This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 01/03/2014 at 08:45 am.
Postal Regulatory Commission.
The Postal Service has filed an Annual Compliance Report on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with its products in fiscal year 2013. Within 90 days, the Commission must evaluate that information and issue its determination as to whether rates were in compliance with title 39, chapter 36 and whether service standards in effect were met. To assist in this, the Commission seeks public comments on the Postal Service's Annual Compliance Report.
Comments are due: January 31, 2014.
Reply Comments are due: February 14, 2014.
Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing Online system at http://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Table of Contents
II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2013 ACR
III. Procedural Steps
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
On December 27, 2013, the United States Postal Service (Postal Service) filed with the Commission, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3652, its Annual Compliance Report (ACR) for fiscal year (FY) 2013. Section 3652 requires submission of data and information on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with postal products within 90 days of the closing of each fiscal year. In conformance with other statutory provisions and Commission rules, the ACR includes the Postal Service's FY 2013 Comprehensive Statement, its FY 2013 annual report to the Secretary of the Treasury on the Competitive Products Fund, and certain related Competitive Products Fund material. See respectively, 39 U.S.C. 3652(g), 39 U.S.C. 2011(i), and 39 CFR 3060.20-23. In line with past practice, some of the material in the FY 2013 ACR appears in non-public annexes.
The filing begins a review process that results in an Annual Compliance Determination (ACD) issued by the Commission to determine whether Postal Service products offered during FY 2013 are in compliance with applicable title 39 requirements.
II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2013 ACR
Contents of the filing. The Postal Service's FY 2013 ACR consists of a 56-page narrative; extensive additional material appended as separate folders and identified in Attachment One; and an application for non-public treatment of certain materials, along with supporting rationale, filed as Attachment Two. The filing also Start Printed Page 670includes the Comprehensive Statement, Report to the Secretary of the Treasury, and information on the Competitive Products Fund filed in response to Commission rules. This material has been filed electronically with the Commission, and some also has been filed in hard-copy form.
Scope of filing. The material appended to the narrative consists of: (1) domestic product costing material filed on an annual basis summarized in the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA); (2) comparable international costing material summarized in the International Cost and Revenue Analysis (ICRA); (3) worksharing-related cost studies; and (4) billing determinant information for both domestic and international mail. FY 2013 ACR at 2-3. Inclusion of these four data sets is consistent with the Postal Service's past ACR practices. As with past ACRs, the Postal Service has split certain materials into public and non-public versions. Id. at 3.
“Roadmap” document. A roadmap to the FY 2013 ACR appears as Library Reference USPS-FY13-9. This document provides brief descriptions of the materials submitted, as well as the flow of inputs and outputs among them; a discussion of differences in methodology relative to Commission methodologies in last year's ACD; a list of special studies and a discussion of obsolescence, as required by Commission rule 3050.12. Id. at 3-4.
Methodology. The Postal Service states that it has adhered to the methodologies applied by the Commission in the FY 2012 ACD, except in instances where the Commission approved methodology changes subsequent to the FY 2012 ACD. Those changes are identified in a separate section of the roadmap document as well as the prefaces accompanying the appended folders. Id. at 4. One exception to this is the incorporation of the methodology in Proposals One through Three. The Postal Service states that although the Commission's review of Proposals One through Three is still pending, it was not practical for it to prepare the FY 2013 ACR without employing these principles. Id. at 6.
Proposals for which the Postal Service has filed to change analytical principles since the filing of the FY 2012 ACR are identified and summarized in a table. Id. at 4-5.
Market dominant product-by-product costs, revenues, and volumes. Comprehensive cost, revenue, and volume data for all market dominant products of general applicability are shown directly in the FY 2013 CRA or ICRA. Id. at 9.
The FY 2013 ACR includes a discussion by class of each market dominant product, including costs, revenues, and volumes, workshare discounts and passthroughs responsive to 39 U.S.C. 3652(b), and FY 2013 incentive programs. Id. at 9-39. In addition, in response to Order No. 1427, the Postal Service also provides a schedule of future price increases for Standard Mail Flats. Id. at 19-20.
Market dominant negotiated service agreements. The FY 2013 ACR presents information on market dominant negotiated service agreements (NSAs). Id. at 38. Although there were two market dominant NSAs in effect for FY 2013, Discover Financial Services and Valassis, 2013 mailings were only made under the Discover Financial Services NSA. Valassis did not send enough NSA-eligible volume to qualify for volume discounts, and therefore paid published rates during FY 2013. Id.
Service performance. The Postal Service notes that the Commission issued rules on periodic reporting of service performance measurement and customer satisfaction in FY 2010. Responsive information appears in Library Reference USPS-FY13-29. Id. at 40. The Postal Service says it set aggressive on-time targets of 90 percent or above for all market dominant products and, overall, has been successful in continuously improving these scores. It asserts that its targets have already been met or exceeded for some products and in some districts, but says there are several instances where target scores have not yet been met at the national level. Specific reasons for these results are discussed in Library Reference USPS-FY13-29. Id. at 40.
