Office of the Secretary, DHS.
Interim rule with request for comments.
This interim rule amends Department of Homeland Security regulations, to consolidate the procedures for administrative seizure and forfeiture process. The interim rule also permits earlier consideration of petitions for the remission of seized assets in cases that would otherwise be brought under the procedures in title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The interim rule also makes technical and conforming changes to update the regulations.
This interim rule is effective February 19, 2008. Written comments must be submitted on or before April 21, 2008.
You may submit comments, identified by docket number, by one of the following methods:
- Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments via docket number USCBP-2006-0122.
- Mail: Border Security Regulations Branch, Office of Regulations and Rulings, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and document number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments may also be inspected on regular business days between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Office of Regulations and Rulings, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC. Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by calling Mr. Joseph Clark, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, at (202) 572-8768.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeremy Baskin, Office of Regulations and Rulings, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (202) 572-8700.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the interim rule. DHS also invites comments that relate to the economic, environmental, or federalism effects that might result from this interim rule. Comments that will provide the most assistance to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in developing these procedures will reference a specific portion of the interim rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include data, information, and authority that support such recommended change.
On November 25, 2002, the President signed into law the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135 (HSA). Accordingly, as of March 1, 2003, the former Immigration and Nationalization Service (INS) of the Department of Justice and the former U.S. Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury were transferred to DHS and reorganized to become U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
After passage of the HSA, both CBP and ICE retained authority to perform asset seizures and forfeitures under the provisions of 8 CFR part 274 and 19 CFR parts 162 and 171. DHS, for the purpose of improved efficiency, has consolidated the processing of asset forfeitures into CBP's operations. The regulations in Titles 8 and 19, however, currently provide two different procedures. This interim rule consolidates the procedures for administrative seizure and forfeiture process by altering the text of 8 CFR 274.1 to refer to 19 CFR parts 162 and 171. This rule also makes technical conforming changes to update references from INS and U.S. Customs Service to CBP and ICE where applicable.
Interim Rule Changes
Pursuant to the provisions of section 618 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1618), petitions for remission of forfeitures were accepted by the former U.S. Customs Service, and now accepted by CBP, prior to initiation of any administrative or judicial forfeiture process. Under the regulations adopted under section 274(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1324(b) (INA)), the remission or mitigation of such forfeitures could occur only after completion of the forfeiture process. No statute, however, requires this restriction. Under this interim rule, the procedures previously used for immigration-related forfeitures will be eliminated and all asset forfeiture proceedings will be conducted under a consolidated procedure. This interim rule revises 8 CFR part 274 in its entirety to bring seizures and forfeitures effected under section 274(b) of the INA, as amended, and other forfeiture authorities, into conformity with procedures under 19 CFR parts 162 and 171. This change permits CBP to entertain petitions for remission and return of seized property prior to completing the forfeiture process, whether the seizure was effected under the customs laws or the immigration laws, and whether the seizure was made by CBP or ICE.
Accordingly, 8 CFR part 274 is amended to reference Title 19 administrative seizure and forfeiture processes. This is the only significant difference between the provisions and DHS through this interim rule adopts the procedure that provides greater flexibility and is more favorable to petitioners for remission.
The provisions of current 19 CFR 162.21 reference the former U.S. Customs Service and U.S. Customs Officers. The interim rule updates these references to reflect U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CBP Officers as applicable.
Currently, 19 CFR 162.22(d) references retention of vessels or vehicles pending penalty payment and specifically references section 460 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 Start Printed Page 9011U.S.C. 1460). Section 460 of the Tariff Act of 1930 was repealed by Public Law 99-570, title III, section 3115(b), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207-82. Accordingly, this interim rule removes 19 CFR 162.22(d) and redesignates paragraph (e) as paragraph (d).
This rule also updates certain delegations of authority to reflect the current organizational structures. Title 19 CFR 162.92(d)(1) currently empowers the Customs Assistant Commissioner, Investigations, or his designee, to extend the period for sending notices for any seizure under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000, Public Law 106-185, 114 Stat. 202, (CAFRA). Currently, the Assistant Commissioner, Investigations, is the official designated by CBP to grant time extensions for sending notices of seizure as authorized by 18 U.S.C. 983(a)(1)(B). 67 FR 9188 (Feb. 28, 2002). Inasmuch as a reorganization plan under the HSA moved the investigative functions previously performed by Customs agents to ICE, DHS is changing the regulation to reflect this change in authority. In addition, an official within CBP must retain the authority for certain seizures effected by CBP officers or Border Patrol agents. Accordingly, this interim rule amends 19 CFR 162.92(d)(1) to designate the Assistant Secretary of ICE, or his or her designee, and the Commissioner of CBP, or his or her designee, as the officials authorized to grant such an extension.
