This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
The Montpelier Ranger District, Caribou-Targhee National Forest will be preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to analyze the effects of continued domestic livestock grazing on eight cattle allotments and two sheep allotments within the South Bear River Ranger project area. The project area is the Idaho tract of the Cache National Forest. It includes the portion of the Bear River Range of the Wasatch Range which extends from the Utah-Idaho border to just south of Emigration Highway, Idaho. The communities of Fish Haven, St. Charles, Bloomington, and Paris are situated east of this area, and Preston and Franklin lie west of the project area. Allotment Management Plans would be revised on the following allotments: Bear Lake C&H, Bloomington C&H, Cherryville C&H, Franklin Basin S&G, Fish Haven C&H, Logan River S&G, Mink Creek C&H, Paris-Liberty C&H, and Sugar Creek C&H. The scope of the analysis is limited to the consideration of the revision of the Allotment Management Plans and connected actions. The project impact zone includes Bear Lake and Franklin Counties, Idaho, and Idaho Fish and Game Hunting Units (77) and (78). Implementation of this project is scheduled to begin fiscal year 2005. The decision would provide guidance for grazing allotments in the project area for the next twenty years.
Written comments concerning the scope of the analysis described in this Notice should be received within 30 days of the date of publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. No scoping meetings are planned at this time. Information received will be used in preparation of the Draft EIS and Final EIS.
Send written comments to Montpelier Ranger District, Attn. Dennis Deuhren, 322 North 4th St., Montpelier, Idaho 83254. The responsible official for this decision is Dennis Deuhren, District Ranger.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning the proposed action and EIS should be directed to Heidi Heyrend, Rangeland Management Specialist at (208) 847-0375.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The EIS and subsequent revision of the Allotment Management Plans will bring these allotments in compliance with Public Law 104, and other applicable laws and regulations. The Forest Service invites written comments and suggestions on the issues related to the proposal and the area being analyzed. Information received will be used in preparation of the Draft EIS and Final EIS. For most effective use, comments should be submitted to the Forest Service within 30 days from the date of publication of this Notice in the Federal Register.
Agency representatives and other interested people are invited to visit with Forest Service officials at any time during the EIS process. Two specific time periods are identified for the receipt of formal comments on the analysis. The two comment periods include during the scoping process (the next thirty days following the publication of this Notice in the Federal Register) and during the formal review period of the Draft EIS.
The Forest Service estimates the Draft EIS will be filed within 5 months of this Notice of Intent, approximately April 2004. The Final EIS will be filed within 6 months of that date, approximately September 2004.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts, City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21)Start Signature
Dated: September 11, 2003.
District Ranger, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, Intermountain Region, USDA Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 03-24166 Filed 9-22-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M