This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
The corrections to the final rule are effective on October 28, 2004.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
16
as of
10/07/2026 at 2:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION:
Final rule; correcting amendments.
SUMMARY:
On May 28, 2004, FRA published a final rule, which increased the minimum and aggravated maximum civil monetary penalties it applies when assessing a civil penalty for a violation of railroad safety statutes and regulations under its authority. In preparing that final rule for publication, six minor typographical errors were made. These amendments correct the typographical errors published in the final rule.
DATES:
The corrections to the final rule are effective on October 28, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa L. Porter, Trial Attorney, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC 20003, (202) 493-6034,
Melissa.Porter@fra.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The errors included in the final rule published on May 28, 2004 (69 FR 30591) consisted of twice listing incorrect appendices to be amended (appendix A to part 221 instead of appendix C; and appendix A to part 241 instead of appendix B), inserting the incorrect monetary amount in one amendment (to part 235), and listing the incorrect section to be amended in (§ 231.11 instead of § 233.11) another amendment. All of the typographical errors were obvious from their context. FRA is correcting these minor errors so that the final rule clearly conforms to FRA's intent.