This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Self-Regulatory Organizations: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to the Codes of Arbitration Procedure To Permit Submissions to Arbitrators After a Case Has Closed Under Limited Circumstances
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Self-Regulatory Organizations: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to the Codes of Arbitration Procedure To Permit Submissions to Arbitrators After a Case Has Closed Under Limited Circumstances
Public Comments
Enhanced Content - Public Comments
This feature is not available for this document.
Regulations.gov Data
Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data
Additional information is not currently available for this document.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
4
as of
07/16/2026 at 12:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]
notice is hereby given that on February 7, 2008, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) (f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”)) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by FINRA. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing Rule 12905 of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes (“Customer Code”) and Rule 13905 of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes (“Industry Code”) to permit submissions to arbitrators after a case has closed only under the following circumstances: (1) As ordered by a court; (2) at the request of any party within 30 days of service of an award or notice that a matter has been closed, for ministerial matters; or (3) if all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days of service of an award or notice that a matter has been closed. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. All the text is new.
12905. Submissions After a Case Has Closed
(a) Parties may not submit documents to arbitrator(s) in cases that have been closed except under the following limited circumstances:
As ordered by a court;
At the request of any party within 30 days of service of an award or notice that a matter has been closed, for ministerial matters such as miscalculation of figures, mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award, or if the award is imperfect in a matter of form that does not affect the decision on the merits; or
If all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days of (1) service of an award or (2) notice that a matter has been closed.
(b) Parties must make requests under this rule in writing to the Director and must include the basis relied on under this rule for the request. The Director will forward the documents, along with any responses from other parties, to the arbitrators. Unless the arbitrators rule within 20 days after the Director forwards the documents to the arbitrators, the request shall be deemed denied.
13905. Submissions After a Case Has Closed
(a) Parties may not submit documents to arbitrator(s) in cases that have been closed except under the following limited circumstances:
As ordered by a court;
At the request of any party within 30 days of service of an award or notice that a matter has been closed, for
( printed page 15816)
ministerial matters such as miscalculation of figures, mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award, or if the award is imperfect in a matter of form that does not affect the decision on the merits; or
If all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days of (1) service of an award or (2) notice that a matter has been closed.
(b) Parties must make requests under this rule in writing to the Director and must include the basis relied on under this rule for the request. The Director will forward the documents, along with any responses from other parties, to the arbitrators. Unless the arbitrators rule within 20 days after the Director forwards the documents to the arbitrators, the request shall be deemed denied.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
FINRA is proposing to amend its Customer Code and Industry Code to adopt new rules to permit submissions to arbitrators after a case has closed only under limited circumstances. The proposed rule change would reduce attorneys' fees and other costs associated with responding to such submissions and would support the finality of arbitration awards issued in the forum.
FINRA staff receives several requests each year from parties to submit documents to arbitrators (the panel) in cases that have been closed for long periods of time. Parties file these requests for a number of reasons, such as to obtain expungement relief that a party failed to request during the life of the case, to correct what a party perceives to be a mistake in the award, or to request that forum fee allocations be changed.
Currently, the Customer and Industry Codes do not contain deadlines for such submissions and, indeed, do not address the matter. Therefore, staff forwards to panels the requests, along with any responses from other parties, regardless of the time that has elapsed since the case was closed. The panels rarely determine to reopen a matter.
A case is deemed closed on the date FINRA serves an award or sends to the parties a letter notifying them that a case is closed (for example, by settlement). The absence of deadlines in the Customer and Industry Codes for submissions in closed cases can cause numerous problems. For example, parties might submit documents to the panel years after cases have closed. Also, arbitrators might have resigned from the roster or died by the time such submissions are made. Finally, parties might incur substantial attorneys' fees and other costs in responding to closed-case submissions.
Potential legal issues are also present. Some states empower arbitrators to correct technical or mathematical errors in their awards, but only for a short period of time following the award's issuance, and courts may remand a matter to the original arbitrators when they vacate awards in whole or in part.[3]
Beyond these examples, however, the law generally provides that the arbitrators' authority ends when the arbitrators render their decisions.
To address the problems associated with submissions in closed cases, FINRA is proposing to permit submissions to arbitrators after a case has closed only under the following limited circumstances:
As ordered by a court;
At the request of any party within 30 days of service of an award or notice that a matter has been closed, for ministerial matters such as miscalculation of figures, mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award, or if the award is imperfect in a matter of form that does not affect the decision on the merits; or
If all parties agree and submit documents within 30 days of (1) service of an award or (2) notice that a matter has been closed.
The 30-day limit is in line with time limits allowed under many state laws [4]
and would ensure that a majority of the arbitrators that served on the panel will be available to review the submissions. Under the second alternative, request by only one party, FINRA would follow its normal procedure of soliciting a response from the other parties before forwarding the request to the panel.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,[5]
which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change would reduce the costs associated with responding to submissions in closed cases and support the finality of arbitration awards issued in the forum.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register
or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
( printed page 15817)
Send an e-mail torule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-FINRA-2008-005 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2008-005 and should be submitted on or before April 15, 2008.
March 18, 2008.
* * * * *
* * * * *
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2008-005. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (
http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of FINRA.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[6]