Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) governing the procurement program for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns (SDVOSB). The final rule retains the interim rule with changes. The final rule deletes commissary or exchange resale items from a list of actions excluded from the SDVOSB program and modifies protest procedures. The final rule also includes technical corrections adding service-disabled veteran-owned small, veteran-owned small, and HUBZone small business concerns to the list of socioeconomic programs, and makes changes to the Optional Form 347, Order for Supplies and Services, Standard Form 1447, Solicitation/Contract, and Standard Form 1449, Start Printed Page 14951Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items.
Effective Date: March 23, 2005.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The FAR Secretariat at (202) 501-4755 for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of content, contact Ms. Rhonda Cundiff, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-0044. Please cite FAC 2005-02, FAR case 2004-002.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
This FAR case was opened to implement section 308 of the Veterans Benefit Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-183, 15 U.S.C. 657f), “Procurement Program for Small Business Concerns Owned and Controlled by Service-Disabled Veterans.” The law provides that contracting officers may: award contracts on the basis of competition restricted to service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSB) if there is a reasonable expectation that two or more SDVOSBs will submit offers and that the award can be made at a fair market price; or award a sole source contract to a responsible SDVOSB when there is not a reasonable expectation that two or more SDVOSBs would submit offers, the anticipated contract price (including options) will not exceed $5 million (for manufacturing) or $3 million otherwise, and the contract award can be made at a fair and reasonable price. The rule also limited use of SDVOSB procurement authority to procurements that would not otherwise be made from Federal Prison Industries (section 4124 or 4125 of Title 18.
An interim rule was published in the Federal Register at 69 FR 25274, May 5, 2004, and invited comments by July 6, 2004. The rule amended the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement Pub. L. 108-183, 15 U.S.C. 657f. Thirty-five (35) comments from 17 respondents were received. The Small Business Administration (SBA) published an interim rule in the Federal Register at 69 FR 25262, May 5, 2004. The SBA's final rule revises protest procedures as a result of public comments it received. Additionally, on February 24, 2005, SBA published an interim rule detailing the appeal procedures, as a result of a public comment it received. Therefore, in order to avoid any potential conflict between the FAR and SBA's final rule on appeals and to streamline the regulations, FAR 19.307 is revised by shortening the protest appeal discussion to be a cross reference to 13 CFR part 134. The Councils considered all of the public comments and recommendations on the FAR rule in developing this final rule. The specific FAR comments and the corresponding response are summarized below.
a. Exclusions at FAR 19.1404. Three commenters expressed concern that the exclusions from the SDVOSB procurement program specified in paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) of FAR 19.1404 go beyond those contained in Pub. L. 108-183, 15 U.S.C. 657f.
Disposition. Partially accepted. The Councils have removed the exclusion in paragraph (e) for commissary or exchange resale items, as these items are subject to separate statutes and regulations. The Councils determined that the remaining exclusions are appropriate. The exclusions at FAR 19.1404(b) and (c) address orders placed against indefinite delivery contracts and Federal Supply Schedules. The SDVOSB procurement program applies to the award of a contract; therefore, the program will have been already considered in the award of the underlying contracts and is not applicable to the placement of orders under those contracts.
The exclusion in 19.1404(d) for the 8(a) program is consistent with Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations. Under these regulations, requirements are offered by Agencies and accepted by the SBA for performance under the 8(a) Business Development Program. To ensure the integrity of the business development aspects of the program, normally the requirement is retained for exclusive 8(a) participation, but may be released by the SBA as indicated in FAR 19.1404(d).
b. Delay implementation until FPDS-NG is updated. One commenter questioned whether the effective date of the rule was premature given that the background section of the rule stated that the Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation (FPDS-NG) has not yet been updated to capture information regarding awards under the program.
