Skip to Content


Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Obvious and Catastrophic Error Rule

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document including its time on Public Inspection. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Enhanced Content

Relevant information about this document from provides additional context. This information is not part of the official Federal Register document.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble January 18, 2013.

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”),[1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] notice is hereby given that on January 8, 2013, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the “Exchange” or the “ISE”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange proposes to amend ISE Rule 720, Obvious and Catastrophic Errors, to address obvious and catastrophic errors involving complex orders. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose

The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend ISE Rule 720 regarding Obvious and Catastrophic Errors to mitigate the risk to parties using complex orders, where part or all of a complex order traded at an erroneous price. Specifically, this proposed rule change addresses situations where one component (or leg) of a complex order is deemed an obvious (or catastrophic) error but the other component(s) is (are) not.

Complex orders are orders involving the simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more different options series in the same underlying security, for the same account, in a ratio that is equal to or greater than one-to-three (.333) and less than or equal to three-to-one (3.00) and for the purpose of executing a particular investment strategy.[3] With this proposed rule change, the Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 720 to Start Printed Page 5526address complex orders that have at least one leg that trades at an erroneous price. Rule 720 is the Exchange's rule that governs obvious and catastrophic errors in options. Most options exchanges have similar but not identical rules; this proposal would adopt a new process of determining how to deal with obvious/catastrophic errors when a complex order trades with another complex order on the Exchange.

Rule 720 provides a framework for reviewing the price of a transaction to determine whether that price was an “obvious error” [4] pursuant to objective standards. When a Member believes it received one or more executions at an erroneous price, that Member may notify designated members of the Exchange's market control center (“Market Control”) within the prescribed timeframe so Market Control can determine whether the Member participated in a transaction that was the result of an obvious or catastrophic error.[5] Such an error will be deemed to have occurred when the execution price of a transaction is higher or lower than the theoretical price for a series by a certain amount depending on the type of option. Market Control use one of two criteria when determining the theoretical price of an options execution, which is enumerated in ISE Rule 720(a)(3). The theoretical price is then compared to an obvious/catastrophic error chart within Rule 720(a). If the transaction price meets this threshold, the transaction may be adjusted or nullified.

This proposed rule change would permit all legs of a complex order execution to be nullified when one leg can be nullified under Rule 720, only if the execution was a complex order versus a complex order.[6] This occurs when a complex order executes against another complex order. For example, assume a customer trades a call spread at a net price of $0.50 by buying the January 50 calls at $3.00 and selling the January 55 calls at $2.50. If the January 50 calls should have been trading at $7.00 and thus meet the obvious error threshold in Rule 720, then the entire complex trade will be nullified only if the January 50 and 55 calls traded as a complex order against another complex order, rather than as two separate trades. Currently, once the trade involving the January 50 calls is nullified, both parties are stuck with a transaction in the January 55 calls, which was not intended by either. This proposed rule change, therefore, provides an important benefit to both parties of a complex order, i.e., nullification of all the components of a complex order that traded with another complex order, because neither party intended to end up with just one component of a complex order. With this proposed rule change, a complex order execution where part or all of a complex order traded at an erroneous price would be nullified, not adjusted. The Exchange believes that if any one leg of a complex order is adjusted to a price other than its stated price, the trade no longer serves its purpose because complex orders are intended to serve a particular trading strategy but only if the order is executed at its stated price.

This proposal does not address complex orders that do not trade against other complex orders. This proposal is intended to mitigate risk for parties of a complex order where a complex order traded with another complex order at an erroneous price. By creating uniformity for all trades that are “complex to complex,” parties will have less trading risk because all of the components will be nullified under this proposed rule change.

The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is reasonable and objective, and would serve to enhance the application of the Exchange's Obvious and Catastrophic Error rule by extending it to erroneous executions in complex orders. The purpose of this proposed rule change is to align the Exchange's rule with rules currently in place at other exchanges that address erroneous executions in complex orders.[7] The proposed rule change will provide members with similar opportunities for trade nullification that are available on PHLX which also has a rule in place to address obvious and catastrophic errors involving executions in complex orders.

2. Basis

The Exchange believes that this proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [8] in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act [9] in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and in general, to protect investors and the public interest.

The Exchange understands that, in approving proposals related to adjusting and nullifying option trades involving obvious and catastrophic errors, the Commission has focused on the need for specificity and objectivity with respect to exchange determinations and processes for reviewing such determinations.[10] In this regard, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change provides specific and objective procedures for determining whether a trade should be nullified. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will improve the obvious error process for complex orders that trade with another complex order. Recognition that a trade is part of a complex order should help add more certainty to the obvious/catastrophic error process and reduce the risk to parties trading complex orders on the Exchange because neither party to a complex order expects or intends to end up with just a piece of a complex order.

The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change would benefit investors and market participants that are members of multiple exchanges by more closely aligning the Exchange's rules with respect to obvious and catastrophic errors involving executions in complex orders with those of other exchanges. In this respect, the proposed rule change helps foster certainty for market participants trading on multiple exchanges. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the increased specificity resulting from the proposed rule change, combined with the continued objective nature of the Exchange's process for rendering and reviewing trade nullification determinations, is consistent with prior guidance from the Commission, is consistent with the Exchange Act and is consistent with the maintenance of a fair and orderly market and the protection of investors and the public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, but rather this proposal will promote competition as it is designed to improve the treatment of complex orders where part or all of a complex order is traded at an erroneous price.Start Printed Page 5527

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) [11] of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) [12] thereunder. The Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing the proposed rule change.

The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because this rule will offer Exchange members the same potential for relief that is available at other options exchanges for certain obvious and catastrophic errors involving complex orders. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative upon filing.[13]

At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

Paper Comments

  • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-04. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (​rules/​sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-04, and should be submitted on or before February 15, 2013.

Start Signature

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[14]

Kevin M. O'Neill,

Deputy Secretary.

End Signature End Preamble


3.  See ISE Rule 722(a)(1).

Back to Citation

4.  This proposed rule change also covers catastrophic errors.

Back to Citation

5.  See, ISE Rules 720(b)(1) and 720(d)(1).

Back to Citation

6.  See, proposed ISE Rule 720, Supplementary Material .06.

Back to Citation

7.  See, for example, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (“PHLX”) Rule 1092(c)(v).

Back to Citation

10.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54228 (July 27, 2006), 71 FR 44066 (August 3, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-14).

Back to Citation

13.  For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2013-01487 Filed 1-24-13; 8:45 am]