This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry entitled “Adverse Event Reporting—Improving Human Subject Protection.” This guidance is intended to assist the research community in interpreting requirements for submitting reports of unanticipated problems, including certain adverse events reports, to institutional review boards (IRBs). FDA developed this guidance in response to concerns raised by the IRB community that increasingly large volumes of individual, unanalyzed adverse event reports are inhibiting, rather than enhancing, the ability of IRBs to adequately protect human subjects. The guidance provides recommendations to IRBs, sponsors, and investigators on improving the usefulness of the adverse event information submitted to IRBs. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is issuing the final rule entitled “Institutional Review Boards; Registration Requirements.”
Submit written or electronic comments on agency guidances at any time.
Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. Submit written comments on the guidance to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Griffin, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-2270, e-mail: Joseph.Griffin@fda.hhs.gov.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for clinical investigators, sponsors, and IRBs entitled “Adverse Event Reporting—Improving Human Subject Protection.” Under the regulations in 21 CFR part 50 (Protection of Human Subjects), part 56 (21 CFR part 56) (Institutional Review Boards), part 312 (21 CFR part 312) (Investigational New Drug Application), and part 812 (21 CFR part 812) (Investigational Device Exemptions), an IRB must review and approve a clinical study before the study is initiated. Additionally, after an IRB's initial review and approval, an IRB must conduct continuing review of the study at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk presented by the study, at least annually. The primary purpose of both the initial review of a study and the periodic review of the conduct of the study is to ensure the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects. To do its job, an IRB must be informed of any unanticipated problems in the study and any changes in the research activity. This guidance discusses adverse event reporting to IRBs by sponsors and investigators and emphasizes the value of well-analyzed adverse event data to an IRB review.
A notice announcing the draft version of this guidance published in the Federal Register on April 9, 2007 (72 FR 17562). After carefully considering all received comments, the agency is finalizing that guidance. The draft and the final have relatively minor substantive differences. The recommendations section in the final Start Printed Page 2600guidance is streamlined and re-organized to make the information clearer and more accessible, but there are no major policy differences. The final guidance also omits much of the background discussion about the origin and nature of the adverse event reporting problem that the guidance addresses because that information is tangential to the goals of the guidance.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the agency's current thinking on adverse event reporting for the purpose of improving human subject protection. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to previously approved collections of information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in part 56 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0130; the collections of information in part 312 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0014; and the collections of information in part 812 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0078.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only through FDMS at http://www.regulations.gov.Start Signature
Dated: December 22, 2008.
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-683 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S