This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 07/19/2013 at 08:45 am.
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA), Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) is amending the regulations that cover the official grain inspection and weighing service procedures that GIPSA's Federal Grain Inspection Service (FGIS) performs under the authority of the United States Grain Standards Act (USGSA), as amended. Specifically, GIPSA is amending the regulations issued under the USGSA pertaining to grain exported in large reusable containers typically loaded onto export ships. In this final rule, GIPSA will add new definitions for “composite” and “average” grades, limit the number of containers that may be averaged or combined to form a single lot, restrict the inspection and weighing of container lots to the official service provider's area of responsibility, specify a 60-day retention period for file samples representing such container lots, make consistent the weighing certification procedures for container lots with those for inspection certification procedures, and make other miscellaneous changes. GIPSA believes that these revisions will help facilitate the marketing of U.S. grain shipped for export.
Effective September 20, 2013.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Lijewski, Director, USDA, GIPSA, Field Management Division, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 2409-S, Washington, DC 20250-3630, phone (202) 720-0224.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The United States Grain Standards Act (USGSA) (7 U.S.C. 71-87k), as amended, provides an official inspection system that facilitates the marketing of grain in domestic and international markets. The Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) is authorized by the USGSA to establish standards of kind, class, quality, and condition for various grains and to establish standards or procedures for accurate weighing and weight certification and controls, including safeguards over equipment calibration and maintenance, for grain shipped in interstate or foreign commerce. Additionally, the Secretary can amend or revoke these standards or procedures as needed in order to adjust to current industry needs and practices. Under authority delegated by the Secretary, GIPSA is authorized to establish and maintain regulations that cover the inspection and weighing of grain under the USGSA.
Grain exported in large reusable containers has grown considerably in the past 5 years to levels that GIPSA believes have far exceeded grain industry expectations. Increased exports of containerized grain have, in turn, increased the demand for USDA grain inspection services provided by FGIS and its official grain export service providers. While the overall market share for U.S. export grain shipped in large reusable containers has grown rapidly, USGSA regulations (7 CFR part 800) for export grain shipments have focused primarily on the inspection and grading of grain exported in shiplots, unit trains, and lash barges—not on grain exported in multiple large reusable containers that are considered collectively as a single lot.
The last amendments to these sections of the USGSA regulations occurred in 1980 (45 FR 15810) when grain was not typically exported in large reusable containers but was exported in ships, Start Printed Page 43754unit trains, and lash barges. In recent years, however, demand has increased for grain that is exported in large reusable containers, which enables buyers and sellers to negotiate contract terms that specify the exact quantity and quality of grain to be delivered. Typically, the industry uses large reusable containers that may be 20 feet or 40 feet in length, 8′0″ or 8′6″ in width, and 8′6″ or 9′6″ in height to transport bulk or sacked grain. Large reusable containers are usually a metal truck/trailer body that can be detached from the chassis for loading into a vessel, a railcar, or stacked in a container depot. Sales contracts usually cover multiple container parcels known as “bookings” (i.e., grain in multiple large reusable containers that may be from different sources but are sold under a single sales contract and a single certificate) that are shipped to multiple end users, but collectively are considered a single lot. Unless exempted from official inspection and weighing requirements, a sales contract must stipulate that the overall quality in a booking meets an official USDA grade standard. Accordingly, export grain sellers often request that GIPSA combine inspection results from the individual containers and issue one official inspection certificate for the booking.
In the July 18, 2011 Federal Register (76 FR 42067), GIPSA requested comments to a proposed rule which proposed amendments to the regulations. GIPSA received comments from 10 stakeholders during the 60-day comment period, which fall into four general categories.
Discussion of Comments and Final Action
Commenters urged GIPSA to establish a larger maximum single lot size greater than the proposed size of 20 large reusable containers for average grade analysis or composite grade analysis. Four commenters urged GIPSA to establish a single lot size of 50 large reusable containers, while two commenters requested GIPSA to establish a single lot size of 60 large reusable containers. GIPSA also received three comments requesting that a maximum single lot size of 1,500 metric tons be adopted. Commenters also stated that the proposed regulations were disadvantageous to the shipper because they would increase delivery time as well as costs and make it more difficult to meet the contract grade. GIPSA considers 20 large reusable containers as equivalent in volume to the other types of land carriers (e.g. five railcars and 15 trucks) currently combined or averaged to achieve a single grade according to written instructions. Further, GIPSA believes that a maximum of 20 large reusable containers would ensure quality and uniformity within each single lot of grain that is inspected. Therefore, GIPSA is making no change to the final rule based on the above comments.
