This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
46
as of
08/14/2026 at 6:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
This rule implements the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996. The Commission is adopting a rule adjusting for inflation the maximum amount of civil monetary penalties under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
February 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard A. Levine, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, at (202) 942-0890, or M. Owen Donley III, Senior Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, at (202) 942-0998.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This rule implements the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (“DCIA”).[1]
The DCIA amended the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (“FCPIAA”) [2]
to require that each Federal agency adopt regulations at least once every four years, adjusting for inflation the maximum amount of the civil monetary penalties (“CMPs”) under the statutes administered by the agency.[3]
A civil monetary penalty (“CMP”) is defined in relevant part as any penalty, fine, or other sanction that: (1) Is for a specific amount, or has a maximum amount, as provided by Federal law; and (2) is assessed or enforced by an agency in an administrative proceeding or by a Federal court pursuant to Federal law.[4]
This definition covers the monetary penalty provisions contained in the statutes administered by the Commission. In addition, this definition encompasses the civil monetary penalties that may be imposed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) in its disciplinary proceedings pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D).[5]
The DCIA requires that the penalties be adjusted by the cost-of-living adjustment set forth in section 5 of the FCPIAA.[6]
The cost-of-living adjustment is defined in the FCPIAA as the percentage by which the U.S. Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers (“CPI-U”) [7]
for the month of June for the year preceding the adjustment exceeds the CPI-U for the month of June for the year in which the amount of the penalty was last set or adjusted pursuant to law.[8]
The statute contains specific rules for rounding each increase based on the size of the penalty.[9]
Agencies do not have discretion whether to adjust a maximum CMP, or the methods used to determine the adjustment. Although the DCIA imposes a 10 percent maximum increase for each penalty for the first adjustment pursuant thereto, that limitation does not apply to the adjustments subsequently made.
The Commission administers four statutes that provide for civil monetary penalties: The Securities Act of 1933; the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; the Investment Company Act of 1940; and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 provides the PCAOB (over which the Commission has jurisdiction) authority to levy civil monetary penalties in its disciplinary proceedings.[10]
Penalties administered by the Commission were last adjusted by rules effective February 2, 2001.[11]
The DCIA requires the civil monetary penalties to be adjusted for inflation at least once every four years. Therefore, the Commission is directed by statute to increase the maximum amount of each penalty by the appropriate formulated amount.
Accordingly, the Commission is adopting an amendment to 17 CFR part 201 to add section 201.1003 and Table III to Subpart E, increasing the amount of each civil monetary penalty authorized by the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The adjustments set forth in the amendment apply to violations occurring after the effective date of the amendment.
II. Summary of the Calculation
To explain the inflation adjustment calculation for CMP amounts that were last adjusted in 2001, we will use the following example. Under the current provisions, the Commission may impose a maximum CMP of $1,200,000 for certain insider trading violations by a controlling person. To determine the new CMP amounts under the amendment, first we determine the appropriate CPI-U for June of the calendar year preceding the year of adjustment. Because we are adjusting CMPs in 2005, we use the CPI-U for June of 2004, which was 189.7. We must also determine the CPI-U for June of the year the CMP was last adjusted for inflation. Because the Commission last adjusted this CMP in 2001, we use the CPI-U for June of 2001, which was 178.0.
Second, we calculate the cost-of-living adjustment or inflation factor. To do this we divide the CPI for June of 2004 (189.7) by the CPI for June of 2001 (178.0). Our result is 1.0657.
Third, we calculate the raw inflation adjustment. To do this, we multiply the maximum penalty amounts by the inflation factor. In our example, $1,200,000 multiplied by the inflation factor of 1.0657 equals $1,278,840.
