Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
The Department of Commerce (“the Department”) has received Start Printed Page 25419requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with March anniversary dates. In accordance with the Department's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews.
Effective Date: May 1, 2013.
Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Unit, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735.
End Further Info
Start Supplemental Information
The Department has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with March anniversary dates.
All deadlines for the submission of various types of information, certifications, or comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting time.
Notice of No Sales
If a producer or exporter named in this notice of initiation had no exports, sales, or entries during the period of review (“POR”), it must notify the Department within 60 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. All submissions must be filed electronically at http://iaaccess.trade.gov in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). Such submissions are subject to verification in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“Act”). Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request.
In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) data for U.S. imports during the POR. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (“APO”) to all parties having an APO within seven days of publication of this initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the applicable review.
In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be “collapsed” (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis.
In proceedings involving non-market economy (“NME”) countries, the Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies within the country are subject to government control and, thus, should be assigned a single antidumping duty deposit rate. It is the Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to an administrative review in an NME country this single rate unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to be entitled to a separate rate.
To establish whether a firm is sufficiently independent from government control of its export activities to be entitled to a separate rate, the Department analyzes each entity exporting the subject merchandise under a test arising from the Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sparklers From the People's Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 (May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide From the People's Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 (May 2, 1994). In accordance with the separate rates criteria, the Department assigns separate rates to companies in NME cases only if respondents can demonstrate the absence of both de jure and de facto government control over export activities.
All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below. For these administrative reviews, in order to demonstrate separate rate Start Printed Page 25420eligibility, the Department requires entities for whom a review was requested, that were assigned a separate rate in the most recent segment of this proceeding in which they participated, to certify that they continue to meet the criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The Separate Rate Certification form will be available on the Department's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the certification, please follow the “Instructions for Filing the Certification” in the Separate Rate Certification. Separate Rate Certifications are due to the Department no later than 60 calendar days after publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Certification applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers who purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States.
Entities that currently do not have a separate rate from a completed segment of the proceeding 
should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. In addition, companies that received a separate rate in a completed segment of the proceeding that have subsequently made changes, including, but not limited to, changes to corporate structure, acquisitions of new companies or facilities, or changes to their official company name,
should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. The Separate Rate Status Application will be available on the Department's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the Separate Rate Status Application, refer to the instructions contained in the application. Separate Rate Status Applications are due to the Department no later than 60 calendar days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Separate Rate Status Application applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers that purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States.
For exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate status application or certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents.
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating administrative reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these reviews not later than March 31, 2014.
| ||Period to be reviewed|
|Antidumping Duty Proceedings|
|FRANCE: Brass Sheet and Strip, A-427-602||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|KME France (previously known as Trefimetaux)|
|GERMANY: Brass Sheet and Strip, A-428-602||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|Aurubis Stolberg GmbH & Co. KG|
|Carl Schreiber GmbH|
|KME Germany AG & Co. KG|
|Messingwerk Plettenberg Herfeld GmbH & Co. KG|
|MKM Mansfelder Kupfer & Messing GmbH|
|Schlenk Metallfolien GmbH & Co. KG|
|Schwermetall Halbzeugwerk GmbH & Co. KG|
|Sundwiger Messingwerke GmbH & Co. KG|
|ThyssenKrupp VDM GmbH|
|INDIA: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp,3 A-533-840||2/1/12-1/31/13|
|Devi Sea Foods Limited 4|
|ITALY: Brass Sheet and Strip, A-475-601||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|KME Italy SpA|
|SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp,5 6 A-552-802||2/1/12-1/31/13|
|Gallant Dachan Seafood Co., Ltd.|
|SPAIN: Stainless Steel Bar, A-469-805||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|Gerdau Aceros E-speciales Europa, S.L.|
|TAIWAN: Polvinyl Alcohol, A-583-841||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|Chang Chun Petrochemical Co., Ltd.|
|THAILAND: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes, A-549-502||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|Pacific Pipe Public Company Limited|
|Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd.|
|THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Glycine,7 A-570-836||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|A&A Pharmachem Inc.|
|AICO Laboratories India Ltd.|
|Amol Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.|
|Aqua Bond Inc.|
|Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd.|
|Beijing Onlystar Technology Co., Ltd.|
|Chiyuen International Trading Ltd.|
