Skip to Content

During the funding lapse, is not being supported. If data feeds are not available from GPO, will not be updated, so please use the official edition of the Federal Register on Govinfo ( If there is a technical issue with the Public Inspection List, you can view the documents on public inspection at our office in Washington, DC or on


Submission for OMB review; Comment Request; 24-hour Dietary Recall Method Comparison and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Validation and Observational Feeding Studies

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document including its time on Public Inspection. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble


Under the provisions of Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve the information collection listed below. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on June 3, 2009 (74 FR 26702) and allowed 60-days for public comment. One public comment was received on June 5 requesting a copy of the data collection plans. The plans were sent to the responder on June 10. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment. The National Institutes of Health may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection that has been extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Proposed Collection: Title: 24-hour Dietary Recall Method Comparison and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Validation and Observational Feeding Studies. Type of Information Collection Request: NEW. Need and Use of Information Collection: The objective of the two studies is to compare the performance of the newly developed computerized Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24) approach to collecting 24-hour recall (24HR) data with the current standard, the interviewer-administered Automated Multiple Pass Method (AMPM). The ultimate goal is to determine to what extent the new automated instrument can be used instead of the more expensive interviewer-administered instrument in the collection of dietary intake data. Frequency of Response: Twice. Affected Public: Individuals. Type of Respondents: For the 24-hour Dietary Recall Method Comparison study, approximately 1,200 adult members from three health maintenance organization plans (in Minnesota, California, and Michigan) between ages 20 and 70 years. For the NCI Observational Feeding Study, approximately 90 adult residents from the Washington, DC metropolitan area between ages 20 and 70 years. The annual reporting burden is estimated at 1052 hours (see table below). This amounts to an estimated 2105 burden hours over the 2-year data collection period with a total cost to the respondents $37,210. There are no Capital costs, Operating costs, and/or Maintenance Costs to report.

Study QuestionnaireNumber of respondentsFrequency of responseAverage time response (Minutes)Annual hour burden
24HR recall comparison study:
Information and Consent650115/60162.50
Dietary Recall 1540130/60270.00
Dietary Recall 2486130/60243.00
Demographics questionnaire54018/6072.00
Start Printed Page 39963
Preference survey24313/6012.15
NCI validation and observational feeding study:
Reminder Telephone Call9013/604.50
Eating 3 meals901135/60202.50
Dietary Recall80130/6040.00
Demographics questionnaire8018/6010.67

Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proposed performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information may have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Direct Comments to OMB: Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Attention: NIH Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, at or by fax to 202-395-6974. To request more information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans, contact Frances E. Thompson, PhD, Project Officer, National Cancer Institute, NIH, EPN 4095A, 6130 Executive Boulevard MSC 7335, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7335, or call non-toll-free number 301-594-4410, or FAX your request to 301-435-3710, or e-mail your request, including your address, to

Comments Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of the date of this publication.

Start Signature

Dated: July 31, 2009.

Vivian Horovitch-Kelley,

NCI Project Clearance Liaison, National Institutes of Health.

End Signature End Preamble

[FR Doc. E9-19022 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]