SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

This rule proposes to amend the FAR to implement the recommendations of GAO's Report to Congressional Committees 09-579 dated June 2009 on “Minimal Compliance with New Safeguards for Time-and-Materials Contracts for Commercial Services and Safeguards Have Not Been Applied to the GSA Schedules Program.” GAO was directed by the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2004 conference report to review the use of the new authority being authorized in section 1432 of the Act, the extent to which it had been used, the types of contracts for which the authority had been used, and the degree to which such use was in compliance with the safeguards included in section 1432 (including the requirement that time-and-material and labor-hour contracts be used only where no other contract type was suitable).

GAO reviewed contract files, interviewed contracting and procurement policy officials, and utilized legal interpretations of the applicability of the determination and findings (D&F) requirement to the GSA Schedules program. GAO believes that the evidence and findings obtained during its audit substantiates the conclusions and associated recommendations in the report. The ( printed page 59196) GAO audit revealed that, Governmentwide, contracting officers had the mistaken impression that the fixed labor rates in the time-and-material/labor-hour contracts make them fixed price type contracts. The audit further revealed that there was a general lack of awareness of the FAR part 12 determinations and findings requirement among contracting officers across all Government agencies in their review of contract actions more than two (2) years after the determinations and findings requirement was implemented in the FAR. There was a failure of management to detect the lack of compliance with these safeguards. GAO recommended that further action was required for the use of time-and-material contracts to acquire commercial services in order to help ensure that this contract type is used only when no other contract type is suitable and instill discipline in the determination of contract type with a view toward managing the risk to the Government. Therefore, GAO recommended that the following steps be taken:

• Amend FAR Subpart 16.6 (Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts) and FAR Subpart 16.2 (Fixed-Price Contracts) to make it clear that contracts with a fixed hourly labor rate and an estimated ceiling price are time-and-materials or labor-hour contracts, not fixed-price type contracts;
• Amend FAR Subpart 8.4 (pertaining to the Schedules program) to explicitly require the same safeguards for commercial time-and-materials services,i.e., the FAR part 12 determination and findings and the justification for changes to the ceiling price, that are required in FAR 12.207; and
• Provide guidance to contracting officials on the requirements in FAR 12.207 for the detailed determination and findings for time-and-materials or labor-hour contracts for commercial services and encourage agencies to provide training regarding the determination and findings requirement.

The requirement for executing a determination and findings when acquiring commercial services on a time-and-material or labor-hour basis is not new. The FAR used to prohibit the use of any other contract type except fixed price for the acquisition of commercial items. However, in 2003, the Services Acquisition Reform Act (SARA), amended Section 8002(d) of Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA) to explicitly provide that the FAR shall include the authority for the use of time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts for the procurement of certain commercial services (the commercial services in such a category are “of a type” of commercial services that are commonly sold to the general public through the use of time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts). FAR Case 2003-027 was published in the Federal Register at 71 FR 74667 on December 12, 2006, modified FAR 12.207, FAR 16.601, and FAR 52.212-4 to include an Alternate I, to permit the use of time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts for commercial services when no other contract type is suitable. When using a time-and-materials or labor-hour contract, a ceiling price must be included in time-and-material and labor-hour contracts, it must incorporate Alternate I to payment clause FAR 52.212-4 to safeguard records and audit rights, provide insight into contractor costs, and ensure that costs are monitored by the Government due to the inherent risks associated with time-and-materials and labor-hour types of contracts. This FAR case proposes to modify FAR 8.405-2 and 12.207 to require the contracting officer, when acquiring commercial services using a time-and-materials or labor-hour order, to execute a determination and findings explaining why no other contract type is suitable for the acquisition; and FAR 16.201 and 16.600 to state explicitly that time-and-materials/labor-hour contracts are not fixed price contracts. The determination and findings is required to contain several elements, including a description of the market research performed for the acquisition and a description of the actions planned to maximize the use of fixed-price contracts on future or follow-on acquisitions. This is similar to the requirements in FAR 12.207 for a time-and-materials/labor-hour contract for commercial services. Currently, neither FAR 12.207 nor FAR subpart 8.4 explicitly mentions the requirement for the contracting officer to execute a determination and findings when placing orders against Schedules under FAR subpart 8.4. GSA establishes contracts for commercial supplies and services against which Government agencies can issue orders.

This proposed rule therefore builds on the existing Services Acquisition Reform Act (SARA) Panel recommendation to permit the use of time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts or orders when acquiring commercial services as long as a determination and findings is executed by the contracting officer consistent with FAR 12.207 and FAR 16.601 when ordering services under Schedules. Therefore, the determination and findings requirement is proposed to be added to FAR subpart 8.4 for Schedule orders to make it clear that contracting officers must execute, prior to placing the order, a determination and findings that a fixed-price order is not suitable. The FAR is proposed to be further revised as follows:

(1) At FAR 8.405-2, Ordering procedures for services requiring a statement of work, paragraph (e), Use of time-and-materials and labor-hour orders for services, is added to incorporate the requirement for a determination and findings consistent with FAR 12.207 and 16.601(d).

(2) Section 12.207(b)(4) is added as a cross-reference to 8.405-2(e) for determination and findings when using Federal Supply Schedules.

(3) Section 16.201, which sets forth the general description of a fixed-price contract, has been modified to clarify that time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts are not fixed-price contracts.

(4) Section 16.600, which sets forth the scope of time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts, is added to clarify that time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts are not fixed price contracts. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Councils do not expect this proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule does not impose any additional requirements on small businesses. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has, therefore, not been performed. We invite comments from small businesses and other interested parties. The Councils will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected FAR Parts 8, 12, and 16 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. (FAR case 2009-043), in correspondence.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed changes to the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, et seq.

Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 8, 12, and 16 as set forth below:

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 8, 12, and 16 continues to read as follows:

Authority : 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).