Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Fax written comments on the collection of information by May 10, 2006.
OMB is still experiencing significant delays in the regular mail, including first class and express mail, and messenger deliveries are not being accepted. To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota, Desk Officer for FDA, FAX: 202-395-6974.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance.
Guidance for Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006—(OMB Control Number 0910-0571)—Extension
FDA issued a final rule (the trans fat final rule) on July 11, 2003, (68 FR 41434) to require food labels to bear the gram (g) amount of trans fat without a percent Daily Value (% DV) directly under the saturated fat line on the Nutrition Facts panel (http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~acrobat/fr03711a.pdf). The trans fat final rule affects almost all manufacturers of packaged, labeled food sold in the United States. FDA believes that most businesses, including small Start Printed Page 18106businesses, should not have difficulty meeting the January 1, 2006, effective date of the trans fat final rule. However, under certain circumstances some businesses may want to request that the agency consider an extension of time to use current labels that are not in compliance with the trans fat final rule. The agency believes that it would be appropriate to consider, on a case-by-case basis, whether to exercise enforcement discretion on the January 1, 2006, effective date for trans fat labeling for some businesses that can make an appropriate showing. Thus, in the Federal Register of December 14, 2005 (70 FR 74020), FDA announced the availability of a guidance document for industry and FDA entitled “Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006.” That document provides guidance to FDA and the food industry about when and how businesses may request the agency to consider enforcement discretion for the use of some or all existing label stock, that does not declare trans fat labeling in compliance with the final rule, on products introduced into interstate commerce on or after the January 1, 2006, effective date.
The agency intends to consider the following factors in any request from a firm for the agency's exercise of enforcement discretion:
- Whether products contain 0.5 g or less trans fat;
- The explanation of why the request is being made;
- The number of existing labels that the firm is requesting to use;
- The dollar amount associated with the number of existing labels to be used; and
- The estimate of the amount of time needed, not exceeding 12 months, to exhaust the number of existing labels the firm is requesting to use.
Firms may submit their requests in writing to FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Firms are encouraged to keep this letter of request for their records and should make a copy available for inspection to any FDA officer or employee who requests it. FDA intends to use the information in the letter to make decisions about whether a firm's product is subject to FDA's enforcement discretion for the trans fat labeling requirements. FDA expects that small businesses and very small businesses are the firms most likely to take advantage of this opportunity to submit a request for an extension to the trans fat labeling deadline. FDA estimates a 2-year time period during which these requests will be made following the issuance of this guidance. Beyond 2 years time, FDA expects businesses to fully comply with the trans fat labeling final rule, as it is unlikely that there will still be old labeling stock remaining.
In previous Federal Register notices regarding this collection of information (70 FR 52108 and 70 FR 70621), the estimated number of requests was lower than the actual number of requests received by the agency in response to the guidance. Thus, we have increased the estimated number of requests based on FDA's recent experience. In the Federal Register of November 22, 2005 (70 FR 70621), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the information collection provisions. We received four comments; however, none were related to the information collection.
FDA estimates that it will take one employee approximately 4 hours to put together a request to FDA and approximately 1 hour for a supervisor to look over the request before submitting it to the agency. Thus, each firm submitting a compliance extension request will need 5 hours of employee time to complete the request. Given that 600 businesses are expected to submit written requests in year one, the total burden hours for year one is 3,000 hours.
In year two, FDA expects about one-half as many businesses to request a labeling compliance extension. So, for year two, 300 businesses are expected to file a request for an extension to the labeling compliance date. Again, assuming that it will take 5 hours to complete each request, the total burden hours for year two will be 1,500 hours.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows:
|Activity||No. of Respondents||Annual Frequency per Response||Total Annual Responses||Hours per Response||Total Hours|
|Written requests to FDA in year one||600||1||600||5||3,000|
|Written requests to FDA in year two||300||1||300||5||1,500|
|One time burden hours for years one and two||4,500|
|1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.|
Dated: April 3, 2006.
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E6-5199 Filed 4-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S