Delaware River Basin Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC or “Commission”) will hold a public hearing to receive comments on proposed amendments to the Commission's Water Quality Regulations, Water Code and Comprehensive Plan to update many of the Commission's stream quality objectives (also called water quality criteria) for human health and aquatic life for toxic pollutants in the Delaware Estuary (DRBC Water Quality Zones 2 through 5) and to extend application of the criteria to Delaware Bay (DRBC Water Quality Zone 6). The proposed changes will bring the Commission's criteria for toxic pollutants into conformity with current guidance published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and provide a more consistent regulatory framework for managing the tidal portion of the main stem Delaware River.
The public hearing will take place on Thursday, September 23, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. and will continue on that day until all those who wish to testify are afforded an opportunity to do so. Written comments will be accepted through 5 p.m. on Friday, October 1, 2010.
The public hearing will take place in the Goddard Room at the Commission's office building, located at 25 State Police Drive, West Trenton, New Jersey. Driving directions are available on the Commission's Web site, http://www.drbc.net. Please do not rely on Internet mapping services as they may not provide accurate directions to this location.
Written comments may be submitted by e-mail to email@example.com by fax to Regulations at 609-883-9522; by U.S. Mail to Regulations c/o Commission Secretary, DRBC, P.O. Box 7360, West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360; or by private mail carrier to Regulations c/o Commission Secretary, DRBC, 25 State Police Drive, West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360. In all cases, please include the commenter's name, address and affiliation if any in the comment and include “Water Quality Criteria” in the subject line.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The current rule and the full text of the proposed amendments are posted on the Commission's Web site, http://www.drbc.net, along with the report entitled “Water Quality Criteria for Toxic Pollutants for Zones 2-6 of the Delaware Estuary: Basis and Background Document” (DRBC, June 2010) and a set of PowerPoint slides presented to the Commission at the latter's public meeting on December 9, 2009 by the chair of the Commission's Toxics Advisory Committee. Hard copies of these materials may be obtained for the price of postage by contacting Ms. Paula Schmitt at 609-883-9500, ext. 224. For questions about the technical basis for the rule, please contact Dr. Ronald MacGillivray at 609-477-7252. For queries about the rulemaking process, please contact Pamela Bush at 609-477-7203.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Background. At the request of the states of Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, which border the Delaware Estuary (hereinafter, “the Estuary States”), the Commission in 1996 adopted water quality criteria for human health and aquatic life for Water Quality Zones 2 through 5 (Trenton, New Jersey to Delaware Bay) of the main stem Delaware River and the tidal portions of its tributaries for a set of pollutants that included the list of Priority Pollutants published by the EPA in accordance with section 307 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA); other pollutants for which EPA had published national recommended criteria in accordance with section 304(a) of the CWA; and additional pollutants for which one or more of the Estuary States had adopted criteria. See 40 CFR 401.15 (consisting of a list of 65 toxic pollutants, including categories of pollutants, for which effluent limitations are required in accordance with section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1317(a)(1)); Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 423 (consisting of a list of 129 “Priority Pollutants,” individual chemicals and forms of chemicals for which EPA has established national criteria); and 33 U.S.C. 1314(a) (providing for criteria development and publication by EPA).Start Printed Page 41107
Managing an interstate waterway that is simultaneously an industrial and commercial hub, a source of drinking water for urban and suburban populations in three states and a fragile tidal ecosystem is a complex task. After nearly fifteen years of applying uniform human health and aquatic life criteria in the Delaware Estuary, the Commission has determined that maintaining a uniform set of criteria in a single regulatory code is an essential predicate to measuring and managing the ecological health of this vital interstate resource.
