This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Notice of final results of sixth antidumping duty new shipper review and final results and partial rescission of the fourth antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the final results in the administrative review and new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Notice of preliminary results of sixth new shipper review and preliminary results and partial rescission of fourth antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of final results and partial rescission of the new shipper review and final results and partial rescission of the third antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of preliminary results and partial rescission of fourth new shipper review and preliminary results of third antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the final results in the new shipper review and administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the preliminary results in the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
31
as of
09/09/2026 at 12:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
On October 17, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the “Department”) published the notice of amended final results of the antidumping duty administrative review: certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China (“PRC”), covering the period of review (POR) February 1, 2003, through January 31, 2004.
See Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 60280 (October 17, 2005) (“
Amended Final Results
”).[1]
We are amending the final results of certain preserved mushrooms from the PRC to correct ministerial errors made in the calculations of the dumping margins for China Processed Food Import & Export Company and its affiliates (collectively, “COFCO”) pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
See Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 54361 (September 14, 2005) (“Final Results”).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
December 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Pierce or Christopher Riker, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0961 or (202) 482-3441, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of Order
The products covered by this order are certain preserved mushrooms, whether imported whole, sliced, diced, or as stems and pieces. The certain preserved mushrooms covered under this order are the species
Agaricus bisporus and Agaricus bitorquis. “Certain Preserved Mushrooms” refer to mushrooms that have been prepared or preserved by cleaning, blanching, and sometimes slicing or cutting. These mushrooms are then packed and heated in containers including, but not limited to, cans or glass jars in a suitable liquid medium, including, but not limited to, water, brine, butter or butter sauce. Certain preserved mushrooms may be imported whole, sliced, diced, or as stems and pieces. Included within the scope of this order are “brined” mushrooms, which are presalted and packed in a heavy salt solution to provisionally preserve them for further processing.
Excluded from the scope of this order are the following: (1) All other species of mushroom, including straw mushrooms; (2) all fresh and chilled mushrooms, including “refrigerated” or “quick blanched mushrooms”; (3) dried mushrooms; (4) frozen mushrooms; and (5) “marinated,” “acidified,” or “pickled” mushrooms, which are prepared or preserved by means of vinegar or acetic acid, but may contain oil or other additives.[2]
The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under subheadings: 2003.10.0127, 2003.10.0131, 2003.10.0137, 2003.10.0143, 2003.10.0147, 2003.10.0153 and 0711.51.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.
Background
On September 14, 2005, the Department published the final results of this administrative review in the
Federal Register
.
See Final Results.
After analyzing all interested parties' comments, we have determined, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e), that ministerial errors existed in the calculations for the
Final Results, with respect to COFCO. A ministerial error is defined in Section 751(h) of the Act and further clarified in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as “an error in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.” For a detailed discussion of these ministerial errors, as well as the Department's analysis,
see
memorandum from Christopher D. Riker to James C. Doyle,
Analysis of COFCO Ministerial Error Allegations, dated December 21, 2005, on file in the Central Records Unit, room B-099 in the main Department building.
Therefore, in accordance with Section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are amending the
Final Results
of the administrative review of certain preserved mushrooms from the PRC for COFCO. The revised weighted-average dumping margin is detailed in the chart below. For the company-specific calculation
see
memorandum from
( printed page 76773)
Christopher D. Riker to the File,
Analysis for the Second Amended Final Results of Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China: COFCO, dated December 21, 2005.
Exporter
Percent
COFCO
2.67
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries based on the amended final results. For details on the assessment of antidumping duties on all appropriate entries,
see Final Results.
These amended final results are published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(I)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 21, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Footnotes
1.
The Department did not address comments pertaining to clerical error allegations relating to COFCO's margin in the
Amended Final Results
because the U.S. Court of International Trade had obtained jurisdiction of those results pursuant to COFCO's complaint.
See China Processed Food Import & Export Company v. United States, Court No. 05-00515 (Complaint filed September 19, 2005);
see also,
Zenith Elecs. Corp. v. United States, 884 F.2d 556, 561 (Fed. Cir. 1989). However, on December 14, 2005, the Court granted leave to the Department to make the necessary corrections to COFCO's margin.
See China Processed Food Import & Export Company v. United States, Court No. 05-00515 (Order issued December 14, 2005).
2.
On June 19, 2000, the Department affirmed that “marinated,” “acidified,” or “pickled” mushrooms containing less than 0.5 percent acetic acid are within the scope of the antidumping duty order.
See
“Recommendation Memorandum-Final Ruling of Request by Tak Fat,
et al.
for Exclusion of Certain Marinated, Acidified Mushrooms from the Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China,” dated June 19, 2000. On February 9, 2005, this decision was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
See Tak Fat v. United States, 396 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2005).