This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Final rule.
This final rule revises HUD's regulations to reflect the statutorily mandated termination of the HUD Board of Contract Appeals. As required by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (2006 NDA Act), the contract-related functions of the HUD Board of Contract Appeals have been transferred to the new Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. This final rule also describes the organization, address, and officer qualifications of the new Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) and its two divisions, which will carry out the nonprocurement functions performed by the former HUD Board of Contract Appeals. This rule also makes conforming changes to other HUD regulations to reflect this organizational change. Additionally, this rule makes a technical correction to HUD's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regulations to include reference to Regional Counsel, which was inadvertently omitted from a previously published rule.
Effective Date: October 22, 2007.
Questions regarding the establishment and organization of the OHA should be directed to David T. Anderson, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1707 H Street, NW., Eleventh Floor, Washington, DC 20006; telephone number (202) 254-0000 (this is not a toll-free number). Questions regarding the technical correction to the part 15 regulations should be directed to Allen Villafuerte, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10258, Washington, DC 20410-0500; telephone number (202) 708-0300, extension 5095 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing-or speech-impaired individuals may access these telephone numbers via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
Section 847 of the 2006 NDA Act (Pub. L. 109-163, approved January 6, 2006) (41 U.S.C. 438) established the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals within the General Services Administration and gave it jurisdiction to decide contract disputes from several civilian agencies. The 2006 NDA Act simultaneously terminated the Boards of Contract Appeals of eight federal agencies, excepting the boards of contract appeals of the Department of Defense, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the U.S. Postal Service. As a result, the affected eight federal agencies, including HUD, no longer have a board of contract appeals as part of their organizational structure.
Because of the transfer of contract appeals adjudicatory responsibilities under the 2006 NDA Act, and to provide the nonprocurement contract dispute functions performed by the former HUD Board of Contract Appeals, HUD has established within the Office of the Secretary a new OHA (71 FR 76679, December 21, 2006). The OHA consists of two separate divisions, the existing Office of Administrative Law Judges and the new Office of Appeals. The Office of Appeals includes Administrative Judges who perform certain nonprocurement contract appeals functions that were provided by the Administrative Judges of the former HUD Board of Contract Appeals.
This final rule revises the regulations in 24 CFR part 20, which governed the establishment and operation of the former HUD Board of Contract Appeals. Specifically, this rule describes the OHA's organization, address, and officer qualifications. This rule also makes conforming changes to regulations in parts 14, 17, 20, 24, 25, 26, and 180 that reference the former HUD Board of Contract Appeals. It also reflects the new address of the Office of Administrative Law Judges throughout HUD's regulations.
In addition, this rule makes a technical amendment to HUD's FOIA regulations in 24 CFR part 15. HUD published a final rule on February 26, 2007 (72 FR 8580) to clarify the types of requests for HUD documents and employee testimony covered by the Department's document production and testimony approval regulations. In HUD's amendments to § 15.203 in the February 26, 2007, final rule, HUD inadvertently omitted reference to Regional Counsel in § 15.203(b). Section 15.203(b) in the February 26, 2007, final rule largely mirrors § 15.203(a) of the part 15 regulations codified in the 2006 edition of title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Section 15.203(a) of the 2006 codified regulations references Regional Counsel, and HUD intended to include the same reference in the new § 15.203(b) of the February 26, 2007, final rule. This rule provides for such inclusion.
In general, HUD publishes a rule for public comment before issuing a rule for effect, in accordance with HUD's regulations on rulemaking at 24 CFR part 10. Part 10, however, allows in § 10.1 for omission of notice and public comment in cases of statements of policy, interpretive rules, rules governing the Department's organization or internal practices, or if a statute expressly provides for omission of notice and public comment. In this case, public comment is unnecessary because the majority of this rule reflects the Department's organization resulting from the termination of the HUD Board of Contract Appeals, pursuant to the 2006 NDA Act. More specifically, this final rule removes regulations relating to the former HUD Board of Contract Appeals and describes the organization of the new OHA. It also reflects the reassignment of nonprocurement functions previously carried out by the former HUD Board of Contract Appeals elsewhere within the Department. Similarly, the correction to part 15 merely outlines the procedures used by the Department to be followed when a subpoena, order, or other demand of a court is issued to HUD for the disclosure of material or for the disclosure of information in its possession. This correction reflects current HUD practices. The amendment made by this part of this rule does not affect the rights or obligations of members of the public.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final rule does not establish special procedures that would need to be complied with by small entities. This rule does not change the procedures that all entities, small and large, must follow in the course of certain hearings and appellate review processes. Accordingly, the undersigned certifies that this final rule would not ( printed page 53877) have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule does not direct, provide for assistance or loan and mortgage insurance for, or otherwise govern or regulate, real property acquisition, disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, alteration, demolition, or new construction, nor does it establish, revise, or provide for standards for construction or construction materials, manufactured housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this proposed rule is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Executive Order 13132 (entitled “Federalism”) prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has federalism implications, if the rule either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order. This final rule does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments nor preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This final rule does not impose any federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal governments or the private sector within the meaning of UMRA.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, HUD amends 24 CFR parts 14, 15, 17, 20, 24, 25, 26, and 180, as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 14 is revised to read as follows:
2. In 24 CFR 14.50, in the definition of Adjudicative officer, remove the words “Board of Contract Appeals” and add, in their place, the words “Office of Appeals”.
