On October 20, 2003, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule Start Printed Page 13079change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the NYSE. On November 24, 2003, the NYSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 3, 2003. The Commission received one comment letter on the proposed rule change. On February 20, 2004, the NYSE filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change, as amended.
I. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
In August 2003, the Exchange reduced the original listing fees applicable to closed-end funds, and in October 2003, the Exchange capped at $75,000 the original listing fees applicable to two or more funds from the same fund family listing at the same time.
The Exchange is now proposing to amend the continuing annual listing fees applicable to closed-end funds by establishing a new continuing fee structure with increased fund family discounts and a new per million share base rate applicable to all closed-end funds.
In establishing a new base rate applicable to all closed-end funds, the Exchange will no longer apply the existing five-tiered continued listing fee structure and, instead, closed-end funds will pay at a rate of $930 per million shares, subject to a minimum annual fee of $25,000. To clarify the applicability of the $25,000 minimum, that amount would actually cover funds with up to 26,881,720 shares outstanding. It is only beyond that size that the multiplication of the per share rate ($930/million) by the shares outstanding would produce a fee in excess of the $25,000 minimum.
The Exchange also proposes to increase and expand the availability of the discounts applicable to fund families with multiple funds listed. As proposed, fund families with between 3 and 14 closed-end funds listed will receive a 5% discount off the calculated continuing annual fee for each fund listed, and those with more than 14 listed closed-end funds will receive a discount of 15%. Currently, fund families with between 5 and 15 closed-end funds listed receive a 5% discount off the calculated continuing annual fee for each fund listed, and those with 16 or more listed closed-end funds receive a discount of 10%.
In a previous filing revising listing fees generally, the Exchange eliminated the fee policy under which shares subject to continuing annual fees for a period of 15 consecutive years became exempt from further fees. At the time, the Exchange noted that it was continuing the 15-year exemption policy for closed-end funds pending further study and revision of the fees charged to closed-end funds generally. Given the new fee structure implemented for closed-end funds under this proposal and the other filings referred to herein, the Exchange has concluded that it is now appropriate to eliminate the 15-year exemption policy for closed-end funds consistent with the amendments made with respect to listed operating companies in December 2002. The Exchange is phasing-in increases in fees for closed-end funds that were previously eligible for the 15-year exemption so that closed-end funds that are affected by the elimination will pay only 50% of increased fees in fiscal year 2004 and 100% in fiscal year 2005 and afterwards.
The impact of the proposed continuing annual fee changes in their entirety on an individual fund will vary depending on a fund's shares outstanding and other circumstances. First of all, the Exchange states that its rule has, and will continue to have, an overall fund family fee cap of $1 million per year. Of the 407 listed closed end funds, the Exchange states that 118 are in fund families covered by the $1 million fee cap. Of the remaining 289 funds, factoring in the net effect of the change to the new per share rate from the existing five-tiered formula, the elimination of the 15-year exemption policy, and the increases in the fund family discounts, the Exchange's analysis (based on the information it currently has on fund shares outstanding) is that 55 funds would experience an increase in continuing annual fees, 150 would experience a decrease, and 84 would experience no net change. Of those that can be expected to experience an increase, the Exchange expects that the average increase would be 15.6% and the median increase 8.2%. The Exchange expects that the maximum increase for any one fund would be 73% (in that case, $44,700). Of the 150 funds the Exchange expects to experience a decrease, the average decrease would be 25.4% and the median decrease would be 28.6%. The maximum decrease for any one fund would be 36% (in that case, $12,000). While some funds would experience an increase in continuing annual fees and others a decrease, the overall impact on the Exchange would be a net decrease in continuing annual fees of approximately $900,000.
II. Summary of Comments
The Commission received one comment letter on the proposal. There were several issues raised by the commenter. First, the commenter  observed that as a long-standing fund not part of a large fund complex, the NYSE's proposed rule change would significantly increase the continuing annual fees that the commenter would be required to pay. Although the commenter did not object to the NYSE's increase in the per-million share rate, the commenter observed that eliminating the 15-year exemption policy would increase the continuing annual fee for the commenter by 57%, and further observed that while this was within the range described by the NYSE, it was significantly above the average and median increases projected by the Exchange. The commenter requested a three-year phase in period for the elimination of the 15-year exemption policy in order to cushion the effect of the fee increase.
