Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on September 24, 2003, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX” or “Exchange”), through its subsidiary, PCX Equities, Inc. (“PCXE”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On October 10, 2003, the Exchange filed an amendment that entirely replaced the original rule filing. The PCX has designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the PCX under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act, which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange, through PCXE, proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees and Charges (“Schedule”) for the Archipelago Exchange (“ArcaEx”) to establish an exception to an administrative late charge applicable to ETP Holders and Sponsoring ETP Holders for failure to pay applicable dues, fees, or charges that are past due. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the PCX and at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for its proposal and discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend ArcaEx's Schedule to establish an exception to an administrative late charge applicable to ETP Holders and Sponsoring ETP Holders who trade on ArcaEx for failure to pay dues, fees, or charges that are past due.
Currently, ArcaEx  assesses an administrative late charge to ETP Holders and Sponsoring ETP Holders that are substantially late in making payments to ArcaEx of dues, fees, fines or other charges. The purpose of this charge is to recover ArcaEx's costs in seeking to collect such payments when they are past due and to encourage ETP Holders and Sponsoring ETP Holders to make such payments in a timely manner. ArcaEx provides invoices and related notices to ETP Holders and Sponsoring ETP Holders as follows: An initial invoice is sent approximately five days after a given month in which dues, fees or other charges are accrued. If no payment is made on the invoice within one month, ArcaEx sends the ETP Holder or Sponsoring ETP Holder a “late” notice on the tenth day of the month following the month in which the invoice was issued. Thereafter, if no payment is made by the twentieth of the month following issuance, ArcaEx sends a second “late” notice with an administrative late charge. The amount of the late charge is $250.00 or 1.0 percent of the invoice amount (whichever is greater) if the ETP Holder or Sponsoring ETP Holder is late once within the previous twelve months; and $500.00 or 1.5 percent of the invoice amount (whichever is greater) if the ETP Holder or Sponsoring ETP Holder is late more than once within the previous twelve months.
ArcaEx is proposing to establish an exception that would eliminate the requirement to pay the administrative late charges related to transaction fees. The purpose of such an exception is for business reasons in that ArcaEx is seeking to promote a more competitive level to its ETP Holders and Sponsoring ETP Holders for conducting business on ArcaEx. The administrative late charge will continue to be applied to all other dues, fees or charges that are past due.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act, in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members.Start Printed Page 61545
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act  and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder, because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All submissions should refer to file number SR-PCX-2003-53 and should be submitted by November 18, 2003.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
3. See October 9, 2003 letter from Tania J. Cho, Regulatory Policy, PCX, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, and attachment (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No. 1 replaces and supersedes the original proposed rule change in its entirety. For purposes of calculating the 60-day abrogation period, the Commission considers the period to have commenced on October 10, 2003, the date the PCX filed Amendment No. 1. See section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).Back to Citation
5. With the exception of regulatory related fees and charges, for which the PCX administer, ArcaEx administers the billing and collection of all other fees and charges.Back to Citation
6. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35757 (May 24, 1995), 60 FR 28433 (May 31, 1995), (SR-PSE-95-15) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of the Administrative “Late” Charges). While this rule change in the Schedule has been operative since May 13, 1995, due to a clerical error the Schedule was not updated internally at that time. Hence, the Schedule, to date, has not reflected the late charge. This administrative error has been corrected internally by the PCX's Finance Department.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 03-27096 Filed 10-27-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P