Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
Notice of the Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan.
On June 4, 2003, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) published in the Federal Register the preliminary rescission of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel plate in coils from Taiwan. See Notice of the Preliminary Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan, 68 FR 33472 (June 4, 2003) (“Preliminary Recession”). This review covers two manufacturers of the subject merchandise, Yieh United Steel Corporation (“YUSCO”), a Taiwanese producer of subject merchandise, and Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd. (“Ta Chen”), also a Taiwanese producer of subject merchandise. The period of review (“POR”) is May 1, 2001 through April 30, 2002.
We preliminarily rescinded this review based on record evidence supporting the conclusion that there were no entries into the United States of subject merchandise during the POR by respondents. See Preliminary Rescission. We are now issuing our final rescission of this review based on evidence on the record indicating that there were no entries into the United States of subject merchandise during the POR from the respondents.
November 7, 2003.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Bertrand or Robert Bolling, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3207 or (202) 482-3434 respectively.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On May 21, 1999, the Department of Commerce (“Department”) published the antidumping duty order on stainless steel plate in coils from Taiwan. See Antidumping Duty Orders; Certain Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium, Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan, 64 FR 27756 (May 21, 1999). On May 6, 2002, the Department published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of this order for the period May 1, 2001 through April 30, 2002. See Notice of Opportunity to Request Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation, 67 FR 30356 (May 6, 2002). On May 7, 2002, Petitioners1 timely requested that the Department conduct an administrative review of sales by YUSCO, a Taiwan producer and exporter of subject merchandise, and Ta Chen, also a Taiwan producer and exporter of subject merchandise. On June 25, 2002, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (“the Act”), the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of this antidumping duty administrative review of sales by YUSCO and Ta Chen for the period May 1, 2001 through April 30, 2002. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 67 FR 42753 (June 25, 2002).
On July 10, 2002, the Department issued its antidumping duty Start Printed Page 63068questionnaire to YUSCO and Ta Chen. On July 15, 2002, Ta Chen stated that it did not have any U.S. sales, shipments or entries of subject merchandise during the POR, and requested that it not be required to answer the Department's questionnaire. On July 18, 2002, YUSCO stated that it did not have any U.S. sales, shipments or entries of subject merchandise during the POR. On October 8, 2002, the Department sent an inquiry to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) to confirm that YUSCO and Ta Chen had no shipments of subject merchandise into the United States during the POR.
On June 4, 2003, the Department preliminary rescinded the administrative review with respect to Ta Chen and YUSCO based on record evidence and the Customs inquiry, both of which it determined supported the conclusion that there were no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. See Preliminary Rescission. On August 15, 2003, Petitioners filed a case brief. Respondents did not file case briefs. On August 21, 2003, Respondent YUSCO filed a rebuttal brief. Respondent Ta Chen did not file a rebuttal brief. Neither Petitioners nor respondents requested a hearing in the instant review.
Scope of the Review
For purposes of this review, the product covered is certain stainless steel plate in coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or without other elements. The subject plate products are flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in width and 4.75 mm or more in thickness, in coils, and annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise descaled. The subject plate may also be further processed (e.g., cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that it maintains the specified dimensions of plate following such processing. Excluded from the scope of this review are the following: (1) Plate not in coils, (2) plate that is not annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise descaled, (3) sheet and strip, and (4) flat bars. In addition, certain cold-rolled stainless steel plate in coils is also excluded from the scope of these orders. The excluded cold-rolled stainless steel plate in coils is defined as that merchandise which meets the physical characteristics described above that has undergone a cold-reduction process that reduced the thickness of the steel by 25 percent or more, and has been annealed and pickled after this cold reduction process. The merchandise subject to this review is currently classifiable in the HTS at subheadings: 7219.11.00.30, 7219.11.00.60, 7219.12.00.05, 7219.12.00.20, 7219.12.00.25, 7219.12.00.50, 7219.12.00.55, 7219.12.00.65, 7219.12.0070, 7219.12.00.80, 7219.31.00.10, 7219.90.00.10, 7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 7220.11.00.00, 7184.108.40.206, 7220.127.116.11, 718.104.22.168, 722.214.171.124, 7220.20.60.05, 7126.96.36.199, 7188.8.131.52, 7184.108.40.206, 7220.127.116.11, 7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15, 7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80.
Although the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under investigation is dispositive.
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2001 through April 30, 2002.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case brief and rebuttal brief by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the “Issues and Decision Memorandum” (“Decision Memorandum”) from Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration, Group III, to James J. Jochum, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated November 3, 2003, which is hereby adopted by this notice. Petitioners argue that the administrative review should not be rescinded because the Department failed to examine the affiliates of YUSCO and did not require Ta Chen to link its POR sales to pre-suspension entries. Respondent YUSCO argues that the administrative review should be rescinded because evidence on the record supports the conclusion that YUSCO had no entries during the POR. We have determined to rescind this administrative review because the Department's interpretation of its statute and regulations, as affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, supports not conducting a administrative review when the evidence on the record indicates that respondents had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. This interpretation is further supported by the fact that the Department has determined that there have been no entries of respondent's merchandise since before the suspension of liquidation, which leads the Department to determine that merchandise resold by respondents during the POR did not constitute subject merchandise.
A complete list of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have responded, are in the Decision Memorandum which is attached to this notice as an Appendix. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main Department building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/summary/list.htm. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department may rescind an administrative review, in whole or only with respect to a particular exporter or producer, if the Secretary concludes that, during the period covered by the review, there were no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise, as the case may be. In this case the Department is satisfied, after a review of information on the record, that there were no entries of stainless steel plate in coils produced and exported from Ta Chen or YUSCO during the POR. Therefore, we are rescinding this review with respect to Ta Chen and YUSCO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). The cash deposit rate for YUSCO will remain at 8.02 percent, for Ta Chen the cash deposit rate will remain at 10.20 percent, and for “all other” producers/exporters of the subject merchandise the cash deposit rate will remain at 7.39 percent, the rates established in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding. See Notice of Final Results and Rescission in Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Taiwan, 67 FR 40914 (June 14, 2002). These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review
Changes Since the Preliminary Rescission
We have made no changes from the Preliminary Rescission.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption Start Printed Page 63069that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (“APOs”) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This issuing and publishing this determination in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.Start Signature
Dated: November 3, 2003.
James J. Jochum,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
LIST OF ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION
A. Issues with Respect to Ta Chen
Comment 1: Examining Alleged Middleman Dumping of Ta Chen
Comment 2: Commerce's Rescission Policy
B. Issues with Respect to YUSCO
Comment 3: YUSCO's Affiliated Parties
Comment 4: Alleged Error in the Selection of the Cash Deposit Rate
C. Issues with Respect to Ta Chen and YUSCO
Comment 5: Placing Information on the RecordEnd Supplemental Information
1. Allegheny Ludlum, AK Steel Corporation, Butler Armco Independent Union, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, and Zanesville Armco Independent Organization are collectively “Petitioners” for this review.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 03-28126 Filed 11-6-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S