Fourth, we round the raw inflation amounts according to the rounding rules in Section 5(a) of the FCPIAA. Since we round only the increased amount, we calculate the increased amount by subtracting the current maximum penalty amounts from the raw maximum inflation adjustments. Accordingly, the increased amount for the maximum penalty in our example is $78,840 (
i.e., $1,278,840 less $1,200,000). Under the rounding rules, if the
penalty
is greater than $200,000, we round the
increase
to the nearest multiple of $25,000. Therefore, the maximum penalty increase in our example is $75,000.
Fifth, we add the rounded increase to the maximum penalty amount last set or adjusted. In our example, $1,200,000 plus $75,000 yields a maximum
( printed page 7607)
inflation adjustment penalty amount of $1,275,000.[12]
III. Related Matters
A. Administrative Procedure Act—Immediate Effectiveness of Final Rule
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), to issue a final rule without public notice and comment, an agency must find good cause that notice and comment are impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to public interest.[13]
Because the Commission is required by statute to adjust the civil monetary penalties within its jurisdiction by the cost-of-living adjustment formula set forth in section 5 of the FCPIAA, the Commission finds that good cause exists to dispense with public notice and comment pursuant to the notice and comment provisions of the APA.[14]
Specifically, the Commission finds that because the adjustment is mandated by Congress and does not involve the exercise of Commission discretion or any policy judgments, public notice and comment is unnecessary.[15]
Under the DCIA, agencies must make the required inflation adjustment to civil monetary penalties: (1) According to a very specific formula in the statute; and (2) within four years of the last inflation adjustment. Agencies have no discretion as to the amount of the adjustment and have limited discretion as to the timing of the adjustment, in that agencies are required to make the adjustment at least once every four years. The regulation discussed herein is ministerial, technical, and noncontroversial. Furthermore, because the regulation concerns penalties for conduct that is already illegal under existing law, there is no need for affected parties to have thirty days prior to the effectiveness of the regulation and amendments during which to adjust their conduct. Accordingly, the Commission believes that there is good cause to make this regulation effective immediately upon publication.
B. Cost-Benefit Analysis
The Commission is sensitive to the costs and benefits that result from its rules. This regulation merely adjusts civil monetary penalties in accordance with inflation as required by the DCIA, and has no impact on disclosure or compliance costs. Furthermore, Congress, in mandating the inflationary adjustments, has already determined that any possible increase in costs is justified by the overall benefits of such adjustments.
The regulation is in the interest of the public and in furtherance of investor protection. The benefit provided by the inflationary adjustment to the maximum civil monetary penalties is that of maintaining the level of deterrence effectuated by the civil monetary penalties, and not allowing such deterrent effect to be diminished by inflation.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any collection of information requirements as defined by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 as amended.[16]
As required by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, the maximum amounts of all civil monetary penalties under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are adjusted for inflation in accordance with Table III to this subpart. The adjustments set forth in Table III apply to violations occurring after February 14, 2005.
Table III to Subpart E.—Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustments
U.S. Code citation
Civil monetary penalty description
Year penalty amount was last adjusted
Maximum penalty amount pursuant to last adjustment
5.
The Commission may by order affirm, modify, remand, or set aside sanctions, including civil monetary penalties, imposed by the PCAOB.
See
section 107(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 15 U.S.C. 7217. The Commission may enforce such orders in Federal district court pursuant to Section 21(e) of the Exchange Act. As a result, penalties assessed by the PCAOB in its disciplinary proceedings should be considered penalties “enforced” by the Commission for purposes of the Act.
12.
The adjustments in Table III to subpart E of part 201 reflect that the operation of the statutorily mandated computation, together with rounding rules, does not result in any adjustment to certain penalties. These particular penalties will be subject to slightly different treatment when calculating the next adjustment. Under the statute, when we next adjust these particular penalties, we will be required to use the CPI-U for June of the year when these particular penalties were “last adjusted,” rather than the CPI-U for 2005.
15.
A regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (“RFA”) is required only when an agency must publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking for notice and comment.
See 5 U.S.C. 603. As noted above, notice and comment are not required for this final rule. Therefore, the RFA does not apply.