3. The authority citation for part 15 continues to read as follows:
4. Revise paragraph (b) of § 15.203 to read as follows:
(b) Whenever a demand is made upon the Department or an employee of the Department for the production of material or provision of testimony, the employee shall immediately notify the Associate General Counsel for Litigation, or the appropriate Regional Counsel, or other designee. The appropriate Regional Counsel shall mean the Regional Counsel for the Regional Office having delegated authority over the project or activity with respect to which the information is sought. The Associate General Counsel for Litigation, the appropriate Regional Counsel, or other designee shall maintain a record of all demands served upon the Department and refer the demand to the appropriate designee for processing and determination.
5. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
6. The authority citation for subpart C continues to read as follows:
7. Revise § 17.140 to read as follows:
The employee shall file an original and one copy of a request for a hearing with the Clerk, Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 1707 H Street, NW., Eleventh Floor, Washington, DC 20006, on official work days between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 5:15 p.m. All other correspondence shall be submitted to the Department Claims Officer, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410. Documents may be filed by personal delivery or mail. All documents shall be printed, typewritten, or otherwise processed in clear, legible form and on letter-size paper.
8. Revise § 17.152 to read as follows:
(a) Notification by debtor. A debtor who receives a Notice of Intent has the right to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past-due or not legally enforceable. The debtor should send a copy of the Notice of Intent with a letter notifying the Office of Appeals within 25 calendar days from the date of the Department's Notice of Intent that he or she intends to present evidence. (See ( printed page 53878) § 17.161(a) for address of the Office of Appeals.) Failure to give this advance notice will not jeopardize the debtor's right to present evidence within the 65 days provided for in paragraph (b) of this section. If the Office of Appeals has additional procedures governing the review process, a copy of the procedures will be mailed to the debtor after his request for review is received and docketed by the Office of Appeals.
(b) Submission of evidence. The debtor may submit evidence showing that all or part of the debt is not past-due or not legally enforceable, along with the notification requested by paragraph (a) of this section, but in any event the evidence must be submitted to the Office of Appeals within 65 calendar days from the date of the Department's Notice of Intent. Failure to submit evidence within 65 calendar days will result in a dismissal of the request for review by the Office of Appeals.
(c) Review of the record. After a timely submission of evidence by the debtor, an Administrative Judge from the Office of Appeals will review the evidence submitted by the Department that shows that all or part of the debt is past-due and legally enforceable. (Administrative Judges are appointed in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 607(b)(1).) The Administrative Judge shall make a determination based upon a review of the written record, except that the Administrative Judge may order an oral hearing if he or she finds that:
(1) An applicable statute authorizes or requires the Secretary to consider waiver of the indebtedness and the waiver determination turns on credibility or veracity; or
(2) The question of indebtedness cannot be resolved by review of the documentary evidence.
(d) Previous decision by the Office of Appeals. The debtor is not entitled to a review of the Department's intent to offset it if, in a previous year, the Office of Appeals has issued a decision on the merits that the debt is past-due and legally enforceable, except when the debt has become legally unenforceable since the issuance of that decision or when the debtor can submit newly discovered material evidence that the debt is presently not legally enforceable.
9. Revise § 17.161(a) to read as follows:
(a) All correspondence from the debtor to the Office of Appeals concerning the right to review as described in § 17.152 shall be addressed to the HUD Office of Appeals, 1707 H Street, NW, Eleventh Floor, Washington, DC 20006.
10. Revise § 17.170(b) to read as follows:
(b) Hearing official. Any hearing required to establish the Secretary's right to collect a debt through administrative wage garnishment shall be conducted by an Administrative Judge of the Office of Appeals.
11. Revise part 20 to read as follows:
There is established in the Office of the Secretary the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
(a) Location. The Office of Hearings and Appeals is located at 1707 H Street, NW, Eleventh Floor, Washington, DC 20006. The telephone number of the Office of Hearings and Appeals is (202) 254-0000. Hearing- or speech-impaired individuals may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. The facsimile number is (202) 254-0011.
(b) Organization. The Office of Hearings and Appeals consists of two divisions: the Office of Administrative Law Judges and the Office of Appeals. Its administrative activities are supervised by the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
(c) Officer qualifications. The Director, Administrative Judges, and Administrative Law Judges of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall be attorneys at law duly licensed by any state, commonwealth, territory, or the District of Columbia.
The Office of Appeals shall, consistent with statute and regulation, have jurisdiction over matters assigned to it by the Secretary or designee. Determinations shall have the finality provided by the applicable statute, regulation, or agreement.
12. The authority citation for part 24 continues to read as follows:
13. In 24 CFR 24.947, remove the words “Board of Contract Appeals” and add, in their place, the words “Office of Appeals”.
14. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 25 continues to read as follows:
15. In § 25.3, revise the definition of Hearing officer to read as follows:
Hearing officer. An Administrative Law Judge authorized by the Secretary, or by the Secretary's designee, to issue findings of fact or other appropriate findings under § 25.8(d)(2).
16. The authority citation for part 26 continues to read as follows:
17. In 24 CFR 26.2(a), remove the words “Board of Contract Appeals” and add, in their place, the words “Office of Appeals”.
18. In § 26.28, revise the definition of Chief Docket Clerk to read as follows:
Chief Docket Clerk means the Chief Docket Clerk of the Office of Administrative Law Judges at the following address: 1707 H Street, NW., Eleventh Floor, Washington, DC 20006.
19. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
( printed page 53879)20. In § 180.100(c), revise the definition of Chief Docket Clerk to read as follows:
(c) * * *
Chief Docket Clerk is the docket clerk for HUD's Office of Administrative Law Judges, 1707 H Street, NW., Eleventh Floor, Washington, DC 20006. The telephone number is (202) 254-0000 and the facsimile number is (202) 254-0011.
Dated: August 13, 2007.
Roy A. Bernardi,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-18522 Filed 9-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P