Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
Cigarette lighters may present an unreasonable risk of injury due to mechanical malfunction of some lighters. In November 2001, the Commission received a petition from the Lighter Association, Inc. asking the Commission to adopt the voluntary “Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Lighters” (ASTM F-400) as a mandatory standard under the Consumer Product Safety Act (“CPSA”). On November 30, 2004 the Commission voted to grant the petition. This advance notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPR”) initiates a rulemaking proceeding under the CPSA. One result of the proceeding could be issuance of a rule requiring that cigarette lighters meet certain safety requirements. The Commission solicits written comments concerning the risks of injury associated with the mechanical malfunction of cigarette lighters, the regulatory alternatives discussed in this notice, other possible ways to address these risks, and the economic impacts of the various regulatory alternatives. The Commission also invites interested persons to submit an existing standard, or a statement of intent to modify or develop a voluntary standard, to address the risk of injury described in this notice.
Written comments and submissions in response to this notice must be received by June 10, 2005.
Comments should be e-mailed to firstname.lastname@example.org. Comments should be captioned “ANPR for Cigarette Lighters.” Comments may also be mailed, preferably in five copies, to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207-0001, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland; telephone (301) 504-0800. Comments also may be filed by telefacsimile to (301) 504-0127.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rohit Khanna, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Start Printed Page 18340Washington, DC 20207; telephone (301) 504-7546 or e-mail: email@example.com.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
In November 2001, the Commission received a petition from the Lighter Association, Inc., Petition CP 02-1, asking that the Commission issue a rule to make the voluntary standard “Standard Consumer Product Safety Specification for Lighters” (ASTM F-400) a mandatory consumer product safety standard under the Consumer Product Safety Act (“CPSA”). The petitioner is a trade association representing the major U.S. manufacturers and distributors of cigarette lighters. The petitioner asserted that unreasonable risks of injury are being created because imported lighters are not complying with the voluntary standard.
The Commission published a notice in the Federal Register on January 17, 2002, requesting comments on the petition. 67 FR 2420. The Commission received a total of 16 comments on the petition. The Commission staff reviewed the petition, the comments, and available information and prepared a briefing package for the Commission (available at http://www.cpsc.gov). On September 14, 2004, the Commission held a public meeting at which the staff briefed the Commission, and the Commission invited the public to present comments on the petition. David H. Baker presented testimony on behalf of the petitioner, and Robert Polk presented testimony on behalf of the National Association of State Fire Marshals. Both presenters supported granting the petition. On November 30, 2004, the Commission voted 2-0 to grant the petition.
B. The Product
Cigarette lighters are flame producing products commonly used to light cigarettes, cigars and pipes. The Commission's Directorate for Economic Analysis estimates that total annual sales of lighters are about 900 million units. According to U.S. Census Bureau data, in 2003, up to 776 million lighters were imported into the U.S. China accounted for 55 percent of the lighter imports to the U.S. (420 million units) in 2003.
C. The Risk of Injury
The staff reviewed available incident data involving malfunctions of cigarette lighters. The staff searched the following five databases for data: the National Fire Incident Reporting System (“NFIRS”), the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (“NEISS”), the Death Certificates file (“DTHS”), the Injury or Potential Injury Incident file (“IPII”) and the In-Depth Investigation file (“INDP”).
U.S. fire departments attended an estimated 330 residential structure fires caused by cigarette lighter malfunctions from 1994 to 1999. These fires resulted in an estimated 90 injuries, 10 deaths, and $2.8 million in property damage.
NEISS is a statistical sampling of U.S. hospital emergency rooms that is designed to capture injuries associated with consumer products, while NFIRS is a voluntary fire department system that tracks fire incidents in the U.S. Because injuries related to cigarette lighter mechanical malfunctions are often not associated with a fire reportable to NFIRS, the NEISS provides a better estimate of these injuries than does NFIRS.
The most recent available NEISS data, 1997-2002, shows that during that six year period, an estimated 3,015 individuals were treated in hospital emergency departments for injuries resulting from malfunctioning cigarette lighters. Ninety-six percent of these individuals were treated and released. The majority (about 82 percent) of the injuries were thermal burns. The face, hand, or fingers accounted for 80 percent of the injured body parts.
