Skip to Content

Rule

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Identification of Critical Safety Items (DFARS Case 2010-D022)

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble

AGENCY:

Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add a contract clause that clearly identifies any items being purchased that are critical safety items so that the proper risk-based surveillance can be performed.

DATES:

Effective Date: August 19, 2011.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Meredith Murphy, 703-602-1302.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

DoD published a proposed rule at 76 FR 14641 on March 17, 2011, to add a contract clause that clearly identifies any items being purchased that are critical safety items so that the proper risk-based surveillance can be performed. One public comment was received in response to the proposed rule.

II. Discussion and Analysis of the Public Comment

Comment: The respondent noted that the DFARS case specifically addresses aviation and ship critical safety items, but states that protective personal equipment, such as body armor and helmets, can also have catastrophic results if they fail. The respondent asked how DoD ensures that contract administration activities apply increased surveillance procedures in these types of contracts.

Response: The additional risk-based surveillance required for aviation and ship critical safety items is mandated by law (section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 and section 130 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007). There is no equivalent statutory requirement for protective personal equipment, and instituting such a requirement is outside the scope of this case. However, the respondent's comment has been forwarded to the Defense Contract Management Agency for future consideration.

The respondent also asked about the process that ensures that contract administration activities apply increased surveillance procedures when aviation and ship critical safety items have been identified. The process was summarized in the preamble to the proposed rule published at 76 FR 14642 on March 17, 2011. Briefly, the combination of the actions of the design control activities, joint agency instructions (e.g., Management of Aviation Critical Safety Items), limitations on contracting with sources that have not been approved by the design control activity, and focus on contract administration will ensure the proper surveillance for these critical items.

The respondent did not recommend changes to the DFARS text or clause, and the final rule does not revise the DFARS text or clause from that published in the proposed rule.

II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of Defense certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. Its purpose is internal to the Government only by alerting Government quality-assurance activities to existing heightened surveillance requirements that are imposed by DoD requiring activities. The process for identifying an item as a critical safety item occurs entirely outside the acquisition process, as does the process of approving a source for production of a critical safety item. No comments from small entities were received in response to publication of the proposed rule.

V. Paperwork Reduction Act

The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

Start List of Subjects

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 209 and 252

End List of Subjects Start Signature

Ynette R. Shelkin,

Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

End Signature

Therefore, 48 CFR parts 209 and 252 are amended as follows:Start Printed Page 52139

Start Amendment Part

1. The authority citation for

End Amendment Part Start Authority

Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

End Authority Start Part

PART 209—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

End Part Start Amendment Part

2. Add section 209.270-5 to read as follows:

End Amendment Part
Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 252.209-7010, Critical Safety Items, in solicitations and contracts when the acquisition includes one or more items designated by the design control activity as critical safety items.

Start Part

PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

End Part Start Amendment Part

3. Add section 252.209-7010 to read as follows:

End Amendment Part
Critical Safety Items.

As prescribed in 209.270-5, use the following clause:

CRITICAL SAFETY ITEMS (AUG 2011)

(a) Definitions.

Aviation critical safety item means a part, an assembly, installation equipment, launch equipment, recovery equipment, or support equipment for an aircraft or aviation weapon system if the part, assembly, or equipment contains a characteristic any failure, malfunction, or absence of which could cause—

(i) A catastrophic or critical failure resulting in the loss of, or serious damage to, the aircraft or weapon system;

(ii) An unacceptable risk of personal injury or loss of life; or

(iii) An uncommanded engine shutdown that jeopardizes safety.

Design control activity. (i) With respect to an aviation critical safety item, means the systems command of a military department that is specifically responsible for ensuring the airworthiness of an aviation system or equipment, in which an aviation critical safety item is to be used; and

(ii) With respect to a ship critical safety item, means the systems command of a military department that is specifically responsible for ensuring the seaworthiness of a ship or ship equipment, in which a ship critical safety item is to be used.

Ship critical safety item means any ship part, assembly, or support equipment containing a characteristic, the failure, malfunction, or absence of which could cause—

(i) A catastrophic or critical failure resulting in loss of, or serious damage to, the ship; or

(ii) An unacceptable risk of personal injury or loss of life.

(b) Identification of critical safety items. One or more of the items being procured under this contract is an aviation or ship critical safety item. The following items have been designated aviation critical safety items or ship critical safety items by the designated design control activity:

(Insert additional lines as necessary)

(c) Heightened quality assurance surveillance. Items designated in paragraph (b) of this clause are subject to heightened, risk-based surveillance by the designated quality assurance representative.

(End of clause)

End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 2011-20529 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-P