This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
U.S. International Trade Commission.
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 22, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of MyKey Technology Inc. of Gaithersburg, Maryland. Supplements were filed on August 9 and 10, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain computer forensic devices and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,682 (“the `682 patent”); Start Printed Page 53696U.S. Patent No. 7,159,086 (“the `086 patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 7,228,379 (“the `379 patent”). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established under subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complaint requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
The complaint except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-2560.
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on August 23, 2011, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain computer forensic devices and products containing same that infringe one or more of claims 1-8, 11-13, 16-38, and 40-45 of the `682 patent; claims 1-9, 13-18, 20, and 21 of the `086 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the `379 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established under subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: MyKey Technology Inc., 7851 C Beachcraft Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:
Data Protection Solutions by Arco, 3100 North 29th Court, Hollywood, FL 33020.
CRU Acquisitions Group LLC, 1000 SE Tech Center Dr., Suite 160, Vancouver, WA 68683.
CRU-DataPort LLC, 1000 SE Tech Center Dr., Suite 160, Vancouver, WA 68683.
Digital Intelligence, Inc., 17165 W. Glendale Drive, New Berlin, WI 53151.
Diskology, Inc., 9350 Eton Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311.
Guidance Software, Inc., 215 N. Marengo Avenue, Suite 250, Pasadena, CA 91101.
Guidance Tableau LLC, 215 N. Marengo Avenue, Suite 250, Pasadena, CA 91101.
Ji2, Inc., 11235 Knott Ave., Suite C, Cypress, CA 90630.
MultiMedia Effects, Inc., 110 Riviera Dr., Unit 12, Markham, Ontario.
Voom Technologies, Inc., 110 Saint Croix Trail, S. Lakeland, MN 55043.
YEC Co. Ltd., 543-9 Tsuruma, Machida-shi, Tokyo 194-004, Japan.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.Start Signature
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 24, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-21960 Filed 8-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P