Death Certificates File
For the period January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2002, one death was identified from the DTHS file that may have involved a cigarette lighter malfunction. On March 10, 2001, a 76 year-old woman died from 3rd degree burns over 90% of her body. The report from the county sheriff's office concluded that the victim either accidentally ignited her clothing with the lighter while smoking or the lighter sprayed fuel on her while she was lighting her cigarette.
IPII and INDP Files
A total of 256 incidents related to cigarette lighter malfunctions were identified from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2002 from sources including newspaper clippings, consumer complaints, medical examiners' reports, and CPSC in-depth investigations. Although not a statistical sample of all incidents that occurred during this time period, these reports provide useful details about the incidents.
In 153 of these 256 incidents, there were no injuries. The remaining 103 incidents resulted in injuries to 107 individuals. Three of these individuals died, six were hospitalized with serious injuries, and the majority (88) were treated and released. The condition of the remaining individuals was not reported. The deaths reported here were in addition to the deaths estimated through the NFIRS system. Where age was reported, almost 66 percent of the individuals were 15 through 64 years of age. There were no injuries to children under 5 years old reported.
The most frequent type of malfunction identified in the incidents was explosion due to pressure or volumetric displacement. Malfunctions due to pressure or volumetric displacement led to all three deaths reported in the IPII and INDP incidents. Some other failures that resulted in serious injury included fuel leakage resulting in ignition and flaring of the lighter.
D. Relevant Statutory Provisions
The petition was docketed under the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq. Section 7 of the CPSA authorizes the Commission to issue consumer product safety standards that consist of performance requirements and/or requirements for warnings or instructions. Id. 2056(a). The CPSA also states that any requirement of a consumer product safety standard must be “reasonably necessary to prevent or reduce an unreasonable risk of injury associated with such product.” Id.
Section 9 of the CPSA specifies the procedure the Commission follows to issue a consumer product safety standard. The Commission commences the rulemaking by issuing an ANPR which must identify the product and the risk of injury, summarize regulatory alternatives, and invite comments or suggested standards from the public. Id. 2058(a). After considering any comments submitted in response to the ANPR, the Commission will decide whether to issue a proposed rule and a preliminary regulatory analysis in accordance with section 9(c) of the CPSA. If a proposed rule is issued, the Commission would then consider the comments received in response to the proposed rule in deciding whether to issue a final rule and a final regulatory analysis. 15 U.S.C. 2058(f).
To issue a final rule, the Commission must find that the rule is “reasonably necessary to eliminate or reduce an unreasonable risk of injury associated Start Printed Page 18341with such product” and that issuing the rule is in the public interest. Id. 2058(f)(3)(A)&(B). In addition, if a voluntary standard addressing the risk of injury has been adopted and implemented, the Commission must find that (1) the voluntary standard is not likely to eliminate or adequately reduce the risk of injury, or that (2) substantial compliance with the voluntary standard is unlikely. Id. 2058(f)(3)(D). The Commission also must find that expected benefits of the rule bear a reasonable relationship to its costs and that the rule imposes the least burdensome requirements that would adequately reduce the risk of injury. Id. 2058(f)(3)(E)&(F).
E. Regulatory Alternatives
One or more of the following alternatives could be used to reduce the identified risks associated with mechanical malfunctions of cigarette lighters.
1. Mandatory standard. The Commission could issue a rule specifying certain performance requirements that cigarette lighters must meet. These requirements could be based on the requirements in ASTMF-400.
2. Mandatory labeling rule. The Commission could issue a rule requiring specified warnings or instructions for cigarette lighters.
3. Voluntary standard. If the Commission determined that ASTM F-400 is adequate to address the risk of injury associated with the product and that substantial compliance with it is likely, the Commission could defer to the voluntary standard in lieu of issuing a mandatory rule.
4. Reliance on recalls. Another alternative is for the Commission to take no regulatory action, but to pursue corrective actions of cigarette lighters on a case-by-case basis using its authority under section 15 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064.
F. Existing Standards
The Commission currently has a mandatory standard that applies to disposable and novelty cigarette lighters. 16 CFR part 1210. The standard prescribes requirements to make these lighters resistant to children younger than 5 years old.
The Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Lighters (ASTM F-400) was published in 1975. This is a voluntary standard. The standard establishes general safety requirements for all lighters. ASTM F-400 includes requirements for a maximum flame height, proper flame extinction, maintaining structural integrity when the lighter is exposed to hot or cold temperatures, maintaining structural integrity after a “drop” test, and requirements for internal pressure and fuel levels. ASTM F-400 also includes safety labeling requirements and instructions for proper use. Hazards associated with explosions are addressed by requirements for pressure/volumetric displacement, flame control, and fuel leakage.
