United States International Trade Commission.
The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (“PET” film) from India and the antidumping duty orders on PET film from India and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Start Printed Page 42106
Effective Date: July 5, 2013.
Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Szustakowski (202-205-3169), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
End Further Info
Start Supplemental Information
On July 5, 2013, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (78 F.R. 19524, April 2, 2013) to be adequate and that the respondent interested party group response with respect to Taiwan was adequate and decided to conduct a full review with respect to the antidumping duty order concerning PET film from Taiwan. The Commission found that the respondent interested party group response with respect to the reviews on the orders on PET film from India was inadequate. However, the Commission determined to conduct full reviews concerning the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on PET film from India to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision to conduct a full review with respect to the order on PET film from Taiwan. A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.
End Supplemental Information
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 10, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-16869 Filed 7-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P