This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Preventing Locks and Crosses in PNP Orders for ITS Trade-Through Exempt Securities by Amending PCXE Rule 7.31
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
14
as of
10/06/2026 at 8:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]
notice is hereby given that on June 3, 2004, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX” or “Exchange”), through its wholly owned subsidiary PCX Equities, Inc. (“PCXE”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,[3]
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,[4]
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend PCXE Rule 7.31 (“Orders and Modifiers”), which governs the Archipelago Exchange (“ArcaEx”), an equities trading facility of PCXE, by modifying the behavior of PNP Orders for ITS Trade-Through Exempt Securities [5]
to systematically prevent such orders from locking and crossing the National Best Bid or Offer (“NBBO”). The text of the proposed rule change appears below. New text is in italics. Deleted text is in brackets.
Rule 7
Equities Trading
Trading Sessions
Rule 7.31(a)-(v)—No change.
(w) PNP Order (Post No Preference). A limit order to buy or sell that is to be
( printed page 34212)
executed in whole or in part on the Corporation, and the portion not so executed is to be ranked in the Arca Book, without routing any portion of the order to another market center; provided, however, the Corporation shall cancel a PNP Order that would lock or cross the NBBO
except as provided in Rule 7.31(w)(1). The NBBO price protection provision set forth in Rule 7.37 will not apply to PNP Orders in Nasdaq securities.
(1) PNP Orders forITS
Trade-Through Exempt Securities (as defined in Rule 7.37). PNP Orders for
ITS
Trade-Through Exempt Securities [(as defined in Rule 7.37)] will not be canceled at the time of order entry if such orders would lock or cross the NBBO.
Such orders will be ranked in the Arca Book in price, time priority with an undisplayed price and size until: (i) Such orders are executed; or (ii) such orders no longer lock or cross the NBBO at which time they would be displayed in the Arca Book and ranked based upon original price and the original order entry time. The lock and cross restrictions set forth in this rule will only apply to bids or offers included in the NBBO that are for greater than 100 shares pursuant to Rule 7.56(d)(2)(E).
PNP Orders in ITS Trade-Through Exempt Securities may be executed at a price no more than three cents ($0.03) away from the NBBO [displayed in the Consolidated Quote].
All PNP Orders whether displayed or undisplayed will execute in price, time priority.
[The NBBO price protection provision set forth in Rule 7.37 will not apply to PNP Orders in Nasdaq securities.]
(x)-(cc)—No change.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Currently, PCXE Rule 7.31(w) establishes that PNP Orders for ITS Trade-Through Exempt Securities will not be canceled at the time of order entry if the PNP Order would lock or cross the NBBO. The Exchange seeks to modify the rule to provide that PNP Orders in ITS Trade-Through Exempt Securities will not be displayed in the instance when the order will lock or cross the NBBO. In such cases, the PNP Orders would remain in the Arca Book ranked in price, time priority but will not be displayed until the order: (i) is executed; or (ii) no longer locks or crosses the NBBO at which time they would be displayed in the Arca Book and ranked based upon the original price and the original order entry time.
Pursuant to PCXE Rule 7.56(d)(2)(E), the lock/cross restrictions do not apply to 100 share markets. Thus, this proposed rule change regarding the display of PNP Orders in ITS Trade-Through Exempt Securities will apply only to bids and offers of more than 100 shares. Therefore, if the PNP Order would lock or cross a bid or offer of 100 shares, the Exchange would display the PNP Order in the Arca Book in price, time priority.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) [6]
of the Act, in general, and further the objectives of section 6(b)(5),[7]
in particular, because it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system, and to protect investors and the public interest. In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with provisions of section 11A(a)(1)(B) [8]
of the Act, which states that new data processing and communications techniques create the opportunity for more efficient and effective market operations.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
(i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest;
(ii) Impose any significant burden on competition; and
(iii) Become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act [9]
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.[10]
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative period to implement the proposed rule change as soon as the technical changes are completed. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative period is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because it will allow the PCX to immediately provide a mechanism to prevent Locks and Crosses in trading certain ITS securities, consistent with the ITS Plan.[11]
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
( printed page 34213)
Send an e-mail torule-comments@sec.gov.
Please include File Number SR-PCX-2004-52 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2004-52. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (
http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Room. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2004-52 and should be submitted on or before July 9, 2004.
June 8, 2004.
* * * * *
* * * * *
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[12]
11.
For purposes of waiving the operative period date of this proposal only, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).