Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement.
The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint that accompanies the consent agreement and the terms of the consent order—embodied in the consent agreement—that would settle these allegations.
Comments must be received on or before July 14, 2003.
Comments filed in paper form should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, Room 159-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. Comments filed in electronic form should be directed to: firstname.lastname@example.org, as prescribed in the Supplementary Information section.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Engle or Matthew Daynard, FTC, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3161 or 326-3291.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Section 2.34 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page (for June 12, 2003), on the World Wide Web, at “http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/06/index.htm.” A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
Public comments are invited, and may be filed with the Commission in either paper or electronic form. Comments filed in paper form should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, Room 159-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. If a comment contains nonpublic information, it must be filed in paper form, and the first page of the document must be clearly labeled “confidential.” Comments that do not contain any nonpublic information may instead be filed in electronic form (in ASCII format, WordPerfect, or Microsoft Word) as part of or as an attachment to email messages directed to the following email box: email@example.com. Such comments will be considered by the Commission and will be available for inspection and copying at its principal office in accordance with Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final approval, an agreement containing a consent order from Unither Pharma, Inc. and its parent company, United Therapeutics Corporation (collectively “Unither”).
The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for thirty (30) days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will again review the agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it should Start Printed Page 36798withdraw from the agreement or make final the agreement's proposed order.
This matter involves allegedly misleading representations about Unither's HeartBar products, chewy food bars and powders enriched with L-Arginine, vitamins, and minerals. HeartBar's labeling describes the product as the only “medical food” for the dietary management of heart and vascular disease.
According to the FTC complaint, Unither failed to have substantiation for the claims that HeartBar: (1) Substantially decreases leg pain for people with cardiovascular disease; (2) reverses damage or disease to the heart caused by high cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, or estrogen deficiency; (3) prevents age-related vascular problems, including “hardening of the arteries” and plaque formation, and reduces the risk of developing cardiovascular disease; (4) reduces or eliminates the need for surgery, such as a coronary bypass or angioplasty, and medications, such as nitroglycerin, in patients with cardiovascular disease; and (5) improves endurance and energy for the general population. Among other reasons, several of the representations are not supported by any clinical studies on humans. Other representations are based on results reported in studies that suffer from various flaws, including the failure to account for the placebo effect and extremely small sample sizes, such that the experience of a single or a few subjects account for the benefits purportedly experienced by the active group as a whole.
The complaint further alleges that, contrary to Unither's claims, clinical studies, research, and/or trials do not show that HeartBar: (1) Decreases angina pain, including by as much as 70% within two weeks; (2) decreases leg pain while walking or exercising, including by as much as 66% within two weeks, for people with peripheral artery disease; (3) reverses the effects of high cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, and estrogen deficiency on the heart; or (4) improves endurance and energy for the general population.
The proposed consent order contains provisions designed to prevent the Unither from engaging in similar acts and practices in the future.
Part I of the order prohibits claims that HeartBar (HeartBar, HeartBar Plus, or HeartBar Sport), or any other L-Arginine product used in or marketed for the treatment, cure, or prevention of cardiovascular disease, or the improvement of cardiovascular or vascular function: (1) Substantially decreases leg pain for people with cardiovascular disease; (2) reverses damage or disease to the heart caused by high cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, estrogen deficiency, or any other medical condition or health risk; (3) prevents age-related vascular problems, including “hardening of the arteries” and plaque formation, or reduces the risk of developing cardiovascular disease; (4) reduces or eliminates the need for surgery, such as a coronary bypass or angioplasty, or for medications, such as nitroglycerin, in patients with cardiovascular disease; or (5) improves endurance, circulation, and energy for the general population, unless the claims are substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.
Part II of the order requires that Unither possess competent and reliable scientific evidence to support any future claims about the health benefits, performance, or efficacy of any food, medical food, or dietary supplement used in or marketed for: (1) The treatment, cure, or prevention of cardiovascular disease, or (2) the improvement of cardiovascular or vascular function. For the same products covered in Part II, Part III of the order prohibits Unither from misrepresenting the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or research.
Parts IV and V of the order permit drug claims permitted in labeling under any tentative final or final standard promulgated by the FDA, or under any new drug application approved by the FDA, and any representation for any product permitted in labeling by the FDA pursuant to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.
Part VI of the order mandates that the respondents notify their distributors as to the claims the Commission has challenged and report to the Commission any distributors who continue to make claims that the Commission's order prohibits.
Parts VII, VIII, IX, and X of the order require Unither to keep copies of relevant advertisements and materials substantiating claims made in the advertisements, to provide copies of the order to certain of its personnel, to notify the Commission of changes in corporate structure, and to file compliance reports with the Commission. Part XI provides that the order will terminate after twenty (20) years under certain circumstances.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and proposed order or to modify in any way their terms.Start Signature
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
[FR Doc. 03-15500 Filed 6-18-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P