SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Agency administers the TSP, which was established by the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA), Public Law 99-335, 100 Stat. 514. The TSP provisions of FERSA are codified, as amended, largely at 5 U.S.C. 8351 and 8401-79. The TSP is a tax-deferred retirement savings plan for Federal civilian employees and members of the uniformed services. The TSP is similar to cash or deferred arrangements established for private-sector employees under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 401(k)).

On October 22, 2009, the Agency published a proposed rule with request for comments in the Federal Register (74 FR 54491). The Agency received one comment on the proposed rule and that comment supported the Agency's proposed change to its method of calculating court order awards. Therefore, the Agency is publishing the proposed rule as final without change.

Uniformed Services Accounts

The Agency amends its regulations regarding uniformed services accounts, and, specifically, its provisions relating to the division of a uniformed services account pursuant to a court order or legal process. The amendment removes a provision suggesting that courts could direct the Plan to make a court-ordered payment other than one that is pro rata from both taxable and tax-exempt contributions.

Uniformed services accounts are unique in that some or all of a uniformed services member's contributions may derive from tax-exempt income as a result of the combat zone tax exclusion. In 2001, the Agency issued final regulations regarding the uniformed services' participation in the TSP. Among many changes, the Agency determined that “the TSP can honor a court order or legal process that apportions combat zone (tax-exempt) contributions between the participant and the payee,” and, therefore, the final version of 5 CFR 1604.9(b) regarding court-ordered payments from a uniformed services member's account stated that payment will be made pro rata from all sources “unless the court order or legal process directs otherwise.” (66 FR 50716, October 4, 2001).

The Agency recently analyzed its authority and record keeping capability to issue payments from, as the regulation suggests, only one source of contributions in a uniformed services participant's account. The Agency has concluded that the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) permits only pro rata payments from both taxable and tax-exempt funds, and that a court cannot direct the Plan to make a payment from, for example, only tax-exempt funds.

Specifically, I.R.C. sections 72 and 402(e)(1)(A) preclude an allocation of basis pursuant to a court order if such allocation is other than pro rata. In particular, for purposes of determining tax liability, a spousal alternate payee is treated the same as the participant and, therefore, a distribution to a spouse or former spouse made pursuant to a court order must be made pro rata from taxable and tax-exempt amounts in a uniformed services account. 26 U.S.C. 402(e)(1)(A). Therefore, the Agency's regulation permitting courts to order a payment other than prorata is not permitted by the I.R.C. and is amended.

Additionally, the Agency's record keeping system cannot issue a payment from only one source of funds because it is programmed to make all payments from uniformed services accounts on a prorata basis from taxable and tax-exempt balances. Therefore, changing this regulation to remove the language which suggests a court could direct the Agency to issue a payment other than one which is pro rata is not only technically correct but also reflects current record keeping processes.

Death Benefits

The Agency amends its regulations regarding death benefits, and, in particular, its regulation regarding payment to a participant's child or children. Specifically, the amendment clarifies the documentation children should submit in the event that the identity of their father or mother is in dispute or unclear.

As familial matters, including guidelines related to parentage, are rooted in state, not Federal, law, the Agency cannot adjudicate or otherwise determine matters of paternity or maternity. In support of their contention that they are the proper beneficiary of their parent's account, children of deceased participants often submit insufficient or otherwise unclear documentation (e.g., copies of obituaries and personal mementos). A lack of guidance regarding which documents to submit in support of parentage adds unnecessary time and inconvenience to the processing of death benefit determinations. ( printed page 63062)

The Agency, therefore, augments its death benefits regulations to describe the documentation it requires in support of a purported child's claim that a participant was his or her parent. Specifically, the Agency requests that affected children submit a court order or administrative finding or documentation which would establish parentage in the state in which the participant resided prior to his death.

Court Orders and Legal Processes Affecting Thrift Savings Plan Accounts

The Agency amends its court order regulations to allow for court-awarded payments which account for investment earnings and losses as well as to reflect the previously-discussed requirement that all payments from participants' accounts be paid pro rata.