GIPSA received comments from ten commenters representing a broad cross section of grain exporters and the containerized shipping industry regarding the proposed reasonably continuous loading requirement. GIPSA did not receive any comments from international importers of containerized grain shipments in response to the proposed rule. Five commenters questioned the selection of 88 hours and suggested a longer limitation, two commenters stated that the market should and does control the timeliness of loading, two commenters requested clarification of the proposed rule, and one commenter said the rule would impose excessive costs and make it more difficult for shippers to meet contracted quality requirements.
The proposed requirement that the loading of grain in single lots be done in a reasonably continuous operation imposes a limit of 88 hours on the amount of down time that can occur while a lot is being loaded. The term “reasonably continuous operation “is defined in current regulations (7 CFR 800.0). The applicability of 88 hours of down time follows established time limits already in the USGSA regulations for shiplots, unit trains, and lash barges. This final rule allows for breaks in loading the lot at the particular location for up to 88 hours. Furthermore, this requirement does not state that all containers in a lot must be loaded in the 88-hour time frame, but only stipulates that the loading of the lot must be reasonably continuous, with no consecutive break in loading to exceed 88-hours.
Five commenters suggested that GIPSA allow for a longer period of inactivity, ranging from 5 to 7 days. The commenters cited the inconsistent nature of the container shipping business, and the difficulty to obtain empty containers to load and the equipment to load them. GIPSA believes that applying a reasonably continuous loading requirement to containers will help to maintain overall quality and uniformity throughout the lot.
Commenters also mentioned that the marketplace demands currently in place mandate that containers be loaded as quickly as possible. The 88-hour requirement as proposed promotes the overall uniform quality in the official system by aligning single lot container shipments with existing regulations for ships, unit trains, and lash barges, where there are also market-driven forces to incentivize timely loading of grain shipments. GIPSA believes that imposing a reasonably continuous loading requirement will not place an undue burden on exporters as reflected in the current regulations for ships, unit trains, and lash barges, and will enhance the quality of grain shipped in large reusable containers. Therefore, GIPSA will make no change to the final rule based on the above comments.
GIPSA proposed restricting the inspection and weighing of large reusable container lots to the official service provider's area of responsibility. Two commenters stated that the requirement of having grain inspected, weighed, and certified in a particular geographic area by a single official service provider is too restrictive. Three commenters stated this would hurt smaller exporters as they would be prevented from drawing containers from different areas to make up a booking.
Section 800.81(d) restricts original and reinspection services performed by official personnel to specific areas of responsibility as defined by the Secretary. This final rule will permit the shipper to combine up to 20 large reusable containers in a single lot from different locations within the official service provider's area of responsibility. Furthermore, this is consistent with the current designation requirements applicable to official service providers that perform inspection and weighing services on unit trains and lash barges and therefore should not adversely affect small entities. Additional single lots comprised of a maximum of 20 large reusable containers of the same grade from other official service providers' territories will be permitted to be combined together on a single certificate using combined lot procedures outlined in § 800.85 of the regulations. GIPSA believes the use of combined lot procedures will help to ensure the overall quality and uniformity of the booking. Accordingly, GIPSA is making no change to the final rule based on the above comments.
One comment was received on GIPSA's proposed 60-day retention period for file samples representing large reusable container lots. The commenter proposed a 90-day file sample retention period due to potential extended transit times of export containers. GIPSA believes that establishing a minimum file sample retention period of 60 days is reasonable and consistent with current written instructions for export containers. Start Printed Page 43755Furthermore, § 800.152(c) provides for special retention periods. No other comments were received regarding the other amendments to the table at § 800.152(b). Accordingly, GIPSA is making no change to the final rule based on this comment.
