This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
You may be interested in this newer document that published on 12/07/2015 with action 'Notice of request for an extension of an information collection requirement for an existing OMB clearance.'
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
35
as of
10/15/2026 at 12:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2013-03558 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
02/14/2013 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2013-03558 (78 FR 11188)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA.
ACTION:
Notice of request for an extension of a information collection requirement for an existing OMB clearance.
SUMMARY:
Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a previously approved information collection requirement regarding the packing list clause. A notice was published in the
Federal Register
at 77 FR 66466, on November 5, 2012. One respondent submitted comments.
DATES:
Submit comments on or before: March 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Submit comments identified by Information Collection 3090-0246, Packing List Clause, by any of the following methods:
Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the OMB control number. Select the link “Submit a Comment” that corresponds with “Information Collection 3090-0246, Packing List Clause”. Follow the instructions provided at the “Submit a Comment” screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and “Information Collection 3090-0246, Packing List Clause” on your attached document.
Fax:
202-501-4067.
Mail:
General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada Flowers/IC 3090-0246, Packing List Clause.
Instructions:
Please submit comments only and cite Information Collection 3090-0246, Packing List Clause, in all correspondence related to this collection. All comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Eble, Procurement Analyst, GSA Policy Integrity Workforce, by telephone (215) 446-5823 or via email at
Deborah.eble@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
GSAR clause 552.211-77, Packing List, requires a contractor to include a packing list or other suitable document that verifies placement of an order and identifies the items shipped. In addition to information contractors would normally include on packing lists, the identification of cardholder name, telephone number and the term “Credit Card” is required.
B. Discussion and Analysis
One respondent submitted comments on the extension of the previously approved information collection,
( printed page 11189)
specifically questioning the government's calculation of the public burden.
Comment:
The respondent commented that the extension of the information collection would violate the fundamental purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act because of the burden it puts on the entity submitting the information and the agency collecting the information. The respondent opposes granting the extension of the information collection requirement.
Response:
In accordance with the Paperwork Act (PRA), agencies can request OMB approval of an existing information collection. The PRA requires that agencies use the
Federal Register
notice and comment process to extend the OMB's approval every three years. This extension to a previously approved information collection pertains to the provision at GSAR 552.211-77, Packing List, which requires contractors to include a packing list that verifies the placement of the order and identifies the items shipped, a normal commercial practice. In addition to the information contractors would normally include on packing lists, the government requires identification of the name of the government credit cardholder, telephone number and the term “Credit Card” on the packing list in supply contracts.
The purpose of the information collection is to facilitate administration of government credit card purchases. Often the government credit cardholder is different from the consignee receiving shipment of the supplies. Providing the additional information ensures the recipient of the packing list, the consignee, notifies the government credit cardholder that the shipment has been received. Once the notification of successful shipment has been received, the cardholder can then authorize payment. This feedback is essential for the cardholder to reconcile his/her monthly statements. This is especially important if the micropurchase threshold is raised to support a contingency operation declaration under FAR subpart 18.2. Not granting this extension would increase costs to the Government during the reconciliation process and may delay payments to contractors for shipments of supplies received.
Comment:
The respondent challenged the estimates used by the agency to calculate the public burden, stating that the burden was insufficient and inadequate to reflect the actual total burden. Specifically, the respondent noted that it was unclear as to how the estimated 4,000 information collection respondents were derived and the estimated number of packing lists in a given year. Therefore, the respondent stated the agency should utilize actual data from the last fiscal year or an estimate of the last three to five fiscal years, reassess the estimated burden, and revise it upwards to be more accurate as was done in FAR Case 2007-006. The respondent also found the “less than one minute per response estimate” to be unrealistically low stating the burden requires creating the packing list.
Response:
Serious consideration is given during the open comment period to all comments received and adjustments are made to the paperwork burden estimate when necessary. The burden is prepared taking into consideration the necessary criteria in OMB guidance for estimating the paperwork burden put on the entity submitting the information. Consideration is given to an entity in reviewing the instruction; using technology to collect, process and disclose information; adjusting existing practices to comply with requirements; searching data sources; completing and reviewing the response and transmitting or disclosing information. Estimated burden hours only include those actions that exceed those a company would take in the normal course of business.
Careful consideration went into assessing the burden for this collection. Packing lists accompanying shipments of supplies are customary in the normal course of business, including the information listed in paragraph (a) of clause 552.211-77. The public burden is limited to the annotation on the packing list the name and telephone number of the government credit cardholder and the phrase “Credit Card.”
While there is no centralized database for the collection of the packing lists in a fiscal year, the agency found the respondent's suggestion to use actual data reasonable to calculate the public burden. The annual reporting burden was revised, using actual data from the government-wide Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012. Two types of actions were analyzed: GSA actions for supplies where the method of payment was made by government credit card; and, non-GSA actions for supplies where both payment was by a government credit card and a GSA indefinite delivery contract for supplies was referenced. Average costs were derived in order for the government to estimate the number of packing slips per order. Thus, an adjustment is made to the annual reporting burden after review of the methodology for computing the number of respondents and packing lists in a given year and the estimated hours per response.
The government agreed with the respondent that the time per response did not allow for review and transmission of the government credit cardholder's name and telephone number and the phrase “Credit Card” into its packing list system and adjusted the burden accordingly.
Members of the public may submit comments for further consideration and are encouraged to provide data to support their request for an adjustment.
C. Annual Reporting Burdens
Respondents:
9,919.
Responses per Respondent:
13.
Hours per Response:.05.
Total Burden Hours:
6447.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the information collection documents from the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417, telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 3090-0246, Packing List Clause, in all correspondence.
Dated: February 8, 2013.
Joseph A Neurauter,
Director, Office of Acquisition Policy, Senior Procurement Executive.