Disposition. Not accepted. The SDVOSB program was mandated by statute. The benefits under this program cannot be delayed because of underlying Government data reporting systems. The Councils anticipate and expect that contracting officers will pursue their SDVOSB goals, notwithstanding the need for the FPDS-NG to be updated to reflect the SDVOSB procurement authorities.
c. Rule establishes unauthorized prerequisite to sole source awards to SDVOSB. Three commenters expressed concern that the interim rule changed the intent of Pub. L. 108-183, 15 U.S.C. 657f, by establishing in FAR 19.1405 set aside procedures for SDVOSB that must be satisfied before a sole-source award to a SDVOSB can be made. The commenters recommend that FAR 19.1405 be deleted.
Disposition. Not accepted. The rule is consistent with the statute. It does not establish a requirement that a contracting officer satisfy the set-aside requirement before being able to award a sole source contract. If market research indicates that there is only one SDVOSB source capable of satisfying the requirement at a fair and reasonable price, the contracting officer may award on a sole-source basis. If market research indicates two or more SDVOSBs are capable of fulfilling the requirement, the contracting officer may set-aside the requirement. In the event where only one acceptable SDVOSB offer is received in response to the set-aside, the contracting officer may make award to that offeror.
d. No prohibition against SDVOSB sole source awards below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT). One commenter expressed concern that there is no explicit prohibition against use of a SDVOSB sole source below the SAT similar to the HUBZone coverage at FAR 19.1306(a)(4). This commenter notes that since the statutory language for both the HUBZone and SDVOSB programs is silent regarding whether sole-source can be used below the SAT and the other criteria for use are the same in both statutes, SDVOSB sole-source awards below the SAT should be prohibited as they are for HUBZones.
Disposition. Not accepted. To ensure that agencies have the broadest set of options to aggressively pursue the statutory 3% contracting goal for SDVOSBs, the Councils did not include in the interim rule a prohibition on sole source awards under the SAT. This is consistent with the SBA interim rule that provides for SDVOSB sole source awards under the SAT. As the commenter notes, there is nothing in the statute that prohibits sole source awards under the SAT, and the Councils do not believe that there is any compelling justification for revising the final rules in this respect since such a change would only limit opportunities for SDVOSBs. The Councils recognize the different regulatory treatment of HUBZone sole source awards under the SAT, but changes to the HUBZone program are outside the scope of the current case.
e. Require SDVOSB Certification. Two commenters recommended that SDVOSB status be certified by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) or Start Printed Page 14952the Department of Defense (DoD) to avoid fraud and abuse.
Disposition. Not accepted. The SBA, which has the statutory authority to administer the SDVOSB program, has determined that SDVOSB status should be on a self-representation basis. If the disability status of the owner of a firm is challenged, the SBA will rely on existing Department of Veteran Affairs or DoD determinations regarding the owner's status as a veteran or service-disabled veteran (see FAR 19.307).
f. Establish a SDVOSB Mentor-Protégé Program. One commenter recommended that the final rule establish guidelines for a SDVOSB Mentor-Protégé Program similar to the SBA's 8(a) regulations (13 CFR 124.520). The same commenter recommended that the final rule establish provisions to award SDVOSB set-aside contracts to SDVOSB Mentor-Protégé joint ventures very similar to SBA's 8(a) Mentor-Protégé joint ventures (13 CFR 124.513).
Disposition. Not accepted. The SBA has authority under the Small Business Act to administer the 8(a) Mentor-Protégé Program. SBA current regulations do not provide for an SDVOSB Mentor-Protégé program. Therefore, this recommendation falls outside the scope of this rule.
g. Change the threshold for the nonmanufacturer rule. One commenter recommended changes to the “nonmanufacturing rule” to either exclude SDVOSBs from the $25,000 restriction at 19.102(f)(7)(i)(B) or raise the threshold to $1 million.
Disposition. Not accepted. The SBA has exclusive authority to establish the threshold, which is set at $25,000. Therefore, the recommendation falls outside of the scope of this rule.
h. Monitoring of Subcontracting SDVOSB goal. Two commenters recommended SBA take the following steps to improve compliance with SDVOSB subcontracting plans.