Since 1996, EPA has updated its guidance for the development of human health water quality criteria and its list of national recommended water quality criteria for many toxic pollutants to reflect advances in scientific knowledge. Although the states have independently amended some of their criteria to conform to the current guidance and national recommended criteria, the Commission has not yet done so. The result is that many of DRBC's estuary toxics criteria are not currently consistent with state criteria, best available science, or current EPA guidance. Moreover, because the Bay and Estuary comprise a single tidal system in which each water quality zone is at times downstream and at times upstream of the adjacent zone or zones, regulators, dischargers and other stakeholders have determined that they are ill-served by excluding the Bay from application of uniform criteria in the Estuary. Amending the criteria at this time is necessary to restore consistency and fairness in the regulation of discharges, to facilitate coordination among state and federal programs and to continue to ensure that regulation of water quality in the shared interstate waters of the Estuary and Bay is based on the best science available.
The proposed amendments to the Commission's human health and aquatic life criteria for the Estuary and Bay were developed by the Commission's standing Toxics Advisory Committee (TAC), comprised of representatives of the four basin states—Delaware, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania—and members of the academic, agricultural, public health, industrial and municipal sectors and non-governmental environmental community. The TAC in 2007 adopted as its objectives (a) evaluating recent data and current methodologies for establishing water quality criteria for toxic pollutants and (b) developing recommendations for revising the Commission's 1996 criteria to reflect current science and risk assessment procedures and provide for consistency across interstate waters. The TAC's recommendations were formally presented to the Commissioners at a public meeting on December 9, 2009 by then TAC chair, Christopher S. Crocket of the Philadelphia Water Department. Dr. Crockett's PowerPoint presentation is available on the Commission's Web site.
No Change Proposed to Criteria for PCBs and Taste and Odor. The amendments proposed by the Commission in this rulemaking do not include changes to the Commission's criteria for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), currently listed in Table 6 (criteria for carcinogens) and Table 7 (criteria for systemic toxicants) of Article 3 of the Commission's Water Quality Regulations and Water Code, or to the criteria to protect the taste and odor of ingested water and fish, set forth in Table 4 of the same Article. The Commission initiated a separate rulemaking in August of 2009 to update its human health criteria for carcinogenic effects for PCBs in the Delaware Estuary (see 74 FR 41100). The comment period for that proposal ended on October 19, 2009 and the Commission has not yet approved a final rule. The current PCB criteria will continue in effect pending completion of the Commission's separate rulemaking for PCBs. The Commission's Toxics Advisory Committee has not yet taken up the matter of revisions to the criteria to protect taste and odor.
Proposed Changes. The Commission's criteria for human health and aquatic life in the Delaware Estuary are listed in tables 3, 5, 6 and 7 of section 3.30 “Interstate Streams—Tidal” of the Water Quality Regulations and Water Code. In addition to extending these criteria to Water Quality Zone 6, two major types of changes to the criteria are proposed: (1) Compounds are proposed to be added to or deleted from the four tables and (2) numeric criteria for many of the compounds currently listed in the tables are proposed to be revised. In addition, to assist users sub-headings have been added for categories of pollutants (metals, pesticides, etc.) and the sequence of the parameters has been modified to arrange them within these categories. Minor changes for consistency in spelling and capitalization are also proposed. The additions, deletions and criteria changes are proposed in order to make the list of regulated compounds consistent with current EPA guidance and to ensure the criteria are uniform throughout the shared waters. The Basis and Background Document cited above sets forth in detail the policies and technical assumptions on which the TAC relied in developing the revised criteria.
The proposed changes to tables 3, 5, 6 and 7 are described briefly below:
For Table 3, “Maximum Contaminant Levels [“MCLs”] to be Applied as Human Health Stream Quality Objectives in Zones 2 and 3”:
- Antimony, Cadmium, 1,2-Dichloropropane, Ethylbenzene and 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene are proposed to be removed because the proposed updates to Table 7 (criteria for systemic toxicants) would establish DRBC criteria for these compounds more stringent than the MCLs.
- Nickel is proposed to be removed because the MCL for nickel was withdrawn by the EPA.