There are international standards for lighters with requirements similar to those in ASTM F-400. The International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”) has published ISO 9994 Lighters, Safety Specifications, which has been adopted in many European countries. Compliance with ISO 9994 is also mandatory in Australia and New Zealand. Canada has requirements that are substantially the same as ASTM F-400 (Hazardous Products Regulations, SOR/89-514, P.C. 1989-2151, amended by SOR/91-251, P.C. 1995-827). Mexico does as well (NOM-090-SCFI-1994). A mandatory safety standard with requirements based on ASTM F-400 could further the goal of harmonizing U.S. and international rules.
The petitioner asserted that, due to the voluntary nature of ASTM F-400, many imported cigarette lighters do not conform to its requirements. The Commission has received some information from the petitioner and others in the industry concerning the level of compliance with the voluntary standard. Based on these submissions alone, the CPSC staff estimated in its briefing package that at least 75 percent (665 million units) of lighters in the U.S. market are purported to conform to the requirements of ASTM F-400. At the September 14, 2004 public meeting, the petitioner asserted that the compliance level may be substantially less than that level. The Commission staff has not yet conducted its own study of the level of compliance with the ASTM standard. The staff intends to conduct such a study in order to obtain an accurate estimate of the level of compliance.
G. Public Comments on the Petition
The Commission published a Federal Register notice asking for comments on the petition on January 17, 2002. 67 FR 2420. The Commission received a total of 16 comments on the petition. These are available from the Commission's Office of the Secretary.
Fourteen comments supported the petition, one comment was neutral, and one comment opposed the petition. Many commenters reiterated the petitioner's statements that the ASTM standard has the force and effect of law in Canada and Mexico, and that failure to enforce the ASTM standard in the U.S. is creating an unreasonable risk of injury. Letters supporting the petition came from companies that distribute, import, and/or export cigarette lighters. One comment from several importers of Chinese lighters opposed the petition, stating that a mandatory safety standard is unnecessary.
H. Request for Information and Comments
This ANPR is the first step of a proceeding that could result in a mandatory rule for cigarette lighters to address mechanical malfunction of lighters. All interested persons are invited to submit to the Commission their comments on any aspect of the alternatives discussed above. In accordance with section 9(a) of the CPSA, the Commission solicits:
1. Written comments with respect to the risk of injury identified by the Commission, the regulatory alternatives being considered, and other possible alternatives for addressing the risk.
2. Any existing standard or portion of a standard which could be issued as a proposed regulation.
3. A statement of intention to modify or develop a voluntary standard to address the risk of injury discussed in this notice, along with a description of a plan (including a schedule) to do so.
In addition, the Commission is interested in receiving information or test data concerning cigarette lighters' conformance to the requirements of ASTM F-400 (or similar safety standards).
Comments should be e-mailed to firstname.lastname@example.org. and should be captioned “ANPR for cigarette lighters.” Comments may also be mailed, preferably in five copies, to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207-0001, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone (301) 504-0800. Comments also may be filed by telefacsimile to (301) 504-0127. All comments and submissions should be received no later than June 10, 2005.Start Signature
Dated: April 4, 2005.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
List of Relevant Documents
1. Briefing memorandum from Jacqueline Elder, CPSC, Assistant Executive Director, Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction and Rohit Khanna, Project Manager, Directorate for Start Printed Page 18342Engineering Sciences, to the Commission, May 27, 2004.
2. Petition CP 02-1 from the Lighter Association, Inc. to Adopt ASTM F-400 as a Consumer Product Safety Standard, November 27, 2001.
3. Memorandum from Charles L. Smith, CPSC, Directorate for Economic Analysis, “Lighter Petition (Petition CP 02-1): Economic Considerations,” March 10, 2004.
4. Memorandum from Joe Vogel, CPSC, Office of Compliance, “Petition to Adopt ASTM F-400 for Cigarette Lighters as a Consumer Product Safety Standard under the Consumer Product Safety Act,” February 26, 2004.
5. Memorandum from Risana Chowdhury, CPSC, Division of Hazard Analysis, “Hazards Associated with Cigarette Lighter Malfunctions,” January 13, 2004.End Supplemental Information
[FR Doc. 05-7106 Filed 4-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P