This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-5960 or send an e-mail to email@example.com. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.
Workplace Violence Prevention Programs in NJ Healthcare Facilities—New—National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The long-term goal of the proposed project is to reduce violence against healthcare workers. The objective of the proposed study is two-fold: (1) To examine healthcare facility compliance with the New Jersey Violence Prevention in Health Care Facilities Act, and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of the regulations in this Act in reducing assault injuries to workers. Our central hypothesis is that facilities with high compliance with the regulations will have lower rates of employee violence-related injury. First, we will conduct face-to-face interviews with the chairs of the Violence Prevention Committees who are in charge of overseeing compliance efforts. The purpose of the interviews is to measure compliance to the state regulations (violence prevention policies, reporting systems Start Printed Page 64352for violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and violence prevention training). Second, we will also collect assault injury data from facility violent event reports 3 years pre-regulation (2009-2011) and 3 years post-regulation (2012-2014). The purpose of collecting these data is to evaluate changes in assault injury rates before and after enactment of the regulations. Third, we will conduct a nurse survey. The survey will describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations.
Background and Brief Description
Healthcare workers are nearly five times more likely to be victims of violence than workers in all industries combined 1. While healthcare workers are not at particularly high risk for job-related homicide, nearly 60% of all nonfatal assaults occurring in private industry are experienced in healthcare. Six states have enacted laws to reduce violence against healthcare workers by requiring workplace violence prevention programs 2. However, little is understood about how effective these laws are in reducing violence against healthcare workers.
We will test our central hypothesis by accomplishing the following specific aims:
1. Compare the comprehensiveness of healthcare facility workplace violence prevention programs before and after enactment of the New Jersey regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that enactment of the regulations will improve the comprehensiveness of hospital workplace violence prevention program policies, procedures and training.
2. Describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that nurses receive at least 80% of the workplace violence prevention training components mandated in the New Jersey regulations.
3. Examine patterns of assault injuries to workers before and after enactment of the regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that rates of assault injuries to workers will decrease following enactment of the regulations.
Healthcare facilities falling under the regulations are eligible for study inclusion (i.e., general acute care hospitals and psychiatric facilities). We will conduct face-to-face interviews with the chairs of the Violence Prevention Committees, who as stated in regulations, are in charge of overseeing compliance efforts. These individuals will include hospital administrators, security directors and/or risk managers, many of whom participated in the California study. The purpose of the interviews is to measure compliance to the state regulations (Aim 1). The interview form was pilot-tested by the study team in the Fall 2010 and includes the following components as mandated in the regulations: violence prevention policies, reporting systems for violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and violence prevention training. Questions will also be asked about barriers and facilitators to developing the violence prevention program. These data will be collected in the post-regulation time period; data collected from New Jersey hospitals in the California study will be used as the baseline measure for evaluating compliance.
We will also collect assault injury data from facility violent event reports 3 years pre-regulation (2009-2011) and 3 years post-regulation (2012-2014). The purpose of collecting these data is to evaluate changes in assault injury rates before and after enactment of the regulations (Aim 3). The abstraction form was developed to collect the specific reporting components stated in the regulations: date, time and location of the incident; identity, job title and job task of the victim; identity of the perpetrator; description of the violent act, including whether a weapon was used; description of physical injuries; number of employees in the vicinity when the incident occurred, and their actions in response to the incident; recommendations of police advisors, employees or consultants, and; actions taken by the facility in response to the incident. No employee or perpetrator identifiable information will be collected.
In addition to health care facilities, nurses will also be recruited. These nurses will be recruited from a mailing list of nurses licensed from the State of New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs Board of Nursing. The mailing list was selected as the population source of workers due to the ability to capture all licensed nurses in New Jersey. A similar listing does not exist for non-licensed frontline workers, such as aides and orderlies. Therefore, a sampling frame based on nurses (registered nurses and licensed practical nurses) will be used to select workers to participate in the study. A random sample of 2000 registered and licensed practical nurses will be recruited for study participation. A third-party contractor will be responsible for sending the survey to the random sample of 2000. The Health Professionals and Allied Employees union will promote the survey to their members. To maintain the worker's anonymity, the facility in which he/she works will not be identified. The survey will describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations (Aim 2).
There are no costs to the respondents other than their time. The total estimated annual burden hours are 817.
|Type of respondent||Form name||No. of respondents||Responses per respondent||Average burden per response (in hrs)|
|Hospital Administrators||Evaluation of Hospital Workplace Violence Prevention Program||50||1||1|
|Hospital Administrators||Committee Chair Interview||50||1||1|
|Hospital Administrators||Employee Incident Information||50||1||1|
|Nurses (RN and LPN)||Healthcare Facility Workplace Violence Prevention Programs Nurse Survey||2000||1||20/60|
Dated: October 12, 2011.
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-26929 Filed 10-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P