This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
On October 10, 2002, the Government Securities Clearing Corporation (“GSCC”)  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) proposed rule change SR-GSCC-2002-10 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”). Notice of the proposal was published in the Federal Register on January 14, 2003. The Commission received two comment letters in response to the proposed rule change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
The purpose of GSCC's rule change is to establish a comprehensive standard of care and limitation of liability with respect to its members. Historically, the Commission has left to user-governed clearing agencies the question of how to Start Printed Page 44129allocate losses associated with, among other things, clearing agency functions. In determining the appropriate standard of care, the Commission has reviewed clearing agency services on a case-by-case basis in order to balance the need for a high degree of care at clearing agencies with the effects that liabilities may have on clearing agency operations, costs, and safekeeping of securities and funds. Because standards of care represent an allocation of rights and liabilities between a clearing agency and its members or participants, which are sophisticated financial entities, the Commission has refrained from establishing a unique federal standard of care and has allowed clearing agencies and other self-regulatory organizations and their participants to establish their own standards of care.
GSCC believes that adopting a rule  limiting GSCC's liability to its members to direct losses caused by GSCC's gross negligence, willful misconduct, or violation of Federal securities laws for which there is a private right of action: (1) Memorializes an appropriate commercial standard of care that will protect GSCC from undue liability; (2) permits the resources of GSCC to be appropriately utilized for promoting the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities; and (3) is consistent with similar rules adopted by other self-regulatory organizations and approved by the Commission.
III. Comment Letters
The Commission received a comment letter from Dan W. Schneider, Counsel to AGC, and a response comment letter from GSCC. The AGC letter asserted that registered clearing agencies should be subject to a negligence standard of care in safeguarding funds and securities and in performing processing obligations relating to custody functions. In addition, registered clearing agencies like GSCC that provide the securities markets and the securities processing community with centralized essential utility services and that become focal points for concentrated risk should meet at least the same standard of care that is required of commercial custodians under Commission rules designed to protect investors. Finally, AGC opined that permitting registered clearing agencies that are central facilities in the national clearance and settlement system to conform their conduct to gross negligence while requiring bank custodians to adhere to a higher standard of care creates a liability differential for which no appropriate statutory or policy basis exists.
GSCC responded that the proposed rule change would not affect GSCC's standard of performance because registered clearing agencies such as GSCC are subject to rigorous regulatory standards for their operations under Section 17A of the Act. The proposed rule change only relates to GSCC's standard of liability and not to the Commission's regulatory operational standards for GSCC. Also, GSCC has operated for 15 years with a gross negligence standard of liability under SEC temporary registration orders without any financial loss to its members or third parties arising from a failure of performance by GSCC. Neither the Act nor prior Commission orders require that a particular level of liability for private rights of action be assumed by registered clearing agencies, as distinguished from the high regulatory standards imposed by the Commission for clearing agency operations under Section 17A. In addition, GSCC members are sophisticated parties who can best determine the allocation of GSCC risk for unintentional loss. GSCC pointed out that adoption of a universal simple negligence standard of liability for GSCC would likely result in a gap between the liability limitation of GSCC and the gross negligence liability limitation of clearing banks and other service providers to which GSCC is dependent for certain key operational services.
Section 19(b) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. The Commission believes that approval of GSCC's rule change is consistent with this Section because it will permit the resources of GSCC to be appropriately utilized for promoting the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities.
Although the Act does not specify the standard of care that must be exercised by registered clearing agencies, the Commission has determined that a gross-negligence standard of care is acceptable for non-custodial functions where the parties contractually agree to limit liability. GSCC's functions are Start Printed Page 44130non-custodial in that it does not hold its members funds or securities. GSCC relies on clearing banks to perform custodial services for Government securities, which are uncertificated, and for funds. It is reasonable for GSCC, which is member-owned and governed, and its members to agree among themselves through board approval of the proposed rule change and through the proposed rule change notice and approval process to agree and to contract with one another in a cooperative arrangement as to how to allocate GSCC's liability among GSCC and themselves.
In its order granting temporary registration as a clearing agency, the Commission expressed concerned that GSCC's failure to perform accurately and timely the comparison service could adversely affect the ability of GSCC members to deliver securities and effect trade settlements. Considering the size of the Government securities market and the next-day time frame for trade settlements, the Commission deemed it appropriate that GSCC amend its standard of care to an ordinary negligence standard of care in performing all functions affecting member settlements of Government securities. The Commission, recognizing that GSCC's members are best suited to allocate GSCC's rights and liabilities, has determined and finds that, given the non-custodial nature of GSCC's services, the extensive and rigorous financial and operational regulatory oversight to which GSCC is subject, and GSCC's exemplary level of performance, a gross negligence standard of care is appropriate for GSCC.