- Chromium (total) is proposed to be replaced by Chromium III for consistency with current EPA guidance.
- Current MCL values for Beryllium, Copper, Lead, alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, 2,4-Dichloro-phenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), Methoxychlor, Toxaphene, Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD), 2,4,5-Trichloro-phenoxypropionic acid (2,4,5-TP-Silvex), Benzene, Carbon Tetrachloride, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, Dichloromethane (methylene chloride), Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), Toluene, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, Trichloroethylene, Vinyl Chloride, Benzo(a)pyrene, Asbestos, Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate, Fluoride, Nitrate, and Pentachlorophenol are proposed to be added because these MCL values were developed by EPA after 1996 in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1412g-1(b).
As to Table 5, “Stream Quality Objectives for Toxic Pollutants for the Protection of Aquatic Life”, Table 6, “Stream Quality Objectives for Carcinogens” and Table 7, “Stream Quality Objectives for Systemic Toxicants,” nearly all of the freshwater and marine criteria are proposed to be updated to conform to current EPA guidance, resulting in minor changes in most instances and substantial changes in some. Most but not all of the proposed criteria are more stringent than the existing criteria.
Proposed changes to Table 6 (criteria for carcinogens) also include the following:
- Beryllium and 1,1-Dichloroethene are proposed to be removed because EPA no longer lists these compounds as carcinogens.
- 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane is proposed to be removed because it is no longer recommended by the EPA for water quality criteria development.Start Printed Page 41108
- Arsenic, beta-BHC, N-Nitrosodi-N-butylamine, N-Nitrosodiethylamine, and N-Nitrosopyrrolidine are proposed to be added because EPA and an Estuary State have adopted criteria for them.
- Dinitrotoluene mixture (2, 4 & 2, 6) is proposed to be replaced by 2, 4-Dinitrotoluene to be consistent with current EPA guidance.
- Hexachlorobutadiene is proposed to be moved to Table 6 (criteria for carcinogens) from Table 7 because its toxicity is based on carcinogenicity.
Proposed changes to Table 7 (criteria for systemic toxicants) also include the following:
- 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane is proposed to be removed because it is no longer recommended by the EPA for water quality criteria development.
- Chromium (Total), Methylmercury, alpha-Endosulfan, beta-Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate, Endrin Aldehyde, Benzene, 2-Chloronaphthalene, Cyanide, 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol, Pentachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-benzene, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, and Vinyl Chloride are proposed to be added to Table 7 because EPA and an Estuary State adopted criteria for them.
- DDT is proposed to be replaced with “DDT and Metabolites (DDD and DDE)” to conform to current EPA guidance relating to the systemic toxicity of DDT and its degradation products, DDD and DDE. DDT, DDD and DDE, which are also deemed to be carcinogens, continue to be listed individually in Table 6.
- Hexachlorobutadiene has been moved from Table 7 to Table 6 because its toxicity is based on carcinogenicity.
- The column identifying EPA classifications is proposed to be removed from Table 7 because this information is not needed for application of the criteria for systemic toxicants. Detailed information on derivation of the criteria, including EPA classifications, is presented in the Basis and Background Document posted on DRBC's Web site.
Extension of Criteria to Delaware Bay (Zone 6). A new section 3.10.6C.11. is proposed to be added to make tables 3 through 7 of Article 3 of the Water Quality Regulations and Water Code applicable to Water Quality Zone 6, Delaware Bay.
It is proposed to amend the Water Quality Regulations and Water Code as follows:Start Printed Page 41109 Start Printed Page 41110 Start Printed Page 41111 Start Printed Page 41112 Start Printed Page 41113 Start Printed Page 41114 Start Printed Page 41115 Start Printed Page 41116 Start Printed Page 41117 Start Printed Page 41118 Start Signature
Dated: July 8, 2010.
Pamela M. Bush,
[FR Doc. 2010-17118 Filed 7-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6360-01-P