Currently, in order for the Agency to take into account investment losses, a court order has to divide the account as of the date of distribution or identify a fixed amount that the parties agreed upon. Further, per the Agency's regulations, if a court order specifies that earnings are to be awarded and no specific rate is provided, even when an account experiences investment losses, the Agency awards earnings using its Government Securities Investment (G) Fund rate. 5 CFR 1653.4(f)(3).

The Agency, which receives many court orders directing that payments reflect earnings and losses until the date of distribution, amends its regulations so that the division of an account factors in the current price of those shares included in a payee's award amount.

In particular, if earnings, defined to include losses, are requested and a rate is not specified, the Agency will determine the amount to be awarded by determining the payee's award amount (e.g., the percentage or fraction of the participant's account), and, based on the participant's investment allocation as of the effective date of the court order, the number and composition of shares that the payee's award amount would have purchased as of the effective date. (Determining the shares as of the effective date of the court order, and not a later date, preserves the court's intent and protects the payee from investment decisions made by the participant after the effective date of the court order.) The Agency will then multiply the price per share as of the payment date, which is generally two business days prior to the date of the award's disbursement, by the number and composition of shares comprising the payee's award amount as of the court order's effective date.

The Agency believes that this calculation will result in more equitable awards as well as more efficient court order processing as parties are not required to return to court for additional or clarifying language.

As previously discussed, the Agency also amends its court order and legal process regulations in order to conform with the I.R.C. and current record keeping procedures. In particular, the Agency removes language from § 1653.5(d) which states that a court may specify a particular payment from the tax-exempt balance of a uniformed services account. Please see the Supplementary Information discussion regarding Uniformed Services Accounts for an overview as to why the Agency is removing such language.

Thrift Savings Plan

The Agency adds a regulation outlining the circumstances under which a participant's account may be frozen and when access to the Agency's Web site and ThriftLine may be blocked. Though uncommon, freezes (or administrative holds) prevent a participant from withdrawing funds, including loans, from his or her account, and, therefore, the Agency is providing regulatory notice to its participants regarding the circumstances under which such a hold may occur and also the consequences of such a hold.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This regulation will affect Federal employees and members of the uniformed services who participate in the Thrift Savings Plan, which is a Federal defined contribution retirement savings plan created under the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA), Public Law 99-335, 100 Stat. 514, and administered by the Agency.

Paperwork Reduction Act

I certify that these regulations do not require additional reporting under the criteria of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

Pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 602, 632, 653, 1501-1571, the effects of this regulation on state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector have been assessed. This regulation will not compel the expenditure in any one year of $100 million or more by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector. Therefore, a statement under section 1532 is not required.

Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 810(a)(1)(A), the Agency submitted a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States before publication of this rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a major rule as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Agency amends 5 CFR chapter VI as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 1604 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8440e, 8474(b)(5) and (c)(1).

2. Amend § 1604.9 to revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:

3. The authority citation for part 1651 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8424(d), 8432(j), 8433(e), 8435(c)(2), 8474(b)(5) and 8474(c)(1).

4. Amend § 1651.1 to add the definition of “Administrative finding”, in alphabetical order, in paragraph (b) to read as follows:

5. Amend § 1651.6 to add a paragraph (d) to read as follows:

6. The authority citation for part 1653 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8435, 8436(b), 8437(e), 8439(a)(3), 8467, 8474(b)(5) and 8474(c)(1).

7. Amend § 1653.1 to add the definitions of “Payment date” and “TSP investment earnings or earnings”, in alphabetical order, in paragraph (b) to read as follows:

8. Amend § 1653.4 to revise paragraph (f)(3) and remove paragraph (f)(4) to read as follows:

9. Amend § 1653.5 by removing the last sentence of paragraph (d).

10. The authority citation for part 1690 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8474.

11. Add § 1690.15 to read as follows: