Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
On November 8, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published its preliminary results for the new shipper review (NSR) of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (the PRC) covering the period of review (POR) of November 1, 2011, through October 31, 2012, for Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. (Goodman).
Based on our analysis of comments received subsequent to the Preliminary Results, the Department now finds that Goodman's sales were not bona fide. As a result, the Department is rescinding this NSR.
Effective Date: April 21, 2014.
Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Czajkowski or Gene Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1395 or (202) 482-3586, respectively.
End Further Info
Start Supplemental Information
On November 8, 2013, the Department published the Preliminary Results. Between January 13, 2014, and January 22, 2014, Petitioners
and Goodman each submitted case and rebuttal briefs. On January 29, 2014, the Department conducted a hearing regarding this NSR.
As explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from October 1, through October 16, 2013.
Therefore, all deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 16 days. As a result, the revised deadline for the final results of this NSR is now April 3, 2014.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are all grades of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves. The product is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, and 2005.99.9700. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description is dispositive.
Final Rescission of New Shipper Review
Due to the totality of circumstances, including price, quantity, and concerns regarding the relationship with another garlic exporter located in the PRC, as detailed in the Goodman Final Analysis Memorandum, the Department finds that Goodman's sales are not bona fide.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently and is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised in the briefs and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's centralized electronic service system (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Start Printed Page 22099Department's Central Records Unit, Room 7064 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Effective upon publication of the final rescission of the NSR of Goodman, the Department will instruct CBP to discontinue the option of posting a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject merchandise by Goodman. Cash deposits will be required for exports of subject merchandise by Goodman entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date at the per-unit PRC-wide rate, $4.71 per kilogram.
Both the PRC separate rate and the PRC entity are under review in the 2011-2012 administrative review, which is currently being conducted,
and the POR of the administrative review coincides with the POR of this NSR. Goodman has filed a separate rate application in the concurrent administrative review indicating that it is independent of Chinese government control. Therefore, we will issue liquidation instructions for Goodman's entries upon completion of the administrative review. In the final results of the administrative review, the Department will determine whether Goodman qualifies for the PRC separate rate or the PRC-wide rate. Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on entries for Goodman at the appropriate rate.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary of Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
Return of Destruction of Proprietary Information
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214.
Dated: April 3, 2014.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Goodman Qualifies for a New Shipper Rate
Comment 2: Whether Goodman's Sales are Bona Fide
Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Change the Surrogate Country from the Philippines to Thailand
Comment 4: Whether the Department Should Use the Month Corresponding to Goodman's Sales to Calculate Surrogate Values for Garlic
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Rely on the Import Data Used in the Preliminary Results
Comment 6: Whether the Department Should Use Farm Gate Prices or Wholesale Prices
Comment 7: Whether the Department Should Continue to Rely on the Financial Statements Used in the Preliminary Results.
Comment 8: Whether the Department Should Use MERALCO's Tariff to Value Electricity
Comment 9: Whether the Department Should Include the Transportation Expense in the Overhead Ratio
Comment 10: Whether Goodman is Entitled to a Separate Rate in this Proceeding
Comment 11: Whether the PRC-Wide Entity Rate is Reliable and Relevant
End Supplemental Information
[FR Doc. 2014-09015 Filed 4-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P