This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Rebates to Specialists for Options Transaction Fees Resulting From Linkage P/A Orders
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
6
as of
07/14/2026 at 4:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]
notice is hereby given that on March 20, 2008, the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Amex” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,[3]
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,[4]
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
Amex proposes to rebate options transaction fees incurred by specialists in connection with a principal acting as agent order (“P/A Order”) [5]
executed via the Intermarket Option Linkage (“Options Linkage” or “Linkage”). The text of the proposed rule change is available at Amex, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and
http://www.amex.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Purpose
The Exchange proposes to rebate options transaction fees incurred by specialists as a result of the obligation to send customer orders through the Linkage to the away options exchange disseminating the national best bid or offer (“NBBO”).[6]
A P/A Order is used by specialists for this purpose. Currently, a specialist will be charged two separate transaction fees upon completion of a transaction involving a P/A Order. First, the away options exchange will charge the P/A Order a transaction fee upon execution of the order. This fee varies by the particular options exchange. Second, in order to transfer the trade resulting from the P/A Order at the away options exchange into the customer account, the Amex specialist is then required to execute a trade on the Exchange. At this point, the Exchange will charge the applicable options transaction fees set forth in the Amex Options Fee Schedule to the specialist. This proposal seeks to rebate these exchange transaction fees incurred by specialists as a result of the obligations imposed by the Options Linkage.
The current Amex Options Fee Schedule imposes a charge of $0.20 per contract side on specialist trades in equity options and $0.31 per contract side on specialist trades for index options. In connection with transferring the P/A Order execution into the customer account, the Amex specialist will incur a charge of $0.20 or $0.31 per contract side, depending on whether the option is an equity option or index option. Under this proposal, the Exchange will rebate the transaction charges incurred by the specialist to transfer the P/A Order execution into the customer account.[7]
In addition, on a monthly basis, the Exchange will calculate the amount of the transaction fees incurred by the specialist in connection with his or her obligation to send P/A Orders to away options exchanges. This amount will also be
( printed page 19914)
credited to the specialist account for that month's charges.
In order for a specialist to be subject to the fee rebates under this proposal, the Exchange will require that specialists use the “Auto Route” functionality in ANTE for orders up to 1,000 contracts.[8]
Auto Route automatically sends a P/A Order through the Linkage to execute against the NBBO at another options exchange.[9]
The Exchange believes that this proposal to rebate specialist transaction charges associated with P/A Orders is necessary in order for the Exchange to remain competitive with other options exchanges that currently provide transaction fee rebates/credits for executing orders through the Linkage. The Exchange states that both the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. have fee rebate or credit programs for fees incurred executing orders through the Linkage.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,[10]
in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),[11]
in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange believes that the proposal provides for an equitable allocation of reasonable fees among members consistent with Section 6(b)(4),[12]
by rebating/crediting transaction fees incurred by a specialist as a result of the obligation imposed by the sending of P/A Orders through the Linkage.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) [13]
of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) [14]
thereunder, because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge applicable only to a member imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Send an e-mail torule-comments@sec.gov.
Please include File Number SR-Amex-2008-28 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
April 4, 2008.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2008-28. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (
http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Amex-2008-28 and should be submitted on or before May 2, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[15]
5.
A P/A Order as defined in Amex Rule 940(b)(10)(i) means an order for the principal account of a specialist (or equivalent entity on another Participant exchange that is authorized to represent Public Customer Orders), reflecting the terms of a related unexecuted Public Customer Order for which the specialist is acting as agent.
See
Section 2(16)(a) of the Plan for the Purpose of Creating and Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage.
6.
The proposed fee rebate of transaction fees incurred by specialists as a result of the obligation to send P/A Orders does not include the rebate of OCC fees and clearing firm fees associated with P/A Orders.
See
e-mail from Jeff Burns, Vice President & Associate General Counsel, Amex, to Brian O'Neill, Attorney, and Molly Kim, Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission, on April 1, 2008 (“April 1 E-mail”).
7.
The proposal to rebate transaction fees incurred by specialists as a result of the obligations imposed by the Options Linkage would also include any specialist subject to the BD Auto-Ex Fee. This could occur if a specialist submitted an order electronically through order-entry lines, such as CMS and/or FIX, for automatic execution, for the purpose of transferring a trade resulting from the P/A Order at the away options exchange into the customer account. The Exchange would then charge to the specialist, the BD Auto-Ex Fee together with the other applicable options transaction fees set forth in the Options Fee Schedule. The proposal set forth in this proposal seeks to rebate these transaction fees incurred by a specialist.
See
e-mail from the Jeff Burns, Vice President & Associate General Counsel, Amex, to Brian O'Neill, Attorney, and Molly Kim, Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission, on April 3, 2008.
8.
As long as a specialist satisfies this condition, such specialist would be eligible for the fee rebate, regardless of the size of the order received. For example, if the specialist satisfies the rebate condition and sets the Auto Route functionality in ANTE for orders up to 1,000 contracts, such specialist would be eligible for the fee rebate even though the order received is greater than 1,000 contracts and thereby not subject to auto routing but to manual handling by the specialist.
See
April 1 E-mail,
supra
note 6.
9.
Auto Route automatically sends a P/A Order through the Linkage to execute against the NBBO at another options exchange if such order is not executable against the Amex best bid or offer.
See
April 1 E-mail,
supra
note 6.