May 30, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”),
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on May 21, 2013 NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (“Phlx” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Permit Fee and certain Options Trading Floor Fees, including a technical amendment to the Pricing Schedule.
While changes to the Pricing Schedule pursuant to this proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the proposed amendment to be operative on June 3, 2013.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange, on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to increase the Permit Fee in Section VI, entitled “Membership Fees” at Part A entitled “Permit and Registration Fees” of the Pricing Schedule to recoup costs associated with the administration of the Exchange's members. The Exchange also proposes to amend Section VII entitled “Other Member Fees” at Part A entitled “Options Trading Floor Fees” of the Pricing Schedule to eliminate the Trading/Administrative Booths Fee and the Specialist Post Fee and increase the Floor Facility Fees. The Exchange believes that the increases are necessary to keep pace with escalating technology costs, costs of certain floor-related charges due to a rise in occupancy expenses and rising overhead costs associated with maintaining the trading floor.
The Exchange also proposes to make a technical amendment to the Pricing Schedule to eliminate certain unnecessary text in Chapter VI, Part A.
The Exchange assesses two different Permit Fees based on whether a member or member organization is transacting business on the Exchange. The Exchange assesses members and member organizations that are transacting business on the Exchange a Permit Fee of $2,100 per month. A member or member organization will be assessed the $2,100 monthly Permit Fee if that member or member organization: (1) Transacts its option orders in its assigned Phlx house account in a particular month; or (2) is a clearing member of The Options Clearing Corporation or a Floor Broker; or (3) for those member organizations which are under common ownership, transacts at least one options trade in a Phlx house account that is assigned to one of the member organizations under common ownership.
The Exchange assesses members and member organizations that are not transacting business on the Exchange a Permit Fee of $7,500 per month. A member or member organization is assessed the $7,500 Permit Fee for not transacting business on the Exchange if that member is either: (i) not a PSX Only Participant; 
or (ii) not engaged in an options business at Phlx in a particular month. In addition, a member or member organization that sponsors an options participant 
would pay an additional Permit Fee for each sponsored options participant.
The Exchange is proposing to increase the $2,100 Permit Fee for members transacting business on the Exchange to $2,150 per month. The Exchange is seeking to recoup costs incurred from the membership administration function. The Exchange is not amending the Permit Fee for members who are not transacting business on the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to make corresponding amendments to Section VI, Part A where the permit fee is referenced.
Other Member Fees
The Exchange proposes to eliminate the Trading/Administrative Booths fee of $300 per month fee paid by floor brokers and clearing firms 
and the Specialist Post Fee of $3,000 per month paid by Specialist units. The Trading/Administrative Booth space is physical space on the Exchange's trading floor, which space typically is used by floor brokers. The Specialist Post is physical space on the Exchange's trading floor which is used by Specialist units. The Exchange proposes to amend the Floor Facility fee to cover the costs of operating the trading floor.
The Exchange proposes to increase the Floor Facility fee from $300 to $330 per month. Today, the Floor Facility fee is applicable to Registered Options Start Printed Page 33874Traders,
individual Specialists 
The Floor Facility fee was intended to fairly allocate costs attendant to providing members with services necessary to the conduct of business on the floor of the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to assess the proposed increased Floor Facility fee to Clerks,
excluding Inactive Nominees,
and Floor Brokers in addition to ROTs (including SQTs) and individual Specialists. The Exchange proposes to increase this fee to offset the increased costs of operating a trading floor facility and the elimination of the Trading/Administrative Booths fee and the Specialist Post fee.
The Exchange proposes to amend certain unnecessary language in Chapter VI, Section A that was recently added to the Pricing Schedule to provide a temporary waiver of the Application and Initiation Fees for current Remote Streaming Quote Trader Organizations.
The Exchange implemented the waiver for the time period from April 24, 2013 to May 13, 2013.
At this time, the Exchange proposes to remove this text from the Pricing Schedule as it is unnecessary.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 
in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 
in particular, in that it provides for an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its facilities.
The Exchange believes that the proposed increase to the Permit Fee for members transacting business on the Exchange is reasonable because the Exchange is seeking to recoup costs related to membership administration. The proposed fee is in the range of similar fees at other exchanges and less than other fees.
