Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
In this interim rule, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) revises its regulations regarding inmate contact with the community to delete two current Bureau regulations that prohibit inmates from publishing under a byline, due to a recent court ruling invalidating Bureau regulation language containing this prohibition.
Comments are due by June 22, 2010.
Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Qureshi, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments received are considered part of the public record and made available for public inspection online at http://www.regulations.gov. Such information includes personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it to be posted online, you must include the phrase “PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION” in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include the phrase “CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION” in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment contains so much confidential business information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information identified and located as set forth above will be placed in the agency's public docket file, but not posted online. Confidential business information identified and located as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person by appointment, please see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph.
In this interim rule, the Bureau revises its regulations regarding inmate contact with the community to delete two current Bureau regulations that prohibit inmates from publishing under a byline, due to a recent court ruling invalidating Bureau regulation language containing this prohibition.
Currently, 28 CFR 540.20(b) states as follows: “The inmate may not receive compensation or anything of value for correspondence with the news media. The inmate may not act as reporter or publish under a byline.”
Also, current 28 CFR 540.62(d) states as follows: “An inmate currently confined in an institution may not be employed or act as a reporter or publish under a byline.”
On August 9, 2007, in Jordan v. Pugh, 504 F.Supp.2d 1109 (D. Colo. 2007), the court issued a decision invalidating the byline language of § 540.20(b). The court found that not all inmate publishing under a byline jeopardizes security, and overruled the byline portion of the provision as facially overbroad for prohibiting all such activity. The Bureau is not appealing this decision. We Start Printed Page 21164therefore alter the regulations accordingly.
Further, due to the court's findings regarding § 540.20(b), the identical provision in § 540.62(d) will also be deleted.
Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)) allows exceptions to notice-and-comment rulemaking “when the agency for good cause finds * * * that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Further, § 553(d) provides an exception to the usual requirement of a delayed effective date when an agency finds “good cause” that the rule be made immediately effective.
This rulemaking is exempt from normal notice-and-comment procedures because advance notice and public comment in this instance is impracticable. It is impracticable to invite public comment on the result of a court order which invalidated the regulatory provision which we now seek to remove. Further, prompt implementation of the court order is necessary to protect the Bureau from liability arising from potential application of an invalidated regulation, and to afford inmates the benefit of the court's decision. Otherwise, this rulemaking makes no change to any rights or responsibilities of the agency or any regulated entities. For the same reasons, the Bureau finds that “good cause” exists to make this rule effective upon publication. Nevertheless, the Bureau invites public comment on this interim rule.
Executive Order 12866
This regulation falls within a category of actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined to constitute “significant regulatory actions” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, accordingly, it was reviewed by OMB.
The Bureau of Prisons has assessed the costs and benefits of this regulation as required by Executive Order 12866 Section 1(b)(6) and has made a reasoned determination that the benefits of this regulation justify its costs. There will be no new costs associated with this regulation.
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132, we determine that this regulation does not have sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation and by approving it certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This regulation pertains to the correctional management of offenders and immigration detainees committed to the custody of the Attorney General or the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, and its economic impact is limited to the Bureau's appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This regulation will not result in the expenditure by State, local and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This regulation is not a major rule as defined by § 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This regulation will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 540End List of Subjects Start Signature
Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in the Attorney General inEnd Amendment Part Start Part
PART 540—CONTACT WITH PERSONS IN THE COMMUNITYEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. Revise the authority citation forEnd Amendment Part
Subpart B—CorrespondenceStart Amendment Part
2. Revise § 540.20(b) as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) The inmate may not receive compensation or anything of value for correspondence with the news media. The inmate may not act as reporter.
Subpart E—Contact With News MediaStart Amendment Part
3. Revise § 540.62(d) as follows:End Amendment Part
(d) An inmate currently confined in an institution may not be employed or act as a reporter.
[FR Doc. 2010-9373 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P