Finally, GIPSA received no comments regarding its proposed addition of definitions for the terms “composite grade” and “average grade” in § 800.0 of the USGSA regulations. Additionally, GIPSA received no comments regarding the proposed change of the word “shall” to “must”, and “certificated” to “certified”, or other miscellaneous changes made throughout part 800. Therefore, GIPSA will amend 7 CFR part 800 as proposed.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), GIPSA has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Under the provisions of the USGSA, grain exported from the U.S., unless exempted, must be officially inspected and weighed. Mandatory inspection and weighing services are provided by GIPSA at 47 export facilities and by delegated States at 17 facilities, and seven facilities for U.S. grain transshipped through Canadian ports. All of these facilities are owned by multi-national corporations, large cooperatives, or public entities that do not meet the requirements for small entities established by the Small Business Administration (SBA). Furthermore, the USGSA (7 U.S.C. 87f-1) and regulations issued under the USGSA are applied equally to all entities. The USGSA requires the registration of all persons engaged in the business of buying grain for sale in foreign commerce. In addition, those persons who handle, weigh, or transport grain for sale in foreign commerce must also register. Section 800.30 of the USGSA regulations (7 CFR 800.30) defines a foreign commerce grain business as any person who regularly engages in buying for sale, handling, weighing, or transporting grain totaling 15,000 metric tons or more during the preceding or current calendar year. At present, there are 113 registered grain exporters. While most of the 113 registrants are large businesses, we believe that some may be small.
The SBA defines small businesses by their North American Industry Classification System Codes (NAICS). The SBA defines small grain exporters in its regulations (13 CFR 121.201) as entities having less than $7,000,000 in average annual receipts (NAICS code 115114). Small grain exporters that export less than 15,000 metric tons per year are exempt from the mandatory inspection and weighing requirements under § 800.18 of the USGSA regulations (7 CFR 800.18). This “waiver” was established to provide economic relief to small grain exporter businesses from inspection and weighing requirements without impairing the objectives of the USGSA.
This final rule will revise the regulations regarding procedures for official export grain inspection and weighing services performed under the authority of the USGSA. The final rule will also amend the USGSA regulations for grain shipped in large reusable containers for export; add new definitions for “composite” and “average” grades for grain in multiple large reusable containers certified on one certificate; limit the number of large reusable containers that would be averaged or combined in a single lot; restrict the inspection and weighing of large reusable container lots to the official service provider's area of responsibility to align large reusable containers with other shipments of grain; specify a 60-day retention period for file samples representing large reusable container lots; and align weighing certification procedures for large reusable container lots with those for inspection certification procedures.
There will be no additional reporting or record keeping requirements imposed upon either large or small entities as a result of this final rule. GIPSA has not identified any other Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. Given the forgoing discussion, GIPSA has therefore determined that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined in the RFA.
This final rule was reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive effect. The USGSA provides in section 87g (7 U.S.C. 87g) that no subdivision may require or impose any requirements or restrictions concerning the inspection, weighing, or description of grain under the USGSA. Otherwise, this rule will not preempt any State or local laws, or regulations, or policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
This final rule was reviewed with the requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments. This rule will not have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will not have significant Tribal implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the information collection and recordkeeping requirements in Part 800 were approved by Office of Management and Budget under Control No. 0580-0013 on October 23, 2011, and expire October 31, 2014.
GIPSA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 800End List of Subjects
For the reasons set out in the preamble, GIPSA will amend 7 CFR part 800 as follows:Start Part
PART 800—GENERAL REGULATIONSEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 800 would continue to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. Amend § 800.0(b) by removing the numerical paragraph designations (1) through (107) and adding in alphabetical order, definitions for “average grade” and “composite grade” to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
Average grade. Multiple carrier units or sublots that are graded individually then averaged to form a single lot inspection.
Composite grade. Multiple samples obtained from the same type of carriers (e.g., trucklots, containers) that are combined into one sample for grade to form a single lot inspection.
3. Amend § 800.84 by revising paragraphs (a), (b)(1) and (2), and paragraph (c) introductory text to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(a) General. The inspection of bulk or sacked grain loaded or unloaded from any carrier or container, except shiplot grain, must be conducted in accordance with the provision in this section and procedures prescribed in the instructions. Applicant must provide written instructions to official personnel, reflecting contract requirements for quality and quantity for the inspection of multiple carriers graded on a composite grade or average grade basis.