Customer satisfaction. The FY 2013 ACR discusses the Postal Service's approach for measuring customer experience and satisfaction; describes the methodology; presents a table with survey results; and compares the results from FY 2012 to FY 2013. Id. at 41-44.
Competitive products. The FY 2013 ACR provides costs, revenues, and volumes for competitive products of general applicability in the FY 2013 CRA or ICRA. For competitive products not of general applicability, data are provided in non-public Library References USPS-FY13-NP2 and USPS-FY13-NP27. The FY 2013 ACR also addresses the competitive product pricing standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 45-51.
Market tests; nonpostal services. The Postal Service also addresses the two market dominant market tests conducted during FY 2013, the two competitive market tests conducted during FY 2013, and nonpostal services. Id. at 52-54. With respect to the latter, it notes that on December 11, 2012, the Commission issued Order No. 1575 approving Mail Classification Schedule (MCS) descriptions and prices for nonpostal service products. The approved MCS includes 11 nonpostal service products, two of which are market dominant and nine of which are competitive. Request at 53. It has provided revenue, cost, and volume data for the two market dominant nonpostal service products. Id. The Postal Service states that for the other market dominant nonpostal service, Philatelic Sales, it filed Proposal Six (Docket No. RM2014-1) on November 8, 2013, seeking to update the methodology for calculating the costs of Philatelic Sales and handling costs of Stamp Fulfillment Services. Because Proposal Six is still pending before the Commission, the Postal Service provides revenue, costs, and volumes under both the current methodology and the methodology proposed in Proposal Six. Request at 54.
III. Procedural Steps
Statutory requirements. Section 3653 of title 39 requires the Commission to provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment on the ACR and to appoint an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public. The Commission hereby solicits public comment on the Postal Service's FY 2013 ACR and on whether any rates or fees in effect during FY 2013 (for products individually or collectively) were not in compliance with applicable provisions of chapter 36 of title 39 (or regulations promulgated thereunder). Commenters addressing market dominant products are referred in particular to the applicable requirements (39 U.S.C. 3622(d) and (e) Start Printed Page 671and 3626); objectives (39 U.S.C. 3622(b)); and factors (39 U.S.C. 3622(c)). Commenters addressing competitive products are referred to 39 U.S.C. 3633.
The Commission also invites public comment on the cost coverage matters the Postal Service addresses in its filing; service performance results; levels of customer satisfaction achieved; and such other matters that may be relevant to the Commission's review. Comments on these topics will, inter alia, assist the Commission in developing appropriate recommendations to the Postal Service related to the protection or promotion of the public policy objectives of title 39.
Access to filing. The Commission has posted the publicly available portions of the FY 2013 ACR on its Web site at http://www.prc.gov.
Comment deadlines. Comments by interested persons are due on or before January 31, 2014. Reply comments are due on or before February 14, 2014. The Commission, upon completion of its review of the FY 2013 ACR, public comments, and other data and information submitted in this proceeding, will issue its ACD. Those needing assistance filing electronically may contact the Docket Section supervisor at 202-789-6846 or via email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Inquiries about access to non-public materials should also be directed to the Docket Section.
Public Representative. Kenneth E. Richardson is designated to serve as the Public Representative to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding. Neither the Public Representative nor any additional persons assigned to assist him shall participate in or advise as to any Commission decision in this proceeding other than in their designated capacity.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. ACR2013 to consider matters raised by the United States Postal Service's FY 2013 Annual Compliance Report.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Kenneth E. Richardson as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) in this proceeding to represent the interests of the general public.
3. Comments on the United States Postal Service's FY 2013 Annual Compliance Report to the Commission, including the Comprehensive Statement of Postal Operations and other reports, are due on or before January 31, 2014.
4. Reply comments are due on or before February 14, 2014.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register.Start Signature
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
1. United States Postal Service FY 2013 Annual Compliance Report, December 27, 2013 (FY 2013 ACR). Public portions of the Postal Service's filing are available on the Commission's Web site at http://www.prc.gov.Back to Citation
2. In the past, the Commission has reviewed the Postal Service's reports prepared pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 2803 and 39 U.S.C. 2804 (filed as the Comprehensive Statement by the Postal Service) in its Annual Compliance Determination. To allow for more thorough review of the issues involved, the Commission intends to review these issues in a separate docket going forward.Back to Citation
3. These proposals, along with Proposals Four and Five, are pending in Docket No. RM2013-6.Back to Citation
4. Docket No. ACR2010, Order No. 1427, Order on Remand, August 9, 2012.Back to Citation
5. Id. at 53; see also Docket No. MC2010-24, Order Approving Mail Classification Descriptions and Prices for Nonpostal Service Products, December 11, 2012 (Order No. 1575).Back to Citation
6. Docket No. RM2014-1, Petition of the United States Postal for the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Change in Analytical Principles (Proposals Six Through Eight), November 8, 2013.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 2013-31512 Filed 1-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P