- Base SBA contractor reviews on compliance risks, such as size of the contract, date of the last review, and previous ratings and send the results of the reviews to contracting officers, especially when the ratings are marginal. SBA should produce an annual list of prime contractors who meet their small business plans by category.
- The primes who fail to meet their plans for two consecutive years should be barred from federal contracting until a suitable corrective action plan is received and approved. Or, if this is not feasible, enforce FAR 52.219-16, “Liquidated Damages—Subcontracting Plan.”
- Prime contractors who consistently meet their subcontracting plans should be rewarded by receiving priority in future contracts. FAR 52.219-10, Incentive Subcontracting Program should be vigorously used where applicable.
Disposition. Partially accepted. SBA has taken action to implement the first recommendation. The Councils do not believe that the debarment action is feasible, since debarment is a severe sanction taken only when no other remedy is available to protect the Government's interests. Liquidated damages are assessed under FAR 52.219-16, which establishes a standard of willful or intentional actions to frustrate the contract's subcontracting plan before the damages can be assessed. Regarding affording priority to contractors who consistently meet goals, a contractor who receives a positive past performance evaluation for achieving its subcontracting goals has a better chance of receiving future contracts. Conversely, a contractor who fails to make good faith efforts is subject to negative past performance evaluations (which could affect its ability to receive future contracts). The Councils agree that the Incentive Subcontracting Program should be vigorously used where applicable, but no change to the rule for this, or the other recommendations in the comment, is necessary.
i. 8(a)/SDB program.
- Allow Migration of work from 8(a) to SDVOSB. One commenter recommended that the final rule allow business concerns in the 8(a) SDB Program to migrate work from that program to the SDVOSB Procurement Program if eligible, and allow SDVOSB concerns to migrate work to the 8(a) SDB Program if eligible.
Disposition. Not accepted. The two programs have different purposes. The 8(a) program is a business development program. The SDVOSB program is a procurement mechanism to enhance Federal contracting opportunities for SDVOSBs. Given the different purposes of these two programs, allowing migration from one program into another would adversely impact both programs by limiting business development opportunities available for 8(a) firms and procurement opportunities for SDVOSB firms.
- Provide equal consideration as 8(a) SDB Program including goals. Two commenters suggested that SDVOSB concerns be provided equal consideration as those business concerns in the 8(a) Business Development Program, including equivalent government-wide procurement goals.
- Disposition. Not accepted. It is important to note that the 8(a) Program is a business development program. While the 8(a) Program offers a broad scope of assistance to socially and economically disadvantaged small businesses, the SDVOSB Program strictly pertains to benefits in Federal contracting. Congress authorized sole source awards to 8(a) firms, even when multiple firms can satisfy the requirement, as a business development tool. Further, Congress established separate Governmentwide goals for participation by Small Disadvantaged Businesses and SDVOSBs. Although Congress did not establish a mandatory goal for 8(a) small businesses, as a matter of policy, the SBA negotiates an 8(a) goal with each Federal Agency. Consequently, the comments are outside the scope of this rule.
j. Expand authority for sole source awards. Three commenters recommended that the final rule allow a sole source award to an SDVOSB up to the 8(a) sole-source dollar thresholds regardless of whether there are two or more SDVOSB competitors capable of satisfying the requirement.
Disposition. Not accepted. The statute specifically states that a sole source award is allowed only when market research establishes that only one SDVOSB is capable of meeting the Government's requirements at a fair and reasonable price, and only when the award price will not exceed $3 million ($5 million for manufacturing.)
k. Establish an Order of Precedence. Two commenters expressed concern that the interim rule did not establish the order of precedence for SDVOSB set-asides relative to the 8(a) and HUBZone set-aside programs.
