Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act” or “Act”), and Rule 19b-4  thereunder, notice is hereby given that on September 22, 2011, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (“CHX” or the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule Start Printed Page 62127change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. The Exchange filed the proposal as a “non-controversial” proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)  thereunder. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
CHX proposes to amend its rules to eliminate certain references to the Exchange acting as the Designated Examining Authority. The text of this proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at (http://www.chx.com) and in the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to delete certain references in its rules to its status as the Designated Examining Authority (“DEA”). In the impacted rules, the DEA references generally act to limit the scope and applicability of those rules to firms for which the Exchange acts as the DEA. While this limitation may be appropriate in some contexts, for example the Rules in Article 7 regarding Financial Responsibility and Reporting Requirements, the Exchange no longer believes that these provisions are appropriate in certain other contexts. The Exchange is therefore submitting this rule proposal to delete certain of those references and make appropriate changes to the remaining provisions.
In Article 6, Rule 5(a), (Supervision of Registered Persons and Branch and Resident Offices), the Exchange proposes to delete the limiting reference to Participants Firms for which the Exchange acts as the DEA. The Exchange proposes that the provisions of Rule 5(a) will apply equally to all Participant Firms.
In Article 17 (Institutional Brokers), Rule 1 (Registration and Appointment) and in Interpretation and Policy .01 of Article 17, Rule 3 (Responsibilities), the Exchange proposes to delete the requirement that Participant Firms seeking to register as an Institutional Broker [sic] must have the Exchange act as the DEA. The Exchange does not believe that it is necessary that the Exchange examine a Participant Firm for its compliance with applicable financial responsibility rules in order that it qualify for status as an Institutional Broker. The Exchange notes that it conducts comprehensive daily surveillance of Institutional Broker trading activity on the CHX and conducts examinations for supervisory and trading-related issues of all CHX-registered Institutional Brokers, irrespective of whether it acts as the DEA. The Exchange also administers a qualification examination for all individuals acting as an Institutional Broker Representative (“IBR”). Only an approved IBR may handle and accept orders from customers of the Institutional Broker firm. Given this oversight structure, the requirement that the CHX act as the DEA for Institutional Brokers in all cases appears superfluous and unnecessarily restrictive.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act in general, and furthers [sic] the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) in particular, in that it is [sic] designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transaction in securities, to remove impediments and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed changes will expand the reach of the Exchange rules in circumstances where it is appropriate and fair to do so, and will eliminate outdated limitations of certain provisions to a subset of Exchange Participants. The broad application of Exchange rules to all Participants should result in the fair and evenhanded application of such rules to Participant firms generally.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments Regarding the Proposed Rule Changes Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Changes and Timing for Commission Action
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)  thereunder, the Exchange has designated this proposal as one that effects a change that: (i) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Rule 19b-4(f)(6)  requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing Start Printed Page 62128of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
Under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) of the Act, a proposal does not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Commission is waiving the 30-day operative period for this filing so that it may become effective and operative upon filing. The Commission believes waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest as the waiver will allow the Exchange to implement the change right away. The proposed rule change eliminates references to DEA which limit the applicability of some rules to firms for which the CHX serves as DEA. These rules will now apply to all member firms.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
- Use the Commission's Internet comment form; (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an e-mail to email@example.com. Please include File No. SR-CHX-2011-27 on the subject line.
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2011-27. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule changes between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CHX. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2011-27 and should be submitted on or before October 27, 2011.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
5. Although not a defined term in our rules, the DEA is the Self-Regulatory Organization (“SRO”) with the responsibility for examining a member for compliance with applicable financial responsibility rules pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17d-1. 17 CFR 240.17d-1.Back to Citation
6. For example, Participants for which the Exchange is the DEA are required by Article 7, Rule 3A to notify the Exchange prior to opening a Joint Back Office arrangement. Similarly, Article 7, Rule 9 requires firms for which the CHX is the DEA to file reports of short positions carried by the firm.Back to Citation
7. Certain existing rules regarding the qualification and examination of individuals associated with a Participant firm contain references to the CHX acting as DEA. The Exchange is proposing to delete those references as part of a separate rule filing making additional changes to those provisions. Current Article 8, Rule 13 (Advertising and Promotion) also contains similar references and the Exchange plans on eliminating those in a subsequent proposal to conform our rules with those of the Financial Industry Regulatory Agency (“FINRA”) in order to make them “common” for purposes of our agreement with FINRA for the allocation of regulatory responsibility of common rules for dual members.Back to Citation
8. The elimination of this requirement does not imply that an Institutional Broker firm will not be examined for compliance with financial responsibility rules. It simply means that another SRO will perform the examination function for those rules.Back to Citation
13. Id.Back to Citation
14. Id.Back to Citation
15. For purposes only of waiving the operative delay of this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). See also 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(59).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 2011-25795 Filed 10-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P