In addition, the Exchange believes that the Permit Fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory, because unlike other exchanges, Phlx's Permit Fees are the same for every options permit holder that is conducting business at the Exchange. The Exchange also believes that the increased fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Permit Fee for not transacting business on the Exchange remains substantially higher as is the case today.
Other Member Fees
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to eliminate the Trading/Administrative Booths fee and Specialist Post fee because the Exchange believes those fees no longer adequately cover the costs of operating the trading floor. In addition, the Exchange is seeking to encourage members and member organization to utilize and expand use of the space available on its trading floor. The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to eliminate the Trading/Administrative Booths fee and Specialist Post fee because no market participant would be assessed these fees.
The Exchange believes that increasing the Floor Facility fee is reasonable because the fee offsets the increased costs of operating a trading floor facility. The increases are necessary to keep pace with technology costs, costs of certain floor-related charges due to a rise in occupancy expenses and rising overhead costs associated with maintaining the trading floor. Further, the proposed modifications to the Floor Facility fee, coupled with the elimination of the Trading/Administrative Booths fee and the Specialist Post fee better recoups the costs of operating a trading floor.
The Exchange believes that increasing the Floor Facility Fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the fee will be applied uniformly to all members and their respective staff, who operate routinely from the floor of the Exchange. The Exchange believes this fee is indicative of the costs attributable to these categories of floor participants and therefore the fee is being equitable assessed and is not unfairly discriminatory.
The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to assess Clerks the Floor Facility Fee in addition to the other market participants as discussed above. Clerks are registered on-floor personnel that utilize the Exchange's services and are responsible for the rise in technology and other overheard costs. Inactive Nominees are considered a Clerk, but also pay additional fees associated with being an Inactive Nominee 
and do not routinely utilize Start Printed Page 33875the floor in the manner as other Clerks supporting member's day-to-day operations. The Exchange today assesses floor brokers the Trading/Administrative Booths fee, this fee of $300 per month is being eliminated and instead floor brokers would pay the $330 per month proposed Floor Facility fee. While this results in an increased cost of $300 per month for Floor Brokers, the Exchange believes that the fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because as mentioned above, floor brokers utilize the facilities of the Exchange as do Clerks, individuals Specialists and ROTs. In addition, the Exchange anticipates that most floor brokers will experience an overall reduction in costs due to the elimination of the Trading/Administrative Booths fee. The Exchange's proposal to distribute the cost to each of these market participants applies the fee to the recipients who consume the services offered at the Exchange to conduct trading on the floor. The elimination of the Specialist Post fee will result in the elimination of a $3,000 per month charge for Specialist units. The individual Specialists are assessed the Floor Facility fee today and would experience the increase of $30 per month.
The Exchange's proposal to remove text in Chapter VI, Section A related to a waiver of the Application and Initiation Fees for current RSQTOs for the time period from April 24, 2013 to May 13, 2013 is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the rule text is unnecessary and inapplicable to any market participant at this time.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange is proposing to increase the Permit Fees which are applicable to members and member organizations transacting business on the Exchange. The increase is attributable to a rise in costs at the Exchange and is assessed to those members and member organizations that are currently transacting business on Phlx. The increase narrows the gap between permit holders transacting business on the Exchange and those members that are not transacting business on the Exchange. This fee does not impose an undue burden on competition.
The Exchange's proposal to eliminate the Trading/Administrative Booths Fee because those booths no longer exist does not impose an undue burden on competition because the Exchange would not assess this fee to any market participant. Increasing the Floor Facility Fees and allocating that fee to Clerks and Floor Brokers does not create an undue burden on competition because the Exchange is allocating its costs among those market participants that benefit from the Exchange's services. The Exchange is also eliminating the Trading/Administrative Booths Fee that is borne today by floor brokers and clearing firms.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market, comprised of eleven exchanges, in which market participants can easily and readily direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. Accordingly, the fees that are assessed by the Exchange described in the above proposal are influenced by these robust market forces and therefore must remain competitive with fees charged by other venues and therefore must continue to be reasonable and equitably allocated to those members that opt to direct orders to the Exchange rather than competing venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2013-58. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2013-58 and should be submitted on or before June 26, 2013.
Start Printed Page 33876
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
[FR Doc. 2013-13275 Filed 6-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P