Disposition. Not accepted. The FAR rule implements Pub. L. 108-183, 15 U.S.C. 657f, as written. The statute established a discretionary set-aside and sole-source authority for SDVOSBs. The statute did not establish a preference for SDVOSBs relative to the 8(a) or HUBZone programs.
l. Provide for a Price Evaluation Adjustment. Four commenters recommended that SDVOSB concerns be entitled to the same 10% price evaluation adjustment when competing for Government opportunities as established in the 8(a) program under the FAR clause at 52.219-23, Notice of Price Evaluation Adjustment for Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns. One commenter recommended that a SDVOSB should be considered a Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB).Start Printed Page 14953
Disposition. Not accepted. There is no statutory authority to afford SDVOSBs the same price evaluation adjustment as certain SDBs, whereas the price evaluation adjustment for certain SDBs was authorized by section 7102 of Pub. L. 103-355. An SDVOSB can be certified as an SDB if it meets the eligibility criteria established by SBA.
m. Replace “may” with “shall”. Four commenters expressed concern that the order of precedence established in 19.800(e), 19.501(c), 19.1305(a) and the “may set aside” and “shall set-aside” language make the Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) the lesser priority relative to the other set-aside programs. These commenters request change in language at 19.1405 and that the words “shall set-aside” be used in every place that “may set-aside” is found.
n. Apply a citizenship restriction. One commenter suggested that the Public Law should be written to state that it is restricted to those U.S. Veterans that are also citizens of the United States and not dual citizenship individuals living abroad.
o. Reassign Advocacy Responsibility for the Regulatory Flexibility Act. One commenter suggested replacing the Chief Counsel at SBA with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as the senior reporting agency for advocacy responsibility under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Disposition. Partially accepted. Under the authority of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, SBA's Chief Counsel for Advocacy reviews Regulatory Flexibility Act analyses. In addition, OMB reviews as a matter of course the analyses prior to publication of any rule. Accordingly, existing procedure already implements the intent of this suggestion, and no further action is required. The Chief Counsel for Advocacy's authority is statutory and cannot be changed by this regulation.
p. Reserve 25% of all procurement actions for SDVOSB. One commenter suggested that the rule be changed to encourage agencies to set aside 25% of their procurements for competition among SDVOSB. To ensure achievement of this goal, the commenter recommended that the rule provide for—
1. Including in all contracts over $15 million a requirement that a contractor set aside a portion of the work for an SDVOSB;
2. GSA notification to agencies that fail to meet the goal;
3. Publication in the Federal Register of a list of agencies that fail to meet the goal during the fiscal year and the corrective actions those agencies will take during the following fiscal year to meet the goal;
4. Establishment of an Office of Economic Advocacy in OMB to monitor, along with SBA and GSA, compliance with agency achievement of the goal and to report to the President and Congress on the climate in America for small businesses;
5. Debarment of any contractor that fails to meet the 25% goal for two consecutive fiscal years; and
6. Suspension of the contracting officer warrant of any contracting officer responsible for awarding a contract that results in an agency not meeting the goal.
Disposition. Not accepted. The Councils are unclear as to whether the commenter is advocating establishing goals based on dollars or actions. If the commenter is advocating dollar goal changes, a Governmentwide goal for each small business category is established pursuant to the Small Business Act. The goal for small business concerns in general is 23% of the total value of all prime contracts awarded each fiscal year. A goal of not less than 3% of the total value of all prime contract and subcontract awards for each fiscal year has been established for SDVOSB concerns. It is beyond the scope of this rule, and impracticable, to establish a 25% goal of procurements for SDVOSB.
If the commenter is advocating goals for actions, the Councils believe that such a change would not result in a meaningful measure of contracting opportunities given the high volume of actions at small-dollar amounts. We do note that the rule provides contracting officers the authority to make sole source awards or set aside procurements in order to meet the Governmentwide goal of awarding 3% of the procurement dollars to SDVOSBs.