(b) * * *
(1) Single grade. When grain in a carrier(s) is/are offered for inspection as one lot and the grain is found to be uniform in condition, the grain must be sampled, inspected, graded, and certified as one lot. For the purpose of this paragraph, condition only includes the factors heating and odor.
(i) Composite grade. Grain loaded in multiple carriers offered for inspection may be combined into a single sample for grade analysis and certified as a single lot, provided that the grain in each individual carrier is inspected and found uniform in respect to odor, condition, and insect infestation, and sampling is performed at the individual loading location in a reasonably continuous operation. The maximum number of individual units that may be combined to form a composite grade analysis is 20 containers, 5 railcars, or 15 trucks. Composite analysis must be restricted to carriers inspected within the official service provider's area of responsibility.
(ii) Average grade. Grain loaded in multiple carriers offered for inspection may be graded individually, then averaged for certification as a single lot, provided that: the grain in each individual carrier is inspected and graded as an individual unit; the grain is found to be uniform in respect to odor, condition, and insect infestation; and sampling is performed at the individual loading location in a reasonably continuous operation. The maximum number of individual units that may be combined to form an average grade analysis is 20 containers, 5 railcars, or 15 trucks. Average grade analysis is restricted to carriers inspected within the official service provider's area of responsibility.
(2) Multiple grade. When grain in a carrier is offered for inspection as one lot and the grain is found to be not uniform in condition because portions of the grain are heating or have an odor, the grain in each portion will be sampled, inspected, and graded separately; but the results must be shown on one certificate. The certificate must show the approximate quantity or weight of each portion, the location of each portion in the carrier or container, and the grade of the grain in each portion. The requirements of this section are not applicable when an applicant requests that the grade of the entire carrier be based on a determination of heating or odor when only a portion of the carrier is found to be heating or have an odor.
(c) One certificate per carrier: exceptions. Except as provided in this paragraph, one official certificate must be issued for the inspection of the grain in each truck, trailer, truck/trailer(s) combination, container, railcar, barge, or similarly-sized carrier, or composite/average grade analysis on multiple carrier units. The requirements of this paragraph are not applicable:
4. Amend § 800.85 by revising paragraphs (b)(1), (c)(1) and (2), and (h)(4) and (5) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
(1) For inspection during loading, unloading, or at rest. Applications for official inspection of grain as a combined lot must:
(i) Be filed in accordance with § 800.116;
(ii) Show the estimated quantity of grain that is to be certified as one lot;
(iii) Show the contract grade, and if applicable; other inspection criteria required by the contract; and
(iv) Identify each carrier into which grain is being loaded or from which grain is being unloaded.
(c) * * *
(1) Inspection during loading, or unloading, or at rest. Grain in two or more land carriers or barges that are to be officially inspected as a combined lot, must be sampled in a reasonably continuous operation. Representative samples must be obtained from the grain in each individual carrier and inspected in accordance with procedures as prescribed in the instructions.
(2) Recertification. Grain that has been officially inspected and certified as two or more single, composite, or average quality lots may be recertified as a combined lot provided that:
(i) The grain in each lot was sampled in a reasonably continuous operation;
(ii) The original inspection certificates issued for the single, composite, or average quality lots have been surrendered to official personnel;
(iii) Representative file samples of the single, composite, or average quality lots are available;
(iv) The grain in the single, composite, or average quality lots is of the same grade or better grade and quality than as specified in the written instructions provided by the shipper;
(v) Official personnel who performed the inspection service for the single, composite, or average quality lots and the official personnel who are to recertify the grain as a combined lot must determine that the samples used as a basis for the inspection of the grain in the single, composite, or average quality lots were representative at the time of sampling and have not changed in quality or condition; and
(vi) The quality or condition of the grain meets uniformity requirements established by the Service for official inspection of grain in combined lots.
(h) * * *
(4) Combined-lot certification; general. Each official certificate for a combined-lot inspection service must show the identification for the “combined lot” or, at the request of the applicant, the identification of each carrier in the combined lot. If the identification of each carrier is not shown, the statement “Carrier identification available on the official work record” must be shown on the inspection certificate in the space provided for remarks. The identification and any seal information for the carriers may be shown in the Remarks section on the reverse side of the inspection certificate, provided that the statement “See reverse side” is shown on the face of the certificate in the space provided for remarks, or on an additional page.
