly on the World Wide Web at http://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. As an alternative, respondents may e-mail comments to: email@example.com. Please cite DFARS Case 2002-D023 in the subject line of e-mailed comments.
Respondents that cannot submit comments using either of the above methods may submit comments to: Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Attn: Ms. Susan L. Schneider, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062; facsimile (703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2002-D023.
At the end of the comment period, interested parties may view public comments on the World Wide Web at http://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/dfars.nsf.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Susan Schneider, (703) 602-0326.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Pub. L. 103-160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) provides authority for DoD to enter into transactions other than contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements, in certain situations, for prototype projects that are directly relevant to weapons or weapon systems proposed to be acquired or developed by DoD. Such transactions are commonly referred to as “other transaction” (OT) agreements for prototype projects.
Section 822 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Pub. L. 107-107) permits award of a follow-on production contract, without competition, to participants in an OT agreement for a prototype project if—
(1) The OT agreement provided for a follow-on production contract;
(2) The OT agreement provided for at least one-third non-Federal cost share for the prototype project;
(3) Competitive procedures were used for the selection of parties for participation in the OT agreement;
(4) The participants in the OT agreement successfully completed the prototype project;
(5) The number of units provided for in the follow-on production contract does not exceed the number of units specified in the OT agreement for such a follow-on production contract; and
(6) The prices established in the follow-on production contract do not exceed the target prices specified in the OT agreement for such a follow-on production contract.Start Printed Page 33058
DoD published proposed amendments to the “Other Transactions” regulations at 32 CFR part 3 on May 20, 2003 (68 FR 27497), to implement Section 822. This proposed DFARS rule provides the corresponding exemption from competition requirements for follow-on production contracts awarded under the authority of Section 822.
This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule applies only to production contracts for DoD weapons and weapon systems. Such contracts typically are not awarded to small business concerns. Therefore, DoD has not performed an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. DoD invites comments from small businesses and other interested parties. DoD also will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected DFARS subpart in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should be submitted separately and should cite DFARS Case 2002-D023.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 206End List of Subjects Start Signature
Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 CFR part 206 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 206 continues to read as follows:Start Part
PART 206—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
2. Section 206.001 is amended by adding, after paragraph (b), a new paragraph (S-70) to read as follows:
(S-70) Also excepted from this part are follow-on production contracts for products developed pursuant to the “other transactions” authority of 10 U.S.C. 2371 for prototype projects when—
(1) The other transaction agreement includes provisions for a follow-on production contract;
(2) The contracting officer receives sufficient information from the agreements officer and the project manager for the prototype other transaction agreement, which documents that the conditions set forth in 10 U.S.C. 2371 note, subsections (f)(2)(A) and (B) (see 32 CFR 3.9(c)), have been met; and
(3) The contracting officer establishes quantities and prices for the follow-on production contract that do not exceed the quantities and target prices established in the other transaction agreement.
[FR Doc. 03-13536 Filed 6-2-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P