In response to the commenter's concerns, the Exchange responded that the increase in the commenter's fees were consistent with the Exchange's estimates of the range of fee increases. The Exchange also noted that the elimination of the 15-year exemption policy was consistent with recent changes to the Exchange's fee structure. Although the Exchange considered a three-year phase in period for the elimination of the 15-year exemption policy unnecessary, the Exchange Start Printed Page 13080proposed a two-year phase in period instead. The Exchange's proposal would therefore result in a company's paying 50% of the fee increase during the first year and 100% of the increase in the second year.
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. In particular, the Commission finds the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act  that an Exchange have rules that provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities. The Commission believes that the NYSE's proposal to increase the listing fees applicable to closed-end funds is consistent with the Act because it is consistent with the Exchange's recent revisions to their fees generally and further provides for a net decrease in fees applicable to funds generally.
After careful consideration of the commenter's concerns about the increases in the fees applicable to the commenter, the Commission finds that the NYSE's determination to phase in the increase in fees over a two-year period is responsive to the commenter's observations that its fees would increase significantly as a result of the elimination of the 15-year exemption policy for closed-end funds. The Commission has also carefully considered the commenters' concerns about the fee increase applicable to closed-end funds that are not part of a larger fund family. The Commission finds that although the commenter's fees will increase by 57%, the increase is within the range identified by the Exchange, and that the fee increases for closed-end funds are commensurate with the Exchange's recent amendments to the fees applicable to listed operating companies, consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.
IV. Amendment No. 2
The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment No. 2 prior to the thirtieth day after notice of the publication in the Federal Register. The Exchange wishes to begin applying the proposed fee changes effective no later than January 1, 2004. The Commission finds that good cause exists to justify accelerated effectiveness to enable the fee change to be imposed no later than at the beginning of the new calendar year. The Commission believes that it is not necessary to separately solicit comment on Amendment 2 prior to approving this proposal because it finds that these changes to the proposed rule language respond to and incorporate suggestions made by the Commission and the commenter to the original proposal. The Commission therefore finds that acceleration of Amendment No. 2 is appropriate.
V. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning Amendment No. 2, including whether the proposed amendments are consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609.
Comments may also be submitted electronically at the following e-mail address: email@example.com. All comment letters should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2003-33. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, comments should be sent in hard copy or by e-mail, but not by both methods. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed amendments that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the amendments between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2003-33 and should be submitted by April 9, 2004.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change and Amendment No. 1 (SR-NYSE-2003-33), is approved, and Amendment No. 2 is approved on an accelerated basis.Start Signature
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
1. See letter from Darla Stuckey, Corporate Secretary, NYSE, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated November 24, 2003 (“Amendment No. 1”). In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange clarified the effect of the proposed rule change on the fees payable by closed-end funds, particularly closed-end funds not part of a fund family.Back to Citation
2. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48833 (December 3, 2003), 68 FR 67717 (SR-NYSE-2003-33).Back to Citation
3. See Letter to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission, from Lawrence J. Hooper, Jr., Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, The Adams Express Company, dated December 23, 2003 (“Adams Letter”).Back to Citation
4. Amendment No. 2 replaces the originally filed Form 19b-4 in its entirety. (“Amendment No. 2”). In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange amended its original proposal to include a two-year phase in for the fees resulting from the elimination of the 15-year exclusion.Back to Citation
5. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48360 (August 18, 2003), 68 FR 51045 (August 25, 2003) (SR-NYSE-2003-22).Back to Citation
6. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48685 (October 23, 2003), 68 FR 61710 (October 29, 2003) (SR-NYSE-2003-32).Back to Citation
7. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47115 (December 31, 2002), 68 FR 1495 (January 10, 2003) (SR-NYSE-2002-62).Back to Citation
8. See note 3, supra.Back to Citation
9. See Adams Letter.Back to Citation
10. In approving this rule, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 04-6189 Filed 3-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P