SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Version

The electronic file of this document is available on the date of publication in the Federal Register at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​fr/​index.html.

Background

We select a representative payee for certain persons eligible for Social Security benefits under title II of the Social Security Act (the Act), special veterans benefits (SVB) under title VIII of the Act, or supplemental security income under title XVI of the Act. See sections 205(j), 807, and 1631(a)(2) of the Act. We select a representative payee if we believe that payment through a payee rather than direct payment of benefits is in the interest of that beneficiary. Subpart U of part 404, subpart F of part 408, and subpart F of part 416 of our regulations explain the procedures we follow when determining whether to make representative payment and in selecting a representative payee under the title II, VIII and XVI programs.

Our current rules at 20 CFR 404.2024 and 416.624 require that, before selecting an individual or organization to act as a person's representative payee, we will investigate the payee applicant to determine the applicant's suitability. Our rule at § 408.624 adopts these investigatory requirements for SVBs by cross-reference to § 404.2024. See sections 205(j)(2), 807(b), and 1631(a)(2)(B) of the Act.

The Act states that to the extent practicable, an investigation shall include a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant. See sections 205(j)(2)(A)(i), 807(b)(1)(A), and 1631(a)(2)(B)(i)(I). Based on this authority, our current rules at §§ 404.2024 and 416.624 indicate that we generally conduct a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant each time they file to become a payee, regardless of whether the payee has previously satisfied the investigation criteria and participated in a face-to-face interview.

The requirement for holding a face-to-face interview may be waived only if conducting the interview is impracticable and would cause undue hardship for the payee applicant such as when a payee applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office. Our current rules also indicate that we may decide it is impracticable to require subsequent face-to-face interviews for organizational payees that are known by our field office as suitable payees. We base this decision on the organization's past performance, recent contacts, and the organization's knowledge of and compliance with our reporting requirements.

Explanation of Changes

With these final rules, we are eliminating the requirement that we conduct a face-to-face interview before selecting an individual or organization to be a representative payee if we have already conducted a face-to-face interview with that payee and the payee is qualified and currently acting as a payee. However, we retain discretionary authority to require a subsequent face-to-face interview of any payee applicant. We are revising our rules in §§ 404.2024(b) and 416.624(b) to accomplish these changes.

We also have added a new paragraph (c), “Impracticable,” to §§ 404.2024 and 416.624. This new paragraph contains the first three sentences of current §§ 404.2024(b) and 416.624(b), with editorial changes. We are not making substantive changes to this text.

Public Comment

In the notice of proposed rulemaking we published in the Federal Register at 73 FR 12923 (March 11, 2008), we provided the public a 60-day period within which to comment on the proposed changes. That comment period ended on May 12, 2008. We received one comment, from an individual who opposed the proposed changes.

Comment: The commenter noted that because the representative payment program removes the beneficiary's right to manage his own benefit payments, we must act with extreme care when determining the need for a payee and in selecting the person or organization that would best serve as a payee. The commenter believed that in order to protect beneficiary rights, we should require all payee applicants to undergo a face-to-face interview every time they apply to be a payee. Accordingly, the commenter asked that we withdraw our proposal to eliminate such a ( printed page 66521) requirement. In the alternative, the commenter suggested that if we adopt these changes, we should consider reviewing the payee's activities with regard to other beneficiaries before waiving subsequent face-to-face interviews.

Response: Although we share the commenter's concern that payees must manage benefits properly, we do not accept the commenter's suggestion to withdraw this rule. Under our current rules, there are nine criteria that must be met before selecting an individual or organization to act as a representative payee. See §§ 404.2024(a) and 416.624(a). Eight of these criteria remain unchanged. We are changing only our requirement regarding subsequent face-to-face interviews for payees who previously satisfied all of our criteria, including a face-to-face interview, and are qualified and currently acting as payees.

Our rules regarding recovery of misused benefits and potential civil monetary penalties remain unchanged and will continue to protect beneficiaries from payee misuse of benefits. As an added protection, we also retain the discretion to perform a subsequent face-to-face interview if we believe one is necessary. Our final rules specifically note that we base the decision concerning the necessity of a subsequent face-to-face interview on the payee's past performance and the payee's knowledge of and compliance with our reporting requirements. Because the final rules provide that we look at the payee's past performance, they address the commenter's concern that we review the payee's activities with regard to other beneficiaries prior to waiving a subsequent face-to-face interview. Additionally, our existing rules at §§ 404.2024(a)(5) and 416.624(a)(5) require that we determine whether the payee applicant has previously served as a representative payee and whether any previous appointment as a payee was terminated for misuse. Thus, we made no changes from the rules we proposed.

Regulatory Procedures

Executive Order 12866, as Amended

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) determined that the final rules meet the criteria for a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as amended. Thus, OMB reviewed these final rules.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

We certify that these final rules will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they affect only individuals. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis as provided in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, is not required.

Paperwork Reduction Act

These final rules impose no reporting or recordkeeping requirements subject to OMB clearance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security—Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004, Social Security—Survivors Insurance; 96.006, Supplemental Security Income; 96.020, Special Benefits for Certain World War II Veterans.)

For the reasons set out in the preamble, we amend subpart U of part 404 and subpart F of part 416 of chapter III of title 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:

1. The authority citation for subpart U continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 205(a), (j), and (k), and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(a), (j), and (k), and 902(a)(5)).

2. Amend § 404.2024 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by adding new paragraph (c) as follows:

1. The authority citation for subpart F continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1631 (a)(2) and (d)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5) and 1383 (a)(2) and (d)(1)).

2. Amend § 416.624 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by adding new paragraph (c) as follows: