Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Extension of period to submit comments in response to advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
In a Federal Register document published March 11, 2004, the FTC requested comment on various topics related to §§ 3(2)(C), 3(17)(B), Start Printed Page 188525(c)(1), 5(c)(2), and 13 of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 (“CAN-SPAM Act” or “the Act”). In addition, the FTC requested comment on topics relevant to certain reports to Congress required by additional provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act. In response to a request for an extension of the comment period received April 1, 2004, the Commission has extended the comment period until April 20, 2004.
Comments addressing any aspect of the CAN-SPAM Act (except the Do Not Email Registry Report the FTC must prepare and submit to Congress pursuant to section 9 of the CAN-SPAM Act) must be submitted on or before April 20, 2004. (The deadline for receipt of comments on the Do Not Email Registry Report was March 31, 2004.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goodman, Staff Attorney, (202) 326-3071; or Catherine Harrington-McBride, Staff Attorney, (202) 326-2452; Division of Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The CAN-SPAM Act directs the Commission to issue regulations, not later than 12 months following the enactment of the Act, “defining the relevant criteria to facilitate the determination of the primary purpose of an electronic mail message.” The CAN-SPAM Act also provides discretionary authority for the Commission to issue regulations concerning certain of the Act's other definitions and provisions. Specifically, the Commission is authorized to:
- modify the definition of the term “transactional or relationship message” under the Act “to the extent that such modification is necessary to accommodate changes in electronic mail technology or practices and accomplish the purposes of [the] Act;” 
- modify the 10-business-day period prescribed in the Act for honoring a recipient's opt-out request;
- specify activities or practices as aggravated violations (in addition to those set forth as such in section 5(b) of the CAN-SPAM Act) “if the Commission determines that those activities or practices are contributing substantially to the proliferation of commercial electronic mail messages that are unlawful under subsection [5(a) of the Act]”;  and
- “issue regulations to implement the provisions of this Act.”
On March 11, 2004 the Commission published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPR”) to initiate the mandatory “primary purpose” rulemaking proceeding by soliciting comment on issues relating to that term and its use in the Act. In addition, the ANPR solicited comments on the several areas of discretionary regulation listed above. Finally, the Commission also solicited comment in this ANPR on a variety of topics relevant to certain reports that, pursuant to the mandate of the CAN-SPAM Act, the Commission must issue within the coming two years.
On April 1, 2004 the Commission received a letter from Ronald L. Plesser of Piper Rudnick requesting, on behalf of the American Association of Advertising Agencies, the Association of National Advertisers, the Consumer Bankers Association, the Direct Marketing Association, and the Magazine Publishers of America, that the Commission extend the comment period to April 20, 2004. In support of this request, the letter states that an extension of time would allow the requesting entities more time to contact their members to further evaluate the ANPR. The letter also explains that, in light of upcoming religious holidays, a short extension of time is needed for the requesting entities to adequately present their views.
In response to this request, the Commission has determined to extend the comment period on all topics set forth in the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, except the Do Not Email Registry report, until April 20, 2004.Start Signature
By direction of the Commission.
C. Landis Plummer,
1. CAN-SPAM Act, section 3(2)(C). The term “the primary purpose” is incorporated in the Act's definition of the key term “commercial electronic mail message.” Specifically, “commercial electronic mail message” encompasses “any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service (including content on an Internet website operated for a commercial purpose.)” CAN-SPAM Act, § 3(2)(A) (emphasis supplied).Back to Citation
2. CAN-SPAM Act, section 3(17)(B).Back to Citation
3. CAN-SPAM Act, section 5(c)(1)(A)-(C).Back to Citation
4. CAN-SPAM Act, section 5(c)(2).Back to Citation
5. CAN-SPAM Act, section 13.Back to Citation
7. CAN-SPAM requires the Commission to prepare and submit to Congress four separate reports within the next two years: A report on establishing a “Do Not Email” Registry to be submitted by June 16, 2004; a report on establishing a system for rewarding those who supply information about CAN-SPAM violations by September 16, 2004; a report setting forth a plan for requiring commercial email to be identifiable from its subject line by June 16, 2005: and a report on the effectiveness of CAN-SPAM by December 16, 2005.Back to Citation
8. The deadline for comments on the Do Not Email Registry report was March 31, 2004. The parties that requested extension of the ANPR comment period did not request extension of the comment period on the Do Not E-mail Registry report.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 04-8088 Filed 4-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P