(5) Recertification. If a request for a combined-lot inspection service is filed after the grain has been officially inspected and certified as single, composite, or average quality lots, the combined-lot inspection certificate must show, in addition to the requirements of paragraph (h)(4) of this section the following:
(i) The date of inspection of the grain in the combined lot (if the single, Start Printed Page 43757composite, or average quality lots were inspected on different dates, the latest of the dates must be shown);
(ii) A serial number other than the serial numbers of the official inspection certificates that are to be superseded;
(iii) The location of the grain, if at rest, or the name(s) of the elevator(s) from which or into which the grain in the combined lot was loaded or unloaded;
(iv) A statement showing the approximate quantity of grain in the combined lot;
(v) A completed statement showing the identification of any superseded certificates; and
(vi) If at the time of issuing the combined-lot inspection certificate the superseded certificates are not in the custody of the official personnel, a statement indicating that the superseded certificates have not been surrendered must be clearly shown in the space provided for remarks. If the superseded certificates are in the custody of official personnel, the superseded certificates must be clearly marked “Void.”
5. Amend § 800.97 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (c)(1) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
(1) General. If grain in a carrier is offered for inspection or weighing service as one lot, the grain must be weighed at the individual weighing location in a reasonably continuous operation and certified as one lot. The identification of the carrier(s) must be recorded on the scale tape or ticket and the weight certificate.
(c) * * *
(1) Basic requirement. One official certificate must be issued for the weighing of the grain in each container, truck, trailer, truck/trailer(s) combination, railroad car, barge, or similarly sized carrier. This requirement is not applicable to multiple grain carriers weighed as a single lot or combined lot under § 800.98.
6. Amend § 800.98 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) and (c)(2) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
(1) Single lot weighing. (i) Single lots of grain that are to be weighed as a combined lot may be weighed at multiple locations, provided that:
(A) The lots are contained in the same type of carrier; and
(B) Weighing is performed at each individual location in a reasonably continuous operation.
(ii) The grain loaded into or unloaded from each carrier must be weighed in accordance with procedures prescribed in the instructions. In the case of sacked grain, a representative weight sample must be obtained from the grain in each carrier unless otherwise specified in the instructions.
(2) Recertification. Grain that has been weighed and certified as two or more single lots may be recertified as a combined lot, provided that the original weight certificates issued for the single lots have been or will be surrendered to the appropriate agency or field office, and the official personnel who performed the weighing service for the single lots and the official personnel who are to recertify the grain as a combined lot determine that the weight of the grain in the lots has not since changed, and in the case of sacked grain, that the weight samples used as a basis for weighing the single lots were representative at the time of the weighing.
(c) * * *
(2) Recertification. If a request for a combined-lot Class X or Class Y weighing service is filed after the grain in the single lots has been weighed and certified, the combined-lot weighing certificate must show the following:
(i) The date of weighing the grain in the combined lot (if the single lots were weighed on different dates, the latest dates must be shown);
(ii) A serial number, other than the serial numbers of the weight certificates that are to be superseded;
(iii) The name of the elevator(s) from which or into which the grain in the combined lot was loaded or unloaded;
(iv) A statement showing the weight of the grain in the combined lot;
(v) A completed statement showing the identification of any superseded certificate as follows: “This combined-lot certificate supersedes certificate Nos. ___, dated ___; and
(vi) If at any time of issuing the combined-lot weight certificate, the superseded certificates are not in the custody of the agency or field office, the statement “The superseded certificates identified herein have not been surrendered” must be shown clearly in the space provided for remarks beneath the statement identifying the superseded certificates. If the superseded certificates are in the custody of the agency or field office, the superseded certificates must be clearly marked “Void.”
7. Amend § 800.152 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) Minimum retention period. Upon request by an agency and with the approval of the Service, specified file samples or classes of file samples may be retained for shorter periods of time.
|(3) Ships & Barges||5||25||90|
|(4) Ships and Barges (short voyage—5 days or less)||5||25||60|
|(6) Bins & Tanks||3|
|(7) Submitted Samples||3|
Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-17452 Filed 7-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P