Administrative Procedure Act
This rule is procedural in nature and does not alter the substantive rights of the affected parties. Therefore, this rule is exempt from the notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A)). In addition, the delayed effective date requirement of 5 U.S.C. 553(d) does not apply to this rule. DHS, however, is interested in public comments on this rule and will consider all timely comments in the preparation of a final rule.
The interim rule may benefit entities whose property is seized under 8 CFR part 274. Under the interim regulations, entities whose property is seized under 8 CFR part 274 may take advantage of pre-forfeiture administrative processing and request return of their property prior to the conclusion of forfeiture processing. Prior to this interim rule, owners of property seized under 8 CFR part 274 were required to wait for their petitions to be acted upon until after forfeiture processing was complete. There will be no increased costs to either private companies or individuals as a result of this interim rule. The interim rule may also yield cost savings for the government if seized items can leave government storage areas more quickly under the earlier petitioning provision.
Executive Order 12866
This interim rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 603(b)), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), requires an agency to prepare and make available to the public a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of a proposed rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions) when the agency is required “to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking for any proposed rule.” Because this rule is being issued as an interim rule, on the grounds set forth above, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required under the RFA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
DHS has determined that the collection of information required by this interim rule falls under the “administrative exception” to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). The “administrative exception,” applies because any such collection is made during the conduct of administrative action taken by an agency against specific individuals or entities. 5 CFR 1320.4(a)(2).Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects
- Administrative practice and procedure
- Customs duties and inspection
- Law enforcement
- Prohibited merchandise
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- Seizures and forfeitures
Amendments to Title 8 of the Code of Federal RegulationsStart Amendment Part
For the reasons stated above,End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 274—SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF CONVEYANCESEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 274 is revised to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. Section 274.1 is revised to read as follows:End Amendment Part
Any officer of Customs and Border Protection or Immigration and Customs Enforcement may seize and forfeit any property that has been or is being used in the commission of a violation of any statutory authority involving the unlawful introduction of aliens, contraband or proceeds of such introduction, pursuant to, but not limited to, section 274(a) of the Act (8 U.S.C. 1324(a)). All seizures and forfeitures in such cases will be administered in accordance with 19 CFR parts 162 and 171.
3. Section 274.2 is revised to read as follows:End Amendment Part
All powers provided to Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures Officers in 19 CFR parts 162 and 171 are provided to the Chief, Office of Border Patrol or his designees, for purposes of administering seizures and forfeitures made by Border Patrol Officers.
4. Sections 274.3 through 274.20 are removed.End Amendment Part
Amendments to Title 19 of the Code of Federal RegulationsStart Amendment Part
For the reasons set forth above,End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 162—INSPECTION, SEARCH, AND SEIZUREEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The general authority citation for part 162 and specific authority citation for § 162.22 is revised, and the specific authority citations for §§ 162.21 and 162.91 through 162.96 continue to read as follows:End Amendment Part
Section 162.21 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 482, 1581, 1582, 1602;
Sections 162.91 through 162.96 also issued under 18 U.S.C. 983.
2. Section 162.21(a) is amended by removing the phrase “the Customs Service” and replacing it with theEnd Amendment Part
3. In section 162.22:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
a. The last sentence of paragraph (a) is amended by removing the period at the end of the last sentence and adding the phrase “and section 274(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
b. Paragraph (d) is removed and current paragraph (e) is redesignated as paragraph (d).End Amendment Part
4. The first sentence of section 162.91 is amended by removing the term “Customs” and replacing it with the term “Customs and Border Protection or Immigration and Customs Enforcement”.End Amendment Part
5. In section 162.92:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
a. The heading of paragraph (d) is amended by removing the phrase “by Customs”.End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
b. Paragraph (d)(1) is amended by removing the phrase “Assistant Commissioner, Investigations, or his designee” and replacing it with the term “Assistant Secretary, Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection for cases within their respective agencies, or their successors or designees”.End Amendment Part Start Signature
Date: January 28, 2008.
[FR Doc. E8-2965 Filed 2-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P