Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry: Evidence-Based Review System for the Scientific Evaluation of Health Claims.” This draft guidance updates the agency's approach to the review of the publicly available scientific evidence for significant scientific agreement (SSA) and qualified health claims. FDA is taking this action to inform interested persons of the system it intends to use to review the scientific evidence in the evaluation of SSA and qualified health claims.
Submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance document by September 7, 2007.
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to the Office of Nutritional Products, Labeling and Dietary Supplements (HFS-800), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740. Send one-self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in processing your request, or include a fax number to which the draft guidance may be sent. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance.
Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://www/fda/gov/dockets/ecomments.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula Trumbo, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-830), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 310-436-2579.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry: Evidence-Based Review System for the Scientific Evaluation of Health Claims.” The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA) was designed to give consumers more scientifically valid information about foods they eat. Among other provisions, NLEA directed FDA to issue regulations providing for the use of statements that describe the relationship between a substance and a disease (“health claims”) in the labeling of foods, including dietary supplements, after such statements have been reviewed and authorized by FDA. For these health claims, that is, statements about substance/disease relationships, FDA has defined the term “substance” by regulation as a specific food or food component (§ 101.14(a)(2) (21 CFR 101.14(a)(2)). An authorized health claim may be used on both conventional foods and dietary supplements, assuming that the substance in the product and the product itself meet the appropriate standards in the authorizing regulation. Health claims are directed to the general population or designated subgroups (e.g., the elderly) and are intended to assist the consumer in maintaining healthful dietary practices.
In evaluating a petition for an SSA health claim submitted under § 101.70 (21 CFR 101.70), FDA considers whether the evidence supporting the relationship that is the subject of the claim meets the SSA standard. This standard derives from section 403(r)(3)(B)(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(3)(B)(i)), which provides that FDA shall authorize a health claim to be used on conventional foods if the agency “determines, based on the totality of the publicly available scientific evidence (including evidence from well-designed studies conducted in a manner which is consistent with generally recognized scientific procedures and principles), that there is significant scientific agreement, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate such claims, that the claim is supported by such evidence.” This scientific standard was prescribed by statute for conventional food health claims; by regulation, FDA adopted the same standard for dietary supplements health claims (see § 101.14(c)).
The genesis of qualified health claims was the court of appeals decision in Pearson v. Shalala (Pearson). In that case, the plaintiffs challenged FDA's decision not to authorize health claims for four specific substance/disease relationships for dietary supplements. Although the district court ruled for FDA (14 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 1998)), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit reversed the lower court's decision (164 F.3d 650 (DC Cir. 1999)). The appeals court held that the First Amendment does not permit FDA to reject health claims that the agency determines to be potentially misleading unless the agency also reasonably determines that a disclaimer would not eliminate the potential deception. The appeals court also held that the Administrative Procedure Act required FDA to clarify the SSA standard for authorizing health claims.
On December 22, 1999, FDA announced the issuance of a guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry: Significant Scientific Agreement in the Review of Health Claims for Conventional Foods and Dietary Supplements” (64 FR 71794). This guidance document was issued to clarify FDA's interpretation of the SSA standard in response to the court of appeals second holding in Pearson.Start Printed Page 37247
On December 20, 2002, the agency announced its intention to extend Pearson to health claims for conventional foods (67 FR 78002). Recognizing the need for an approach for scientific evaluations for qualified health claims, the task force on “Consumer Health Information for Better Nutrition” was formed. As part of the task force's final report,1 FDA developed an interim evidence-based review system that the agency intended to use to evaluate the substance/disease relationships that are subjects of qualified health claims.
In reviewing both the December 22, 1999, guidance document and the 2003 task force report, it became apparent to the agency that the components of the scientific review process for an SSA health claim and qualified health claim are very similar. Because of the similarity between the scientific reviews for SSA and qualified health claims, FDA intends to generally use the approach set out in this draft guidance for evaluating the scientific evidence in petitions that are submitted for an SSA health claim or qualified health claim.
The primary purpose of this document is to set out FDA's current thinking on the process for evaluating the scientific evidence for a health claim, the meaning of the SSA standard in section 403(r)(3) of the act and § 101.14(c), and credible scientific evidence to support a qualified health claim.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance practice regulations (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on the scientific review process for SSA and qualified health claims. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in §§ 101.14 and 101.70 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0381.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding the draft guidance document. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. The draft guidance and received comments are available for public examination in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance at http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/guidance.html.Start Signature
Dated: June 28, 2007.
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7-13274 Filed 7-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S