|Start Printed Page 25421|
|China Jiangsu International Economic Technical Cooperation Corporation|
|E-Heng Import and Export Co., Ltd.|
|Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.|
|FarmaSino Pharmaceuticals (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.|
|General Ingredient Inc.|
|Gulbrandsen Technologies (India)|
|Gurvey & Berry Co.|
|Hebei Donghua Jiheng Fine Chemical Co., Ltd.|
|H.T. Griffin Food Ingredients|
|Hong Kong United Biochemistry Co. Ltd.|
|Jiangsu Dongchang Chemical|
|Jiangxi Ansun Chemical Technology|
|Jiangyin Trust International Inc.|
|Jizhou City Huayang Chemical Co., Ltd.|
|Kissner Milling Co. Ltd.|
|NALCO Canada Co.|
|Ningbo Create-Bio Engineering Co. Ltd.|
|Ningbo Generic Chemical Co.|
|Qingdao Samin Chemical Co., Ltd.|
|Paras Intermediates Pvt. Ltd.|
|Salvi Chemical Industries|
|Shanpar Industries Pvt. Ltd.|
|Showa Denko K.K.|
|Shijiazhuang Jackchem Co., Ltd.|
|Shijiazhuang Zexing Amino Acid Co.|
|Tianjin Garments Import & Export|
|Tianjin Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Company|
|Tianjin Tianen Enterprise Co. Ltd.|
|Tywoon Development (China) Co., Ltd.|
|Unipex Solutions Canada Inc.|
|XPAC Technologies Inc.|
|Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd.|
|THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Tissue Paper Products,8 A-570-894||3/1/12-2/28/13|
|AR Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd.|
|LF Products Pte. Ltd.|
|Stone Sapphire (HK) Limited|
|Countervailing Duty Proceedings|
|INDIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products,9 C-533-821||1/1/12-12/31/12|
|TURKEY: Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube, C-489-502||1/1/12-12/31/12|
|Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.|
|Borusan Holding A.S.|
|Borusan Lojistik Dagitim Pepolama Tasimacilik ye Tic A.S.|
|Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S.|
|ERBOSAN Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.|
|Guven Steel Pipe (also known as Guven celik Born San. Ve Tic. Ltd.)|
|Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustisi A.S.|
|Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S.|
|Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S.|
|Umran Celik Born Sanayii A.S.|
|Yucel Boru ye Profil Endustrisi A.S,|
|Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ye Pazarlama A.S.|
|Cayirova Born Sanayi ye Ticaret A.S. (“Yucel Group”)|
|3 In the initiation notice for certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India and Thailand, the Department inadvertently omitted one company requested for review of the antidumping duty order on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India. Specifically, the timely review request for Devi Sea Foods Limited (Devi) was not included in the April 2, 2013, initiation notice. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India and Thailand: Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, 78 FR 19639 (April 2, 2013). This company is included herein as a correction to the April 2, 2013, initiation notice.|
|4 Shrimp produced and exported by Devi was excluded from the order effective February 1, 2009. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, and Notice of Revocation of Order in Part, 75 FR 41813, 41814 (July 19, 2010). However, shrimp produced by other manufacturers and exported by Devi, as well as shrimp produced by Devi and exported by other exporters remains subject to the order. Thus, this administrative review with respect to Devi covers only entries of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India where Devi acted as either the manufacturer or exporter (but not both).|
|5 In the initiation notice covering cases with February anniversary dates, the Department inadvertently omitted one company requested for review of the antidumping duty order on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (“Vietnam”). Specifically, the timely review request for Gallant Dachan Seafood Co., Ltd. was not included in the March 29, 2013, initiation notice. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 19197 (March 29, 2013). This company is included herein as a correction to the March 29, 2013, initiation notice.|
|6 If one of the above-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Vietnam who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single People's Republic of China (“PRC”) entity of which the named exporters are a part.Start Printed Page 25422|
|7 If one of the above-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Glycine from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.|
|8 If one of the above-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Tissue Paper Products from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.|
|9 In the initiation notice covering cases with December anniversary dates, the Department inadvertently included Tata Steel Limited in the initiation of the review of the countervailing duty order on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 6291 (January 30, 2012). We are not initiating a review with respect to Tata Steel Limited. This is a correction to the January 30, 2012, initiation notice.|
During any administrative review covering all or part of a period falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of the publication of an antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or suspended investigation (after sunset review), the Secretary, if requested by a domestic interested party within 30 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 2002), as appropriate, whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested.
For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures “gap” period, of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR.
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Those procedures apply to administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that the meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)).
Any party submitting factual information in an antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. See section 782(b) of the Act. Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/government officials as well as their representatives in all segments of any antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceedings initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See Certification of Factual Information to Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 7491 (February 10, 2011) (“Interim Final Rule”), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) and (2). The formats for the revised certifications are provided at the end of the Interim Final Rule. The Department intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments initiated on or after March 14, 2011 if the submitting party does not comply with the revised certification requirements.
These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).
End Supplemental Information
Dated: April 25, 2013.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-10299 Filed 4-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P