Skip to Content

Notice

Self Regulatory Organizations; The Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change To Amend the PCX's Market Data Revenue Sharing Program for Tape A Securities Traded on the Archipelago Exchange

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble June 27, 2003.

On October 4, 2002, The Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1] a proposed rule change to modify its market data revenue sharing program for Tape A securities by increasing the level of the transaction credits paid with respect to transactions in Tape A securities from 40% to 50% for Users (as defined in the notice) that meet certain requirements. The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on November 19, 2002.[2] The Commission received two comments on the proposal.[3] On May 12, 2003, the PCX responded to the comment letters.[4]

The PCX proposes to modify its Tape A market data revenue sharing program by increasing the percentage of transaction credits from 40% to 50%, a percentage that is consistent with similar market data revenue sharing programs operated by other self-regulatory organizations.[5] As set forth in its July 2, 2002 Order of Summary Abrogation (“Abrogation Order”),[6] the Commission will continue to examine the issues surrounding market data fees, the distribution of market data rebates, and the impact of market data revenue sharing programs on both the accuracy of market data and on the regulatory functions of self-regulatory organizations. In the interim, the Commission believes it is reasonable to allow the PCX to operate market data revenue sharing programs that place the PCX on substantially similar footing as other self-regulatory organizations.

Thus, after careful review of the proposed rule change, the comment letters, and the PCX Response Letter, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange [7] and, in particular, the requirements of section 6 of the Act [8] and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission finds specifically that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[9] in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating securities transactions, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.

The decision to allow the PCX to increase the percentage of transaction credits available from 40% to 50%, however, is narrowly drawn, and should not be construed as resolving the issues raised in the Abrogation Order, and does not suggest what, if any, future actions the Commission may take with regard to market data revenue sharing programs.

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[10] that the proposed rule change (SR-PCX-2002-62), be, and it hereby is, approved.

Start Signature

For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[11]

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

End Signature End Preamble

Footnotes

2.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46805 (November 8, 2002), 67 FR 69794.

Back to Citation

3.  See December 10, 2002 letter from Darla C. Stuckey, Corporate Secretary, The New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission (“NYSE Letter”); December 20, 2002 letter from W. Hardy Callcott, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission (“Schwab Letter”). The Schwab Letter comments generally on market data revenue sharing, and does not specifically address the PCX's proposal to increase the percentage of market data revenue sharing in Tape A securities from 40% to 50%. The NYSE Letter incorporates by reference comments filed in previous proposed rule changes on the subject of market data revenue sharing programs, and further objects to the proposed rule change because the NYSE believes the proposal (1) “would cause NYSE to fund even more PCX payment for [order] flow than it currently does, which payments withdraw orders from the auction for reasons other than best execution”; (2) would present conflict of interest problems for PCX broker-dealers, thereby undermining the discharge of best execution obligations; and (3) “would provide incentives for markets to purchase prints of trades not executed through their facilities,” skewing the perception of a particular market's liquidity” which would result in that market receiving market data revenue in contravention of the Consolidated Tape Association Plan.

Back to Citation

4.  See May 12, 2002 letter from Kathryn L. Beck, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary, and Chief Regulatory Officer, PCX, to Joseph Morra, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission (“PCX Response Letter”). The PCX limited its response to the concerns raised in the NYSE Letter. In short, the PCX (1) stated it does not pay for order flow, and does not fund its market data revenue sharing program directly or indirectly; (2) denied that the market data revenue sharing program conflicts with broker-dealers' best execution obligations; and (3) states that the PCX cannot print trades that are executed elsewhere.

The NYSE Letter, the Schwab Letter, and the PCX Response Letter are available in the Public Reference Room.

Back to Citation

5.  See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46911 (November 26, 2002), 67 FR 72251 (December 4, 2002)(SR-BSE-2002-10).

Back to Citation

6.  Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46159 (July 2, 2002), 67 FR 45775 (July 10, 2002)(File Nos. SR-NASD-2002-61, SR-NASD-2002-68, SR-CSE-2002-06, and SR-PCX-2002-37)(Order of Summary Abrogation).

Back to Citation

7.  In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 03-17054 Filed 7-3-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P