The Commission has given thoughtful and careful consideration to the comment letter of AGC and finds that AGC's concerns about the performance level of GSCC operating under a gross negligence standard of care and limitation of liability are addressed by the extensive regulatory oversight to which GSCC is subject as a registered clearing agency and the fact GSCC is not changing its financial and operational standards with the adoption of a gross negligence standard of care and limitation of liability.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-GSCC-2002-10) be and hereby is approved.Start Signature
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
1. On January 1, 2003, MBS Clearing Corporation (“MBSCC”) was merged into the Government Securities Clearing Corporation (“GSCC”) under New York law, and GSCC was renamed the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”). The functions previously performed by GSCC are now performed by the Government Securities Division (“GSD”) of FICC, and the functions previously performed by MBSCC are now performed by the Mortgage-Backed Securities Division (“MBSD”) of FICC. The GSD succeeded to the GSCC proposed rule change upon the merger of MBSCC and GSCC. To avoid confusion and maintain consistency with the Notice, in this Order, we will continue to refer to GSCC instead of the GSD of FICC. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47015 (December 17, 2002), 67 FR 78531 [File Nos. SR-GSCC-2002-09 and SR-MBSCC-2002-01].Back to Citation
4. Letters from Dan W. Schneider, Counsel to the Association of Global Custodians (“AGC”) (March 24, 2003) and Jeffrey F. Ingber, Managing Director, General Counsel, and Secretary, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (June 12, 2003).Back to Citation
5. Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 20221 (September 23, 1983), 48 FR 45167 and 22940 (February 24, 1986), 51 FR 7169.Back to Citation
6. Id.Back to Citation
7. Id.Back to Citation
8. The language of new Section 3 to Rule 39 is as follows: Section 3—Limitation on Liability of the Corporation Notwithstanding any other provision in the Rules:
(a) The Corporation will not be liable for any action taken, or any delay or failure to take any action, hereunder or otherwise to fulfill the Corporation's obligations to its Members, other than for losses caused directly by the Corporation's gross negligence, willful misconduct, or violation of Federal securities laws for which there is a private right of action. Under no circumstances will the Corporation be liable for the acts, delays, omissions, bankruptcy, or insolvency, of any third party, including, without limitation, any depository, custodian, sub-custodian, clearing or settlement system, transfer agent, registrar, data communication service or delivery service (“Third Party”), unless the Corporation was grossly negligent, engaged in willful misconduct, or in violation of Federal securities laws for which there is a private right of action in selecting such Third Party; and
(b) Under no circumstances will the Corporation be liable for any indirect, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or exemplary loss or damage (including, but not limited to, loss of business, loss of profits, trading losses, loss of opportunity and loss of use) howsoever suffered or incurred, regardless of whether the Corporation has been advised of the possibility of such damages or whether such damages otherwise could have been foreseen or prevented.Back to Citation
11. In the release setting forth standards to be used by the Division of Market Regulation in evaluating clearing agency registration applications, the Division of Market Regulation urged clearing agencies to embrace a strict standard of care in safeguarding participants' funds and securities. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 16900 (June 17, 1980), 45 FR 4192. In the release granting permanent registration to The Depository Trust Company, the National Securities Clearing Corporation, and several other clearing agencies, however, the Commission indicated that it did not believe that sufficient justification existed at that time to require a unique federal standard of care for registered clearing agencies. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 20221 (October 3, 1983), 48 FR 45167. In a subsequent release, the Commission stated that the clearing agency standard of care and the allocation of rights and liabilities between a clearing agency and its participants applicable to clearing agency services generally may be set by the clearing agency and its participants. In the same release, the Commission stated that it should review clearing agency proposed rule changes in this area on a case-by-case basis and balance the need for a high degree of clearing agency care with the effect resulting liabilities may have on clearing agency operations, costs, and safeguarding of securities and funds. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 22940 (February 24, 1986), 51 FR 7169. Subsequently, in a release granting temporary registration as a clearing agency to The Intermarket Clearing Corporation, the Commission stated that a gross negligence standard of care may be appropriate for certain noncustodial functions that, consistent with minimizing risk mutualization, a clearing agency, its board of directors, and its members determine to allocate to individual service users. Securities Exchange Act release No. 26154 (October 3, 1988), 53 FR 39556. Finally, in a release granting the approval of temporary registration as a clearing agency to the International Securities Clearing Corporation, the Commission indicated that historically it has left to user-governed clearing agencies the question of how to allocate losses associated with noncustodial, data processing, clearing agency functions and has approved clearing agency services embodying a gross-negligence standard of care. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 26812 (May 12, 1989), 54 FR 21691.Back to Citation
12. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 25740 (May 24, 1988), 53 FR 19639.Back to Citation
13. GSCC must have its rule changes approved by the Commission and is the subject of frequent Commission examinations for compliance with its rules and those of the Commission. As directed by Congress, the Commission cannot approve GSCC's proposed rule changes if they are inconsistent with Section 17A of the Act, including being inimical to the public interest or the protection of investors.Back to Citation
14. Over the past 15 years, GSCC has demonstrated a high level of responsibility in performing its non-custodial functions and has had appropriate standards in place to ensure adequate performance. As a result, GSCC has operated without financial loss to its members or third parties arising from its failure to perform.Back to Citation
15. The Commission notes that the rule change does not alleviate GSCC from liability for violation of the Federal securities laws where there exists a private right of action and therefore is not designed to adversely affect GSCC's compliance with the Federal securities laws and private rights of action that exist for violations of the Federal securities laws.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 03-18990 Filed 7-24-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P