Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on December 22, 2003, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the CBOE. On January 20, 2004, CBOE submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE proposes to extend portions of its obvious error rule to open outcry transactions. Proposed new language is italicized; proposed deletions are in [brackets].
Rule 6.25 Nullification and Adjustment of [Electronic] Transactions
This Rule governs the nullification and adjustment of options trades [executed electronically and has no application to options trades executed in open outcry]. Paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and (6) of this Rule have no applicability to trades executed in open outcry.
(a)-(e) No change.
Interpretations and Policies * * *
.01—.02 No change.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. Start Printed Page 7059
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
On November 24, 2003, the Commission approved CBOE's obvious error rule, which establishes six specific objective guidelines that may be used as the basis for adjusting or nullifying a transaction. The Exchange specifically limited application of the obvious error rule to trades executed electronically, the premise being, according to CBOE, that parties to an open outcry trade would have an opportunity to evaluate whether to enter into a transaction prior to actually consummating that transaction. Therefore, if the market maker determined to make the trade after evaluating all available information, he shouldn't be able to reconsider the decision after the trade occurred. Recent events have proved that while this is generally a sound premise, instances outside of the control of the Exchange and the parties to a trade necessitate a different conclusion. For this reason, the Exchange proposes to amend its obvious error rule to make certain limited portions of the rule applicable to open outcry trades.
Specifically, CBOE proposes to extend the application of CBOE Rule 6.25(a)(3), (4), and (5) to open outcry trades. CBOE also proposes that existing paragraphs (b)-(e) of CBOE Rule 6.25 would apply to the adjustment and nullification of open outcry transactions in the exact same manner that they apply to electronic transactions.
CBE Rule 6.25(a)(3), (4), and (5) cover: Verifiable Disruptions or Malfunctions of Exchange Systems, Erroneous Print in the Underlying, and Erroneous Quote in the Underlying. Market makers base their quotes off of the underlying and each of these provisions covers instances where the information the market maker is using to price options is erroneous, through no fault of their own. For instance, with respect to sections (4) and (5) of CBOE Rule 6.25, an erroneous quote or print in the underlying means that the market maker is receiving erroneous information from the underlying market, which he then incorporates into his quotes. In these instances, CBOE represents that the market maker has little if any chance of pricing options accurately. CBOE believes that the same rationale as to why these provisions apply to electronic trades should apply to open outcry trades.
CBOE offers the following example: assume that the Nasdaq Stock Market reports bad trades and then, pursuant to its NASD Rule 11890, either nullifies or adjusts them. During this period, assume 10 trades execute on CBOE, eight of which occur electronically, and two of which occur in open outcry. The Exchange, pursuant to CBOE Rule 6.25(a)(4), can adjust or nullify the electronic trades; however, it can do nothing regarding the open outcry trades. CBOE believes that this is certainly an unintended and inequitable result.
The Exchange does not propose to extend the application of sections (a)(1) (Obvious Price Error), (a)(2) (Obvious Quantity Error), and (a)(6) (Trades Below Intrinsic Value) of CBOE Rule 6.25 to open outcry trading. With respect to subparagraph (a)(1) (Obvious Price Error), CBOE believes that if a market maker receives accurate underlying pricing information and gives an inaccurate quote, he must live with the consequences of his actions. This also applies to instances in which the market maker gives a verbal quote with a bigger size than intended or where he inadvertently prices an option under parity.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act  in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5)  in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. CBOE believes that the proposal provides for the adjustment or nullification of trades executed at clearly erroneous prices due to the receipt by the market maker of inaccurate pricing information that he uses to price his markets. CBOE notes that the exact same provisions have already been approved in the context of electronic trading.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change; or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Comments should be submitted electronically at the following e-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org. All comment letters should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2003-59. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, comments should be sent in hard copy or by e-mail but not by both methods. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All submissions should be submitted by March 4, 2004.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
3. See letter from Steve Youhn, Legal Division, CBOE, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation (“Division”), Commission, dated January 16, 2004. Amendment No. 1 amended the introductory paragraph of CBOE Rule 6.25 to clarify that existing paragraphs (b)-(e) of CBOE Rule 6.25 will apply to the adjustment and nullification of open outcry transactions in the exact same manner that they apply to electronic transactions. Amendment No. 1 also amended the title of CBOE Rule 6.25 to eliminate the word “Electronic.”Back to Citation
4. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48827 (November 24, 2003), 68 FR 67498 (December 2, 2003) (File No. SR-CBOE-2001-04).Back to Citation
7. See supra note 4.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 04-3109 Filed 2-11-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P