Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on December 19, 2003, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the NASD. The NASD has designated the proposed rule change as constituting a “non-controversial” rule change under paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 under the Act, which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission is publishing this amended notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The NASD is filing with the Commission portions of a Notice to Members discussing the application of NASD Rule 2790. The NASD is not proposing any textual changes to the rules of NASD.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the NASD included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
On October 24, 2003, the Commission approved new NASD Rule 2790 (Restrictions on the Purchase and Sale of Initial Equity Public Offerings). As stated in the Commission approval order, NASD will publish a Notice to Members discussing the application of its Rule 2790. In consulting with the Commission staff regarding the Notice, the Commission staff determined that two provisions in the Notice constitute interpretations of NASD Rule 2790 that, Start Printed Page 75305due to their nature, should be filed as a proposed rule change.
The first provision relates to paragraph (a)(4)(C) of Rule 2790, which provides an exclusion for “purchases by a broker/dealer (or owner of a broker/dealer), organized as an investment partnership, of a new issue at the public offering price, provided such purchases are credited to the capital accounts of its partners in accordance with paragraph (c)(4).” This exclusion is intended to allow a hedge fund that registers as a broker-dealer or that has a subsidiary that is a broker-dealer  to purchase new issues on the same terms as other investment partnerships. For instance, pursuant to paragraph (a)(4)(C), a JBO hedge fund may purchase new issues so long as the beneficial interests of restricted persons do not exceed in the aggregate 10% of the fund. The NASD recognizes that there are a number of legal structures that a JBO hedge fund can take. Accordingly, the Notice will state:
Paragraph (a)(4)(C) refers specifically to “investment partnership” because we understand this is the most common organizational form of JBO hedge funds. We believe, however, that the decision to organize as a limited liability company, or some other corporate form, should not undermine the relief granted to hedge funds organized as JBOs or with JBO subsidiaries.
The second provision relates to the preconditions for sale in a fund-of-funds context. Paragraph (b) of Rule 2790 provides, in relevant part, that a member may not sell new issues to any account unless within the previous 12 months it has in good faith obtained a representation from either: (1) The beneficial owners of the account, or a person authorized to represent the beneficial owners of an account, that the account is eligible to purchase new issues in accordance with the rule; or (2) certain conduits (such as a bank, foreign bank, broker-dealer, or investment adviser) that all purchases of new issues are in compliance with the rule.
In a fund-of-funds context, a member must obtain a representation only from a person authorized to represent the beneficial owners of the fund/account that purchases new issues directly from the member (“master fund”). However, in making such a representation, a representative of the master fund would need to ascertain the status of investors of any feeder funds that invest in the master fund. In ascertaining the status of investors of any feeder funds, the NASD will allow the representative of the master fund to rely on information from any feeder fund. To address the practicalities of the certification process, the Notice will state:
While the Rule specifies that a member must verify the status of the master fund annually, the Rule does not specify a time period during which a master fund may rely on information from a feeder fund. NASD recognizes that logistical impracticalities may prevent all authorized representatives of feeder funds from verifying information at the same time as the representative of the master fund. Thus, NASD will allow the representative of a master fund to rely on information from any feeder fund that is no more than 12 months old. Similarly, the representative of a feeder fund that in turn receives investments from other feeder funds may rely on information that is no more than 12 months old.
2. Statutory Basis
The NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the NASD's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; to promote just and equitable principles of trade; and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The NASD believes that its Rule 2790, as described herein, protects investors and the public interest by: ensuring that members make a bona fide public offering of securities at the public offering price; ensuring that members do not withhold securities in a public offering for their own benefit or use such securities to reward certain persons who are in a position to direct future business to the member; and ensuring that industry “insiders,” including members and their associated persons, do not take advantage of their “insider” position in the industry to purchase new issues for their own benefit at the expense of public customers.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The NASD has designated the proposed rule change as “non-controversial” pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder. The NASD has represented that the proposed rule change: (1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days after the date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Rule 19b-4(f)(6) also requires the self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The NASD fulfilled the five-day pre-filing notice requirement.
The NASD has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day pre-operative waiting period, which would make the proposed rule change operative immediately. The Commission believes that it is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest to waive the 30-day pre-operative period in this case because the proposed rule change provides additional guidance to investors regarding the application of NASD Rule 2790 and will facilitate the implementation of the new rule in the time frame described in the approval order. For these reasons, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day pre-operative period. Therefore, the proposal becomes operative immediately.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Start Printed Page 75306
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASD-2003-190 and should be submitted by January 20, 2004.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
4. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48701 (October 24, 2003), 68 FR 62126 (October 31, 2003) (approving File No. SR-NASD-99-60).Back to Citation
5. Certain hedge funds, or subsidiaries thereof, elect to become registered broker-dealers and share a back office with another broker-dealer. These entities are called joint back office broker-dealers (“JBOs”).Back to Citation
9. See supra note 4.Back to Citation
10. For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 03-32039 Filed 12-29-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P