The Councils believe that the recommended oversight and remedial actions are outside the scope of the case. However, agency and contractor achievement of goals is already being monitored by SBA, which is already required to report agency achievement of small business goals, established by the President pursuant to the Small Business Act, on an annual basis to Congress and OMB.
q. Include SDVOSB as an Evaluation Point. One commenter suggested that FAR 19.1406, Sole source awards for service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, be revised to require that RFPs include SDVOSB as an evaluation point for procurements in excess of $15M during the contract award period; “where the procurement is in excess of $15,000,000 a copy of the source selection evaluation guidance will be made public for inspection and review by GSA, SBA;” and “notification to the Office of Economic Advocacy in OMB.”
Disposition. Not accepted. Although the commenter refers to FAR 19.1406, which pertains to sole-source SDVOSB awards, the Councils believe the commenter is recommending a source selection evaluation factor for SDVOSB subcontracting be required in all competitive procurements above $15 million. General evaluation factors are identified in the FAR. Although there is no specific requirement to include SDVOSB participation as an evaluation factor, past performance is required to be evaluated in virtually all source selections. This past performance data used is derived from FAR 42.1502(a), which requires an assessment of contractor performance against, and efforts to achieve, the goals identified in the small business subcontracting plan when the contract includes the FAR clause at 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, which includes goals for SDVOSB participation. In addition, all solicitations that require a subcontracting plan will require agencies to negotiate acceptable goals for each small business category, including SDVOSBs. Accordingly, existing regulations already accommodate evaluation of past and proposed SDVOSB participation.
All evaluation factors are included in the solicitation; there are no factors that are not identified. Involvement of GSA in the review of these factors would be duplicative and inefficient. SBA representatives and Agency small business specialists review and make recommendations on solicitations and source selection plans. GSA has no oversight authority on Agency acquisitions.
With regard to establishing a new Office of Economy Advocacy in OMB, the comment is beyond the scope of the rule.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, Start Printed Page 14954dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., applies to this final rule. The Councils prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and it is summarized as follows.
This final rule revises the Federal Acquisition Regulation in order to comply with recently enacted Public Law 108-183, Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 (Dec. 16, 2003), Section 308, Procurement Program for Small Business Concerns Owned and Controlled by Service-Disabled Veterans to allow for discretionary set-aside and sole source procurement authority for service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) concerns. The objective is to provide Federal contracting officials a means to improve their performance toward the statutorily mandated 3% government-wide goal for procurement from SDVOSBs. The changes may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., because the law provides that the contracting officer may use the set-aside and sole source procurement authority when contracting with SDVOSB concerns. Although the percentage of service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses is small, the set aside and sole source procurement authority will have a small impact on other small businesses.
Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the FAR Secretariat. The FAR Secretariat has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does apply; however, the changes to FAR do not impose additional information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4, 5, 13, 15, 19, 42, 44,and 53End List of Subjects Start Signature
Dated: March 16, 2005.
Rodney P. Lantier
Director, Contract Policy Division.
Interim Rule Adopted as Final With ChangesStart Amendment Part
Accordingly, DoD, GSA, and NASA adopt the interim rule amendingEnd Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation forEnd Amendment Part Start Part
PART 4—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERSEnd Part Start Amendment Part
2. Amend section 4.502 by revising paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
(3) Facilitate access to Government acquisition opportunities by small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns;
PART 5—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONSEnd Part Start Amendment Part
3. Amend section 5.503 by revising the second sentence in paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(a) * * *
(1) * * * Contracting officers shall give small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns maximum opportunity to participate in these acquisitions.
PART 13—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURESEnd Part Start Amendment Part
4. Amend section 13.002 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) Improve opportunities for small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns to obtain a fair proportion of Government contracts;
PART 15—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATIONEnd Part Start Amendment Part
5. Amend section 15.404-4 by revising the first sentence in paragraph (d)(1)(iii) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Federal socioeconomic programs. This factor measures the degree of support given by the prospective contractor to Federal socioeconomic programs, such as those involving small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, women-owned small business concerns, veteran-owned, HUBZone, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, handicapped sheltered workshops, and energy conservation. * * *
6. Amend section 15.407-2 by revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(d) * * *
(2) A description of factors to be used in evaluating the proposed program, such as capability, capacity, availability of small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns for subcontracting, establishment of new facilities in or near labor surplus areas, delivery or performance schedules, control of technical and schedule interfaces, proprietary processes, technical superiority or exclusiveness, and technical risks involved.
