This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Seeks Comment on Express Consolidation, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Preemption of Florida Telemarketing Rules
Comments are due November 17, 2004, and reply comments are due December 2, 2004.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Seeks Comment on Express Consolidation, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Preemption of Florida Telemarketing Rules
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
18
as of
09/11/2026 at 4:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
This document seeks comment on a petition for declaratory ruling filed by Express Consolidation, Inc., asking the Commission to preempt a Florida telemarketing law, Florida Statute, section 501.059 which restricts the making of certain telephonic sales calls to Florida citizens.
DATES:
Comments are due November 17, 2004, and reply comments are due December 2, 2004.
ADDRESSES:
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
This is a summary of the Commission's
Public Notice, CG Docket No. 02-278, DA 04-3186, released October 4, 2004. Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments in this proceeding on or before November 17, 2004, and reply comments may be filed on or before December 2, 2004. When filing comments, please reference CG Docket No. 02-278. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.
See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121, May 1,1998. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to
http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions for e-mail comments, commenters should send e-mail to
ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, “get form <your e-mail address>.” A sample form and directions will be sent in reply.
Parties who choose to file by paper must send an original and four (4) copies of each filing. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by electronic media, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). The Commission's contractor, Natek, Inc., will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings or electronic media for the Commission's Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue,
( printed page 61382)
NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. Commercial and electronic media sent by overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW-B204, Washington, DC 20554.
This proceeding shall be treated as a “permit but disclose” proceeding in accordance with the Commission's
ex parte
rules, 47 CFR 1.1200. Persons making oral
ex parte
presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
See47 CFR 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
ex parte
presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418-0270. This document may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Customers may contact BCPI, Inc. at their Web site:
www.bcpiweb.com
or by calling 1-800-378-3160.
To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov
or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). The
Public Notice
can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format (PDF) at
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb.
Synopsis
On July 28, 2004, Express Consolidation, Inc. (Express or Petitioner) filed a petition for declaratory ruling asking the Commission to preempt a Florida telemarketing law, Florida Statute, section 501.059 (Florida Statute). According to Petitioner, Express has been charged in a complaint by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services with violating the Florida Statute, which restricts the making of telephonic sales calls to Florida citizens whose names appear on the state's quarterly “no sales solicitation calls listing.” The Florida law also restricts the use of automatic dialing systems and artificial or prerecorded messages to make sales calls. Express contends that the Florida Statute is inconsistent with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by placing more onerous restrictions on the making of interstate telephone calls by a tax-exempt nonprofit organization. Express indicates that, unlike the Florida Statute, the TCPA exempts calls made by tax-exempt nonprofit organizations from the restrictions on “telephone solicitations.” Express further explains that the calls that are the basis of the state's enforcement action are made on behalf of Express, a nonprofit corporation with offices in Florida, by a California company. Express maintains that the TCPA authorizes a state to implement more restrictive regulations only with respect to intrastate calls; therefore, the state law should be preempted.