This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Proposed Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat Division at one of the addresses shown below on or before February 13, 2015 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
571
as of
09/11/2026 at 8:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2014-29151 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
12/12/2014 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2014-29151 (79 FR 74558)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to require additional actions by contractors to assist contracting officers in ensuring compliance with the Governmentwide statutory prohibition on the use of appropriated (or otherwise made available) funds for contracts with any foreign incorporated entity that is an inverted domestic corporation or to any subsidiary of such entity.
DATES:
Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat Division at one of the addresses shown below on or before February 13, 2015 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES:
Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2015-006 by any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov:http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for “FAR Case 2015-006”. Select the link “Comment Now” that corresponds with “FAR Case 2015-006”. Follow the instructions provided at the “Comment Now” screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and “FAR Case 2015-006” on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Hada Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions:
Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2015-006, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, at 202-208-4949, for clarification of content. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2015-006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to revise the provisions of the FAR that address the continuing Governmentwide statutory prohibition (in effect since fiscal year 2008) on the use of appropriated (or otherwise made available) funds for contracts with any foreign incorporated entity that is an inverted domestic corporation (under section 835 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified at 6 U.S.C. 395) or any subsidiary of such entity. By separate notice, DOD, GSA, and NASA have issued an interim rule (FAR Case 2014-017) that more clearly reflects the ongoing and continuing nature of this statutory prohibition.
An inverted domestic corporation is a corporation that meets the criteria specified in 6 U.S.C. 395(b) and (c). To date, an offeror has been required to include a statement in its offer (found at FAR 52.209-2(c) and 52.212-3(n)(2)) representing that by signing the offer, the offeror is representing that it is not an inverted domestic corporation or a subsidiary of an inverted domestic corporation. To increase the Government's ability to identify an offeror's status as an inverted domestic corporation, this rule proposes to change the representation to require an affirmative act by the offeror to complete two yes/no check-off boxes on whether it is an inverted domestic corporation, or a subsidiary of one, so that the Government will know which corporations are subject to the contracting prohibition. (Contracting officers would be allowed to continue relying on the offeror's representation unless there is an independent reason to question it.)
In accordance with FAR 4.1201(b)(1), 52.204-8, and 52.212-3, offerors would continue to be required to represent their current status at the earlier of an offer submission or the annual anniversary of their registration in the System for Award Management (SAM). This existing requirement, coupled with the proposed new more specific representation, will better ensure clear, current, accurate, and complete disclosure by offerors of whether or not they are an inverted domestic corporation, for consideration by a contracting officer before making a new contract award.
In addition, the rule proposes to add a new paragraph to FAR clause 52.209-10 that would require the contractor, when the contractor becomes an inverted domestic corporation during contract performance, to give written notification of its change in status as an inverted domestic corporation to the contracting officer within five business days from the date of the inversion event.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq.,
because this rule will only impact an offeror that is an inverted domestic corporation and wants to do business with the Government. It is expected that the number of small entities impacted by this rule will be minimal. Small business concerns are unlikely to have been incorporated in the United States (or, if a partnership, established in the United States) and then subsequently incorporated in a foreign country; the major participants in these transactions are reportedly large multinational corporations. No domestic entities will be impacted by this rule. For the definition of “small business,” the Regulatory Flexibility Act refers to the Small Business Act, which in turn allows the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Administrator to specify detailed definitions or standards (5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C. 632(a)). The SBA regulations at 13 CFR 121.105 discuss who is a small business: “(a)(1) Except for small agricultural
( printed page 74559)
cooperatives, a business concern eligible for assistance from SBA as a small business is a business entity organized for profit, with a place of business located in the United States, and which operates primarily within the United States or which makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor.” Therefore, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been performed. DoD, GSA, and NASA invite comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by the rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C 610 (FAR Case 2015-006), in correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) applies because the proposed rule contains information collection requirements. Accordingly, the Regulatory Secretariat Division will submit a request for approval of a new information collection requirement concerning Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations to the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Public Reporting Burden
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average .2 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden estimated as follows:
Respondents:
352,000.
Responses per respondent:
Approximately 1.
Total annual responses:
352,002.
Preparation hours per response:
Approximately .2.
Total response Burden Hours:
70,410.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden.
Submit comments, including suggestions for reducing this burden, not later than February 13, 2015 to: FAR Desk Officer, OMB, Room 10102, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and a copy to the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Hada Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20405.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the FAR, and will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Requesters may obtain a copy of the supporting statement from the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Hada Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20405.
Please cite OMB Control Number 9000-00XX, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations, in all correspondence.
Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations.
* * * * *
Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations (DATE)
* * * * *
(d) In the event the Contractor becomes either an inverted domestic corporation, or a subsidiary of an inverted domestic corporation during contract performance, the Contractor shall give written notice to the Contracting Officer within five business days from the date of the inversion event.
* * * * *
4. Amend section 52.212-3 by revising the date of the provision; and paragraph (n)(2) to read as follows:
Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Items (DATE)
(a) * * *
(1) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (DATE)(section 745 of Division D of Pub. L. 110-161 and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts and continuing resolutions).