PART 19—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMSEnd Part Start Amendment Part
7. Amend section 19.307 by—End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
a. Removing from paragraph (e) “Contracting, U.S.” and adding “Contracting AA/GC, U.S.” in its place;End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
b. Revising paragraph (f);End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
c. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (h);End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
d. Revising paragraph (i); andEnd Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
e. Removing paragraphs (j) through (m).End Amendment Part
The revised text read as follows:
(f) The referral letter must include information pertaining to the solicitation that may be necessary for SBA to determine timeliness and standing, including the solicitation number; the name, address, telephone number and facsimile number of the contracting officer; whether the contract was sole-source or set-aside; whether the protestor submitted an offer; whether the protested concern was the apparent successful offeror; when the protested concern submitted its offer (i.e., made the self-representation that it was a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern); whether the procurement was conducted using sealed bid or negotiated procedures; the bid opening date, if applicable; when Start Printed Page 14955the protest was submitted; when the protester received notification about the apparent successful offeror, if applicable; and whether a contract has been awarded.
(h) * * * When making its determinations of veteran, service-disabled veteran, or service-disabled veteran with a permanent and severe disability status, the SBA will rely upon determinations made by the Department of Veteran's Affairs, Department of Defense determinations, or such determinations identified by documents provided by the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. * * *
(i) SBA will notify the contracting officer, the protester, and the protested concern of its determination. The determination is effective immediately and is final unless overturned on appeal by SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) pursuant to 13 CFR part 134.
8. Amend section 19.1404 by—End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
a. Adding at the end of paragraph (c) “or”;End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
b. Removing from paragraph (d) “; or” and adding a period at the end of the sentence; andEnd Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
c. Removing paragraph (e).End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 42—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICESEnd Part Start Amendment Part
9. Amend section 42.302 by revising paragraphs (a)(52) through (a)(55) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(a) * * *
(52) Review, evaluate, and approve plant or division-wide small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business master subcontracting plans.
(53) Obtain the contractor's currently approved company- or division-wide plans for small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business subcontracting for its commercial products, or, if there is no currently approved plan, assist the contracting officer in evaluating the plans for those products.
(54) Assist the contracting officer, upon request, in evaluating an offeror's proposed small, small disadvantaged women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business subcontracting plans, including documentation of compliance with similar plans under prior contracts.
(55) By periodic surveillance, ensure the contractor's compliance with small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business subcontracting plans and any labor surplus area contractual requirements; maintain documentation of the contractor's performance under and compliance with these plans and requirements; and provide advice and assistance to the firms involved, as appropriate.
10. Amend section 42.501 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) Postaward orientation is encouraged to assist small business, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns (see Part 19).
11. Amend section 42.502 by revising paragraphs (i) and (j) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(i) Contractor's status, if any, as a small business, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, or service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern;
(j) Contractor's performance history with small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business subcontracting programs;
PART 44—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURESEnd Part Start Amendment Part
12. Amend section 44.303 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(e) Policies and procedures pertaining to small business concerns, including small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns;
PART 53—FormsEnd Part
13. Amend section 53.212 by removing “End Amendment Part
14. Amend section 53.213 by—End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
a. Removing from paragraph (a) “End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
b. Removing from paragraph (f) “End Amendment Part
15. Amend section 53.214 by removing from paragraph (d) “End Amendment Part
16. Amend section 53.236-1 by removing from paragraph (e) “End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
17. Revise section 53.301-1447 to read as follows:End Amendment Part
18. Revise section 53.301-1449 to read as follows:End Amendment Part
19. Revise section 53.302-347 to read as follows:End Amendment Part
[FR Doc. 05-5656 Filed 3-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S