Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series airplanes. This proposed AD would require modifying the fluid drain path in the wing leading edge area, forward of the wing front spar and doing all applicable related investigative and corrective actions. This proposed AD results from a report received of leaking fuel from the wing leading edge area at the inboard end of the number 5 leading edge slat. We are proposing this AD to prevent flammable fluids from accumulating in the wing leading edge and draining inboard and onto the engine exhaust nozzle, which could result in a fire.
We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 22, 2009.
You may send comments by any of the following methods:
- Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
- Fax: 202-493-2251.
- Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
- Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-Start Printed Page 1568430, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sam Spitzer, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6510; fax (425) 917-6590.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include “Docket No. FAA-2009-0288; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-214-AD” at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.
We have been notified that leaking fuel from the wing leading edge area at the inboard end of the number 5 leading edge slat was discovered during a post-flight inspection on a Model 737 airplane with a fuel quantity of over 2,500 lbs. Subsequent investigation found that the leak occurred in an area of the front spar that does not have a proper drain path and appears to have been caused by a loose retaining nut of the slat track down stop. This led to the fuel draining onto the engine exhaust nozzle. This condition, if not corrected, could result in flammable fluids accumulating in the wing leading edge and draining inboard and onto the engine exhaust nozzle, which could result in a fire.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-1293, dated November 13, 2008 (“the service bulletin”). The service bulletin describes procedures for modifying the fluid drain path in the wing leading edge area, forward of the wing front spar.
For Group 1 airplanes, the modification includes applying sealant to the cavities between the inboard slat track ribs and leading edge lower panels at certain slat stations in the left and right wings; installing a flame arrestor tube through the vapor barrier rib at the outboard leading edge strakelet box to direct fluids to the strut drain system; applying sealant to create a form-in-place gasket at the blowout door located under the strakelet box to prevent fluids from leaking onto the engine exhaust nozzle; replacing the existing seal in the fuel shut-off valve access door with a bulb seal to prevent flammable fluid leakage onto the engine exhaust nozzle; trimming the blowout door hinge; and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. The related investigative and corrective actions include doing a leak test and reapplying sealant.
For Group 2 airplanes, the modification includes removing the parting agent and sealant at the lower leading edge access panel immediately outboard of the fuel shutoff valve access door in the left and right wings, and installing new parting agent and sealant; and doing related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. The related investigative actions include inspecting the blowout door hinge for trim and doing a leak test. The corrective actions include trimming the blowout door hinge and reapplying sealant.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of this Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the(se) same type design(s). This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 754 airplanes of U.S. registry. The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.
|Action||Work hours||Average labor rate per hour||Parts||Cost per product||Number of U.S.- registered airplanes||Fleet cost|
|Modification, Group 1||45||$80||$1,545||$5,145||Up to 754||Up to $3,879,330.|
|Install parting agent Group 2||23||80||None||1,840||Up to 754||Up to $1,387,360.|
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. “Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,” describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in “Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures Start Printed Page 15685the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a “significant rule” under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39End List of Subjects
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:Start Part
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2009-0288; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-214-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 22, 2009.
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-1293, dated November 13, 2008.
(d) This AD results from a report received of leaking fuel from the wing leading edge area at the inboard end of the number 5 leading edge slat. We are issuing this AD to prevent flammable fluids from accumulating in the wing leading edge and draining inboard and onto the engine exhaust nozzle, which could result in a fire.
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done.
(f) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, modify the fluid drain path in the wing leading edge area, forward of the wing front spar, and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, by accomplishing all applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-1293, dated November 13, 2008. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Sam Spitzer, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6510; fax (425) 917-6590.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 12, 2009.
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-7769 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P