Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
This rule terminates the Western Federal milk marketing order, effective April 1, 2004. A referendum held to determine approval by producers did not obtain the necessary two-thirds percent for adopting the amended order. In these circumstances, the continuation of the existing Western order would not be in conformity with the declared policy of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act (AMAA), the statute providing for milk marketing orders.
April 1, 2004.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gino M. Tosi, Marketing Specialist, Order Formulation and Enforcement Branch, USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop 0231—Room 2971, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0231, (202) 690-1366, e-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) requires the Agency to examine the impact of a proposed rule on small entities. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service has certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agricultural Marketing Service has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities and has certified that this proposed action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule would eliminate the regulatory impact of the order on dairy farmers and regulated handlers. For the purpose of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a dairy farm is considered a “small business” if it has an annual gross revenue of less than $750,000, and a dairy products manufacturer is a “small business” if it has fewer than 500 employees. In the Western Federal milk order 550 of the 860 dairy producers (farmers), or 64 percent, whose milk was pooled under the order in June 2003 would meet the definition of small businesses. On the processing side, 15 of the 42 milk plants or 36 percent associated with the Western milk order during June 2003 would qualify as “small businesses''.
This rule terminates the Western Federal milk marketing order, effective April 1, 2004. It is likely that market conditions would tend to become less orderly or stable. However, it must be assumed that the consequences of the termination of the Western order have been considered by those producers who rejected the proposed amended order, and that possibly other methods have or will be made to replace the stabilizing influence of the marketing order. Less than two-thirds percent of the voting producers in the referendum approved the issuance of the proposed amended order.
The Department is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have a retroactive effect. This rule will not preempt any state or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provisions of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with the law and may request a modification of an order or to be exempted from the order. After a hearing, the Secretary would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has its principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
This order of termination is issued pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act and of the order regulating the handling of the milk in the Western marketing area.
Prior Documents in This Proceeding:
Proposed Termination of Order: Issued January 7, 2004; published January 13, 2004 (69 FR 1957).
Tentative Final Decision: Issued August 8, 2003; published August 18, 2003 (68 FR 49375).
Statement of Consideration
This rule terminates the Western Federal milk marketing order, effective April 1, 2004.
In total, eight comments were received from interested parties. Five comments were from dairy interests regulated under the terms of the Western milk marketing order. Of these five comments, two supported termination and three expressed support for retaining the current Western order.
Three interested parties who are not regulated or pool milk on the Western order also submitted comments. Of these three comments, one comment did not either support or oppose termination and two supported retaining the current Western order.
Comments that supported retaining the current Western order expressed concern for the potential consequences to producers in other Federal milk Start Printed Page 8328marketing orders if the Western order is terminated. In this regard, concerns were offered, most notably, that milk currently pooled on the Western order would seek to be pooled on other orders which may give rise to disorderly marketing conditions in other markets and lower prices received by producers who pool milk under the terms of another milk marketing order.
One comment that supported the termination of the Western order was of the opinion that the current and the proposed amended Western order harmed specific dairy interests in Utah. A second comment supporting termination of the Western order stressed the dairy-farmer orientation of the Federal milk marketing order program and that the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act (AMAA) (the enabling legislation for milk marketing orders) requires the proper endorsement of producers before milk order regulations can be implemented. This comment stressed that the Western order lacks this needed endorsement. In this regard, the comment stressed that the lack of the required two-thirds support of producers leaves the Department with no other recourse than to terminate the Western order so as to be in conformity with the requirements of the AMAA.
Termination of the Western order will remove government enforcement of minimum prices to handlers and to producers that are established by the order. It will also remove other stabilizing features of the regulatory program such as: An impartial audit of handler records to insure payment to dairy farmers and to verify the reported uses of milk; the assurance to farmers of accurate weighing, testing, classification and accounting for milk; and the existence of marketing information to evaluate market performance. Thus, it is likely that market conditions would tend to become less orderly or stable. However, it must be assumed that the consequences of the termination of the Western order have been considered by those producers who rejected the proposed amended order, and that possibly other methods have or will be made to replace the stabilizing influence of the marketing order.
Regardless of the possible economic effects of terminating the Western order, a termination is required by the AMAA. As stated in the proposed termination, less than two-thirds percent of the voting producers in the referendum approved the issuance of the proposed amended order. In these circumstances, where it has been determined that the order should be amended to effectuate the declared policy of the AMAA, and that the amended order was not approved by producers, it is concluded that the existing Western order should be terminated because it is not in conformity with the AMAA.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1135End List of Subjects
It is therefore ordered, that the terms and provisions of the order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Western marketing area (7 CFR part 1135), except § 1135.1 which incorporates the General Provisions in Part 1000, are hereby terminated, effective on April 1, 2004.Start Amendment Part
Accordingly,End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 1135—MILK IN THE WESTERN MARKETING AREAEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation forEnd Amendment Part
2. Sections 1135.2 through 1135.86 and the undesignated center headings in part 1135 are removed, effective on April 1, 2004.End Amendment Part Start Signature
Dated: February 18, 2004.
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 04-3952 Filed 2-19-04; 3:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P