Skip to Content

During the funding lapse, is not being supported. If data feeds are not available from GPO, will not be updated, so please use the official edition of the Federal Register on Govinfo ( If there is a technical issue with the Public Inspection List, you can view the documents on public inspection at our office in Washington, DC or on


Sugar From Mexico: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in Countervailing Duty Investigation

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document including its time on Public Inspection. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble


Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.


Effective Date: June 3, 2014.

Start Further Info


Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-3857; telephone: 202-482-3857.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information



On April 17, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated the countervailing duty (CVD) investigation of sugar from Mexico.[1] Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than June 23, 2014.

Postponement of Preliminary Determination

Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in a CVD investigation no later than 65 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation. However, if the Department determines that the parties concerned in the investigation are cooperating and that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, section 703(c)(1)(B) of the Act allows the Department to postpone making the preliminary determination until no later than 130 days after the date on which it initiated the investigation.

The Department determines that the parties involved in this proceeding are cooperating.[2] Since the petition for this CVD investigation was filed,[3] four separate Mexican sugar exporters/producers filed entries of appearances,[4] as well as one Mexican sugar industry trade group, which alone represents at least nineteen individual Mexican sugar companies, including the Mexican government's expropriated mill-operating organization, Fondo de Empresas Expropiadas del Sector Azucarero.[5] Each of these interested parties contributed to the record of this investigation.[6] Furthermore, the Government of Mexico (GOM) has been actively involved in this proceeding. The GOM is on the public service list for this investigation, sent a delegation to the Department's main building for consultations regarding initiation,[7] and has since filed comments on the investigation's scope.[8] Such actions by the Mexican sugar industry and the GOM indicate that the interested parties are currently cooperating in this investigation.

The Department also determines that this investigation is extraordinarily complicated in light of (1) the number and complexity of the alleged countervailable subsidy programs and (2) the need to determine the extent to which particular countervailable subsidies are used by individual manufacturers, producers, and Start Printed Page 31921exporters.[9] Specifically, the Department must analyze at least 20 complex alleged subsidy programs, most of which have never before been examined by the Department.[10] These programs include debt discount and forgiveness, grants, various tax benefits, and preferential loans, which must be examined for each respondent selected and any company that is cross-owned with such respondents. If certain companies are selected as respondents, the Department will also analyze several company-specific uncreditworthiness allegations.[11] As such, the Department will likely have to issue multiple supplemental questionnaires. Moreover, the Department determines that additional time is necessary to make the preliminary determination in this investigation because initial questionnaires for this investigation have not yet been issued to the GOM or respondents and the Department will require additional time to review and analyze questionnaire responses once received from the GOM, respondents, and any companies cross-owned with respondents.

For these reasons, pursuant to section 703(c)(1) of the Act, the Department is hereby postponing the due date for the preliminary CVD determination to no later than 130 days after the day on which the investigation was initiated. As a result of this postponement, the deadline for completion of the preliminary determination is now August 25, 2014.

This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).

Start Signature

Dated: May 28, 2014.

Paul Piquado,

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

End Signature End Supplemental Information


1.  See Sugar from Mexico: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 79 FR 22790 (April 24, 2014).

Back to Citation

2.  See section 703(c)(1)(B) of the Act.

Back to Citation

3.  See Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of Sugar from Mexico, March 28, 2014.

Back to Citation

4.  See, e.g., “Entry of Appearance and APO Application,” filed on behalf of Impulsora Azucarera del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V., April 24, 2014.

Back to Citation

5.  See “Entry of Appearance and Administrative Protective Order Application” and “Amended Entry of Appearance and Administrative Protective Order Application,” filed on behalf of Camara Nacional de Las Industrias Azucarera Y Al Alcoholera, April 11, 2014.

Back to Citation

6.  See, e.g., “Scope Comments,” filed on behalf of Batory Foods Inc., May 7, 2014.

Back to Citation

7.  See “Consultations with the Government of Mexico Regarding the Countervailing Duty Petition on Sugar from Mexico,” April 11, 2014.

Back to Citation

8.  See “Brief Submission of the Government of Mexico,” May 7, 2014.

Back to Citation

9.  See section 703(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act.

Back to Citation

10.  See generally “Countervailing Duty Initiation Checklist,” April 17, 2014.

Back to Citation

11.  Id. at 24-25.

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2014-12849 Filed 6-2-14; 8:45 am]