Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on February 24, 2003, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CBOE. The CBOE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposal on October 8, 2003. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The CBOE proposes to amend CBOE Rules 6.45, “Priority of Bids and Offers,” and 6.53, “Certain Types of Orders Defined,” to allow ratio orders to be executed through the CBOE. The text of the proposed rule change appears below. Additions are italicized; deletions are bracketed.
Priority of Bids and Offers
Rule 6.45 Except as provided by Rules, including but not limited to Rule 6.2A, 6.8, 6.9, Rule 6.47, Rule 8.87, and CBOE Regulatory Circulars approved by the SEC concerning Participation Rights, the following rules of priority shall be observed with respect to bids and offers:
(a)-(d) No Change.
(e) Complex Order Priority Exception: A member holding a spread, straddle, [or ] combination, or ratio order (or a stock option order as defined in Rule 1.1(ii)(b)) and bidding (offering) on a net debit or credit basis (in a multiple of the minimum increment) may execute the order with another member without giving priority to equivalent bids (offers) in the trading crowd or in the book provided at least one leg of the order betters the corresponding bid (offer) in the book. Stock-option orders, as defined in Rule 1.1(ii)(a), have priority over bids (offers) of the trading crowd but not over bids (offers) of public customers in the limit order book.
* * * Interpretation and Policies:
.01-.02 No change.
Certain Types of Orders Defined
Rule 6.53 (a)-(m) No change.
(n) Ratio Order. A Ratio Order is a spread, straddle, or combination order in which the stated number of option contracts to buy (sell) is not equal to the stated number of option contracts to sell (buy), provided that the number of contracts differ by a permissible ratio. For purposes of this section, a permissible ratio is any ratio that is equal to or greater than one-to-three (.333) and less than or equal to three-to-one (3.0). For example, a one-to-two (.5) ratio, a two-to-three (.667) ratio, or a two-to-one (2.0) ratio is permissible, whereas a one-to-four (.25) ratio or a four-to-one (4.0) ratio is not.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the CBOE included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change, and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE Rule 6.53 lists and defines the several types of orders that are executed through the CBOE. Of the several types of orders defined in CBOE Rule 6.53, three are complex orders: spread orders, combination orders, and straddle orders. The CBOE proposes to add another type of complex order, ratio orders, to the list of orders included in CBOE Rule 6.53. A ratio order is either a spread, straddle, or combination order in which the stated number of option contracts to buy (sell) is not equal to the stated number of option contracts to sell (buy), provided that the number of contracts differs by a permissible ratio. Under the CBOE's proposal, a permissible ratio is any ratio that is equal to or greater than one to three (.333) or less than or equal to three to one (3.0). For example, a one to two (.5) ratio, a two to three (.667) ratio, or a two to one (2.0) ratio is permissible, whereas a one to four (.25) ratio or a four to one (4.0) ratio is not.
The CBOE believes that ratio orders are merely slight variations on the types of complex orders currently permitted on the CBOE. For this reason, the CBOE believes that it is appropriate to treat ratio orders in a manner similar to the existing complex orders that currently trade on the CBOE. Accordingly, the CBOE proposes to afford ratio orders within the permissible ratio the exception to the priority rules under CBOE Rule 6.45(e).
Specifically, CBOE Rule 6.45(e) provides for exceptions to the Exchange's priority rules when a member is holding a spread order, straddle order, or a combination order. Under CBOE Rule 6.45(e), a member holding a spread, straddle, or combination order and bidding (offering) on a net debit or credit basis (in a multiple of the minimum increment) may execute the order with another member without giving priority to equivalent bids (offers) in the trading crowd or in the book, provided that at least one leg of the order betters the corresponding bid (offer) in the book. Under the CBOE's proposal, ratio orders that are equal to or greater than one to three (.333) or less than or equal to three to one (3.0) will be given the same exception under CBOE Rule 6.45(e) as spread, straddle, and combination orders.
Because the proposal seeks consistent priority treatment for similar types of orders traded on the CBOE, the CBOE believes that the proposal furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act  Start Printed Page 61500to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and to protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609.
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All submissions should refer to file number SR-CBOE-2003-07 and should be submitted by November 18, 2003.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.Start Signature
Margaret H. McFarland,
3. See letter from James M. Flynn, Attorney II, Legal Division, CBOE, to Yvonne Fraticelli, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated October 6, 2003 (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No. 1 revises the proposal to provide that the permissible ratio for a ratio order is any ratio that is equal to or greater than one to three (.333) and less than or equal to three to one (3.0).Back to Citation
4. These orders include, for example, market orders, contingency orders, and straddle orders.Back to Citation
5. These types of orders are defined in paragraphs (d), (e), and (f), respectively, of CBOE Rule 6.53.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 03-27092 Filed 10-27-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P